Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(56,582 posts)

8. Clearly not, since Connecticut does already, and the rifle was legal

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:22 PM

Jan 2013

Banning semi-automatics might.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How many kids could he have mowed down if he had a revolver? gateley Jan 2013 #1

You mean, a standard revolver. pnwmom Jan 2013 #9

Just something that wasn't designed for war. gateley Jan 2013 #14

Ignore Rubio Dpm12 Jan 2013 #2

Let me see - malaise Jan 2013 #4

Clearly not, since Connecticut does already, and the rifle was legal Recursion Jan 2013 #8

+1 gateley Jan 2013 #15

It would have still left handguns hack89 Jan 2013 #13

I don't know of anyone Smilo Jan 2013 #6

Exactly. Lint Head Jan 2013 #7

All I have to say... Dpm12 Jan 2013 #11

Exactly. At least he wants his potential voters to think that. gateley Jan 2013 #16