General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Game to destroy CCTV cameras: vandalism or valid protest? [View all]graham4anything
(11,464 posts)So should the man in T Square in China have been filmed?
Who decides who's film is good or bad?
Some anarchist/terrorist in a mask depicting a fictional rightwing terrorist?
Judge, jury executioner like Tim McCoward over some delusional conspiarcy theory he had?
Who decides?
I wish a camera could have shown Mr. Martin and his skittles and the fact that at NO time,
zimmy's life was in danger.
needless to say though, through it all,
a crime is a crime.
And how much TAXPAYER MONEY are these hoodlums, these gangsters doing?
And the 99%ers are the one who pay the costs, right? That is what you guys tell me on other threads.
So these hoodlums are stealing the 99% money like some claim the CEOs are doing.
right?
btw, is the film of the JFK thing good or bad? Just asking?
how about the camera of the moon landing? Was that a bad thing?
The way to make the governemnt safe for all, is with MORE cameras and tapes.
Exposes the bad.
same with crime and terrorism.
the one fallacy all those that don't like this or that, is that TERRORISM KILLS REAL PEOPLE.
There is no fake people and lies. REAL PEOPLE DIE
I myself like that there is security on planes and trains
Wish I could say the same about my right to peaceful assembly anywhere I damn choose, like a movie theatre, without someone in an anarchistic mask coming in and shooting up the place.
Hey, why not do what Bob Dylan or mimes do, if they worry you.
Hold out a card with words and an arrow
PHONE> and have that held high, when reaching into your pocket for your cellphone
then hold your cellphone up, and wave and say smile you are on camera
(not being snarky here either.)
this my camera is good, but that one is bad is hypocritical
let's just all assume we are on camera 24/7/365
if one is then not doing anything wrong, one has nothing to fear but fear itself (As FDR said)