Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
31. Yes you are, and don't fall for the incessant commercials.
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 10:30 AM
Mar 2013

Their purpose is to get you to doubt that you are in the majority. Don't buy it for a moment.

Part of what the one percent have created as they have purchased into our government is a devastating propaganda machine to create exactly the type of helplessness you express here. They have purchased both parties, and they have purchased our media, and don't think for a moment that "media" is limited to the cable television channels and newspapers. Corporate-political propaganda is as ubiquitous now on the internet as surveillance is now in our daily lives, and discussion boards like this are a major focus of the corporate political elite. Money talks, and these people have very deep pockets. You will have a very difficult time these days finding any major discussion board on the internet that is not heavily patrolled and propagandized by those who have an interest in shaping public opinion and responses. DU is no exception.

If you watch the board closely over time, you will see the patterns and the tactics coming from the very same group, over and over and over again. Their goal, quite simply, is to create the illusion that their views are mainstream and to intimidate people from expressing opinions critical of the corporate status quo in our party. But watch the actual recs, and you will see that you are very much in the majority when it comes to opinions about policy. The purveyors of Third Way corporatism will use every tactic to talk about anything but the policies; they will personalize the discussion, they will try to make it all about Obama and loyalty to the party, and they will try to swarm and intimidate and mock you. Their goal is to create the impression that everyone thinks as they do, and that you are in the minority.

But you aren't. Recs here on the actual policies coming out of this administration show clearly and devastatingly that you aren't. Polls of Americans across the country show clearly and devastatingly that you aren't.

You are part of a vast majority of Americans who recognize that something is seriously, seriously wrong with our "representative" system and the institutions, like our media, that have historically played the role of watchdog for corruption. We do not have a government that is using its resources to serve the people. We have a government serving the interests of a monied elite. They have an agenda for profit, and their goal is no longer to represent us, but to use every resource they have, and can buy, to keep us as passive and submissive as possible while they implement that agenda.

The propaganda has reached the point of being blatantly Orwellian. That is why you feel crazy and out of step. We are continually told that things are getting better, while we observe every single day a new, serious betrayal by those who claim to represent us. You are not crazy. Things are not getting better. They are getting worse. The chocolate ration has not been increased.

Trust yourself. Keep speaking out. Watch the board closely and see how the game works. Don't let the propaganda win.

I agree with you! GitRDun Mar 2013 #1
You do not become President of this country anymore w/o owing the corporate masters. Dustlawyer Mar 2013 #27
+1 Newest Reality Mar 2013 #34
This administration has appointed industry shills in almost everycase. xtraxritical Mar 2013 #121
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Mar 2013 #239
Thanks for not flaming me, I'm glad I'm not completely alone here. xtraxritical Apr 2013 #300
I stand in solidarity with you too. truedelphi Apr 2013 #304
On the contrary. woo me with science Apr 2013 #305
Thank you. xtraxritical Apr 2013 #309
I've been told many times here on DU that...... Hotler Mar 2013 #133
It makes sense when you recognize the real goal here. woo me with science Mar 2013 #214
WORTHY OF ITS OWN THREAD Skittles Mar 2013 #226
It won't matter DollarBillHines Mar 2013 #237
I fear you are correct Skittles Mar 2013 #238
Part of the problem Mnpaul Mar 2013 #254
YES!!!!! Hotler Mar 2013 #229
We have a winner! blackspade Mar 2013 #258
Sad but true October Apr 2013 #282
+1 Marr Apr 2013 #323
It's not Obama's fault. It's a Republican plot woo me with science Mar 2013 #2
LOL, you nailed that one. I am waiting for the usual suspects to defend this. n-t Logical Mar 2013 #5
the subject of the Monsanto connected appointments generally is G_j Mar 2013 #11
Just read that post whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #32
Perfect. drokhole Mar 2013 #69
Yep. Same with "entitlement" "reforms". jsr Mar 2013 #78
I now consider myself a member of the Progressive Caucus and not a Democrat. xtraxritical Mar 2013 #122
... SidDithers Mar 2013 #129
You are correct the picture does have a mustache. xtraxritical Mar 2013 #135
I agree but I thought that he would get a place on the board of Monsanto and Chase emsimon33 Mar 2013 #177
You're probably righter than me. xtraxritical Mar 2013 #232
yup Skittles Mar 2013 #180
Believe it or not, that actually makes sense.....n/t AverageJoe90 Mar 2013 #189
LOL-- that's about it. Ever see those old models of the solar system, with the Earth in the middle? Marr Mar 2013 #247
That's exactly what I have been told over the past few days. The only way sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #262
Because edhopper Mar 2013 #3
K&R As if he wouldn't have signed a standalone Monsanto protection order... MotherPetrie Mar 2013 #4
Prosense will explain it to us shortly. n-t Logical Mar 2013 #6
I'll be along shortly ProSense Mar 2013 #16
Wow... SidDithers Mar 2013 #39
LOL, stalker. I value your opinion! n-t Logical Mar 2013 #47
If you sit at the "cool kids" table, you can get away with calling someone rhett o rick Mar 2013 #64
So you're cool with sending harassing PM's? ProSense Mar 2013 #80
"there is no need to be disingenuous", and there is no need to be rude. rhett o rick Mar 2013 #95
Hey ProSense Mar 2013 #98
Your cat fight is completely off topic and has no place here, go away with this stuff. xtraxritical Mar 2013 #123
No. You go away. n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #134
My god. The wit. The insight. Jakes Progress Mar 2013 #139
Wow, you're so on top of things! ProSense Mar 2013 #141
You think I should get down there where you are? Jakes Progress Mar 2013 #144
Typical. n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #148
Typical. t Jakes Progress Mar 2013 #157
Tell that to Logical.. he/she started this Cha Mar 2013 #149
LOL, it appears it needed started! n-t Logical Mar 2013 #172
Yeah, it seems DU doesn't really like stalkers afterall. Cha Mar 2013 #179
LOL, stalking. 2 messages. And not rude ones. Paranoid much? n-t Logical Mar 2013 #193
I disagree. Seems stalkers don't even know they're stalking. n/t Cha Mar 2013 #198
Wow, you disagree. What a shock. I will take it under consideration. n-t Logical Mar 2013 #199
You do that but you better stop the stalking. n/t Cha Mar 2013 #201
I will reply to any post I want. And send PMs when I want. Both fine. And you/her .... Logical Mar 2013 #202
Got it.. you have no intention of stopping your stalking behavior. n/t Cha Mar 2013 #205
I have no intention of stopping following the DU rules. Why is this hard for you? n-t Logical Mar 2013 #209
You started this by calling out a poster. Just apologize and end it. You can even delete your msg JaneyVee Mar 2013 #233
It's really not hard, all the huffy responses notwithstanding. woo me with science Apr 2013 #261
Bingo! n/t Wind Dancer Apr 2013 #314
I believe you can alert on PM's michigandem58 Mar 2013 #117
That e-mail had a question in it that you never answer, but everyone asks. bahrbearian Mar 2013 #150
It's an ProSense Mar 2013 #154
See, I am not the only one questioning your motives. Wonder what you are hiding. n-t Logical Mar 2013 #171
Wow, you thought your harassing PM was cleverly disguised? n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #175
LOL, harassing? One was asking you your motive. One was asking you to respond to.... Logical Mar 2013 #170
LOL! You can stalk someone and then have other DU'ers support your fucked up behavior=bullying KittyWampus Mar 2013 #103
I am against the double standard where some get away with being rude by rhett o rick Mar 2013 #165
Where do you have to sit when you're the stalker? And, no Cha Mar 2013 #145
If you read my posts you would know I dont condone stalking. That should be dealt with rhett o rick Mar 2013 #161
She didn't have to "rationalize" being righteous. It was Cha Mar 2013 #164
Prosense proves his case against you and anyone on DU should give a shit about YOUR OPINION? KittyWampus Mar 2013 #102
I enjoy reading the defense of any attack on Obama. Very creative. n-t Logical Mar 2013 #106
+1. Cat's out of the bag, now! grahamhgreen Mar 2013 #153
They almost did it, huh? woo me with science Mar 2013 #159
tell me what is going on, Woo Skittles Mar 2013 #184
Of course they would. woo me with science Mar 2013 #191
but what is their INCENTIVE to support this crap? Skittles Mar 2013 #200
Are there? woo me with science Mar 2013 #203
And now we get to the heart of the matter. WHEN CRABS ROAR Mar 2013 #213
HOWDY WHEN CRABS ROAR Skittles Mar 2013 #220
That's a long time and a long view. woo me with science Mar 2013 #244
I have always seen things way ahead of the pack Skittles Mar 2013 #221
Me too, and I don't like what I see coming. WHEN CRABS ROAR Mar 2013 #223
I am with you WCR Skittles Mar 2013 #225
+10000 woo me with science Mar 2013 #245
I was once approached my a major software producer Marr Mar 2013 #248
It's easier for some to follow a person than principles. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #285
I understand the glamour over substance thing Skittles Apr 2013 #310
I believe it's a reality thing. They want to believe because they need to rhett o rick Apr 2013 #311
jury results: Whisp Mar 2013 #50
Awesome jury result... SidDithers Mar 2013 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author Scurrilous Jul 2013 #330
Alerting L0oniX Mar 2013 #118
OMG - that jury was totally slanted to the left! grahamhgreen Mar 2013 #155
You certainly have a Bobbie Jo Mar 2013 #61
Did DU loose it's ignore function when it changed to updated version? That would solve that for you. KittyWampus Mar 2013 #107
Response in wrong place?...nt SidDithers Mar 2013 #114
? Bobbie Jo Mar 2013 #116
Holy Crap! In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #76
The second one is really telling. MineralMan Mar 2013 #79
For every accusation of working for the WH treestar Mar 2013 #104
LOL, as if that isn't a regular accusation. Marr Mar 2013 #249
Come on Pro, keep it civil, we all know you work somewhere! And we still love ya, might disagree grahamhgreen Mar 2013 #152
Evidently, some people think they're clever. ProSense Mar 2013 #160
Dunning-Kruger Electric Monk Mar 2013 #241
Hubris. grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #276
Irony Electric Monk Apr 2013 #278
Why do you think Obama has appointed Monsanto CEOs to positions of sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #263
And evidently some need you to explain Obama's appointments, as if you are the man himself Number23 Apr 2013 #269
I can't wait til your epiphany! grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #277
Dont hold your breath. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #316
And let's treat that question seriously. woo me with science Mar 2013 #7
The truth is a frustrating problem Heather MC Mar 2013 #10
It is all about the money. AndyA Mar 2013 #13
+1 green for victory Mar 2013 #18
+1. nt awoke_in_2003 Mar 2013 #21
If you are saying the problem is larger than him, I would agree. nm rhett o rick Mar 2013 #41
Obama is temporary. The problem is much larger. woo me with science Mar 2013 #49
The problem is huge, it's a corporate controlled government. Autumn Mar 2013 #67
If God didn't want corporations and the upper 1/10th percent to own the government. Fuddnik Mar 2013 #130
AMEN MotherPetrie Mar 2013 #74
"It is a problem that is threatening to end our country as we know it." dreampunk Mar 2013 #88
You are exactly right. nt woo me with science Mar 2013 #124
+ My household (Except we still rant after our brains kick in!) truedelphi Mar 2013 #216
The majority is hooked on Dancing With the Stars and sports WHEN CRABS ROAR Mar 2013 #217
^^^+1^^^This^^^ progressoid Mar 2013 #228
Amen brother! GitRDun Mar 2013 #231
Well said. blackspade Mar 2013 #257
Well said. ronnie624 Apr 2013 #272
Well said. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #8
I've been beaten up too much by the... SylviaD Mar 2013 #9
Yes you are, and don't fall for the incessant commercials. woo me with science Mar 2013 #31
Excellent. Nailed it ! Thanks... russspeakeasy Mar 2013 #44
thank you for pointing this out Slit Skirt Mar 2013 #63
This is an outstanding post. woo me with science Apr 2013 #299
thank you Slit Skirt Apr 2013 #329
woo me... choie Mar 2013 #73
Woo me with science tiredtoo Mar 2013 #77
Thank you. n/t SylviaD Mar 2013 #125
Very well stated. WHEN CRABS ROAR Mar 2013 #219
Home run. blackspade Apr 2013 #260
Well said. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #306
Don't let the bastards get you down pscot Mar 2013 #58
Thank you. n/t SylviaD Mar 2013 #126
... SidDithers Mar 2013 #62
...and those doing the beating up are getting known for it. L0oniX Mar 2013 #120
Thank you and I hope so. n/t SylviaD Mar 2013 #127
OP is now at the very top of the Greatest Page. woo me with science Apr 2013 #284
They snuck in and took those posts, nothing he could do. bahrbearian Mar 2013 #12
That is how I get. all my Jobs Heather MC Mar 2013 #20
he's just another go-along-to-get-along politico... KG Mar 2013 #14
The Director of NIFA is not Beachy. Article needs an update. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #15
k/r what would people here say if Romney appointed monsatan shills green for victory Mar 2013 #17
The final sentence in a book just popped in my head... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2013 #23
!!! Octafish Mar 2013 #46
Obama nominated Elena Kagan to the US Supreme Court. Kagan ProSense Mar 2013 #19
You may view the writing as Silly, however what about the facts? Heather MC Mar 2013 #24
My comment is ProSense Mar 2013 #25
She defended them Court, was obviously on their payroll Heather MC Mar 2013 #35
No, she was solicitor general and was required to as part of her job. OKNancy Mar 2013 #84
Facts like that conveniently get left out by right-wing libertarian sources like Naturalnews... SidDithers Mar 2013 #86
A Solicitor General who has no power and was required to make the agruments that she did? AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #109
Note woo me with science Mar 2013 #33
Note: The point stands. The OP is silly as hell ProSense Mar 2013 #40
Post removed Post removed Mar 2013 #91
I made the point that the OP article is silly. ProSense Mar 2013 #105
I see the "group" got the OP author kicked out of the thread for doing nothing more than they do. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #287
This thread is filled with marvelous examples woo me with science Apr 2013 #295
There seems to be a desperation involved. rhett o rick Apr 2013 #296
See post 31. woo me with science Apr 2013 #297
Yes excellent post. But I think it's more than that. Some live in a denial bubble. They dont want rhett o rick Apr 2013 #308
This one doesn't like facts. Jakes Progress Mar 2013 #138
I wouldn't work that hard bvar22 Mar 2013 #236
They must Jakes Progress Apr 2013 #326
Kagan sided with Rove Justice over Don Siegelman. Octafish Mar 2013 #51
Kagan participated in the death of the Miranda rule as the Solicitor General AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #115
Capitalism Cal Carpenter Mar 2013 #22
That is what I voted for CHANGE Heather MC Mar 2013 #30
And therein lies the rub Cal Carpenter Mar 2013 #55
Sadly most of us are all too trapped in the system Heather MC Mar 2013 #65
This is a really good answer I think. limpyhobbler Mar 2013 #90
+1 HiPointDem Mar 2013 #132
+1 woo me with science Apr 2013 #298
Exactly my thoughts... very well said.. mountain grammy Mar 2013 #57
I agree with you, Heather. Many are concerned. As if that matters. n/t truth2power Mar 2013 #26
He's fulfilling his promise to help the Middle Class MannyGoldstein Mar 2013 #28
Yes, ProSense Mar 2013 #37
Dazzle us with facts, ProSense... thanks! mountain grammy Mar 2013 #72
Apply Occum's Razor. 99Forever Mar 2013 #29
The original source is NaturalNews... SidDithers Mar 2013 #36
Meet Monsanto's number one lobbyist: Barack Obama ProSense Mar 2013 #42
And look at all the posters cheering and agreeing with the bullshit... SidDithers Mar 2013 #43
That's OK, the piece is from September 2012 ProSense Mar 2013 #45
Great flypaper thread tho... SidDithers Mar 2013 #53
Why did Obama appoint Monsanto CEOs to a Democratic Administration? sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #264
Yup. Catchin' flies all over the place...nt SidDithers Apr 2013 #266
Why would a Democratic president appoint Monsanto CEOS to his administration? sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #267
Looks like the "cool kids" got heather kicked out of her own thread. rhett o rick Apr 2013 #290
...and it's almost always he same predictable peanut gallery. Sheepshank Mar 2013 #52
Imagine how pissed these folks will be from 2016 to 2024 while ... JoePhilly Mar 2013 #56
They'll be pissed if any Democrat is President... SidDithers Mar 2013 #59
Agree ... particularly on the last point. nt. JoePhilly Mar 2013 #68
You two keep up the good work. Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #60
I apologize for not checking the source thoroughly Heather MC Mar 2013 #70
You should update your OP with the actual article... SidDithers Mar 2013 #75
Ok, sure Heather MC Mar 2013 #83
What an excellent question. woo me with science Apr 2013 #307
provenance is good - dreampunk Mar 2013 #92
But, but the 132 special souls that rec'd this tripe rep the TRUE American majority!!!1 Number23 Apr 2013 #270
Even worse... SidDithers Apr 2013 #273
There's enough straw in this thread to build a village. Bobbie Jo Apr 2013 #294
148 recs total. Chump change, even for DU despite the squeals from some who act as though Number23 Apr 2013 #313
He seems to believe in the rights of the filthy rich to become forestpath Mar 2013 #38
Yep that sums it up. And the Administration even lets us know truedelphi Mar 2013 #212
Probably Campaign Contribution Paybacks - aka Legalized Bribery cantbeserious Mar 2013 #48
And yet tiredtoo Mar 2013 #66
Maybe it is a plot to keep them out of the boardroom? ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2013 #71
Because he is a Reagan Conservative broadcaster75201 Mar 2013 #81
+1 Phlem Mar 2013 #255
because he is the face of corporate power. nt limpyhobbler Mar 2013 #82
Help Clean up Government !!! Maineman Mar 2013 #85
Neo Liberal, reagan democrat. Surely Jakes Progress Mar 2013 #87
Nonsensical bullshit. ProSense Mar 2013 #89
Knee jerk defense as expected Jakes Progress Mar 2013 #136
More nonsense. n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #140
Even less substance. Jakes Progress Mar 2013 #143
Well said. There is one sure way to cut through the bullshit, always. woo me with science Mar 2013 #174
The "defenders" Jakes Progress Apr 2013 #325
Replace "Monsanto" with "Goldman Sachs" and "food" with "economic" in this sentence... Agony Mar 2013 #93
+ every human soul who has ever agreed with Occupy! n/t truedelphi Mar 2013 #187
Keep your friends close... IthinkThereforeIAM Mar 2013 #94
Rappaports 2013 blog is not the original source for the article... SidDithers Mar 2013 #96
I am not bashing Obama. I don't 100% agree with my husband that Heather MC Mar 2013 #97
Yeah, sure... SidDithers Mar 2013 #99
I wasn't aware of that at the time I posted this Heather MC Mar 2013 #111
Don't let Sid bully you. The OP was fine and you corrected it. Thanks for the OP. n-t Logical Mar 2013 #113
Sorry, nothing from naturalnews or jon rappapport is "fine"...nt SidDithers Mar 2013 #131
Well, you might not like the source, kurtzapril4 Mar 2013 #166
You're right. I don't like right-wing, crazy-ass, conspiracist libertarians... SidDithers Mar 2013 #169
"Right-wing": woo me with science Mar 2013 #182
Are you denying Jon Rappaport, the author of the material in the OP, is right wing?... SidDithers Mar 2013 #183
Note the attempt to deflect. woo me with science Mar 2013 #190
Note the attempt to evade the question... SidDithers Mar 2013 #194
LOL! woo me with science Mar 2013 #196
That's all you got?... SidDithers Mar 2013 #197
Bullshit, fuck the question, the correct answer is, WHEN CRABS ROAR Mar 2013 #222
Another vote for Paul-loving, anti-vax, AIDS-denying, right-wing Libertarians checks in... SidDithers Mar 2013 #227
Hear, hear! woo me with science Mar 2013 #243
It's hard to believe, but there are Monsanto Supporters here on DU it appears. sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #265
I believe the question is "why is our President appointing so many Monsanto supporters?" nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #286
no, woo was disputing the fact that Jon Rappaport... SidDithers Apr 2013 #288
Yes a clever distraction. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #289
And you seem to be another poster who thinks this guy... SidDithers Apr 2013 #291
I support free discussion here in DU and object at attempts of those that rhett o rick Apr 2013 #292
Rappaport is the author of the unsourced material... SidDithers Apr 2013 #293
Why now? ProSense Mar 2013 #101
It's not just Obama davidthegnome Mar 2013 #100
Oh please, what you are saying is not even logical. truedelphi Apr 2013 #328
Because they are qualified for the job. treestar Mar 2013 #108
"Maybe the FDA should be run by DU." LOL... SidDithers Mar 2013 #112
Monsanto will be able to rule Smilo Mar 2013 #110
Modern politics is all a "good cop bad cop" game. L0oniX Mar 2013 #119
Love Obama, but have often been troubled by his appointments. Disappointing. gateley Mar 2013 #128
It's Bush's fault pediatricmedic Mar 2013 #137
K&R Despite the gang of four (or five) Jakes Progress Mar 2013 #142
Irony ProSense Mar 2013 #147
"You keep using that word. I don't . . . Jakes Progress Mar 2013 #156
You ProSense Mar 2013 #158
I Jakes Progress Apr 2013 #324
Bcause of tiny electrodes implanted in the brain? nt LiberalEsto Mar 2013 #146
Because he is a soft sell shill for corporations, and everyone must realize that. Hence, we must be grahamhgreen Mar 2013 #151
"diligent in pushing him and his corporate cronies and think tank trolls that hit these boards." ProSense Mar 2013 #167
No. We need you folks on our side! ;-) grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #275
Obama fails: the list keeps getting longer by the week. grr. ~nt 99th_Monkey Mar 2013 #162
No, President Obama has NOT failed.. and the list of his Accomplishments Keep Growing.. Cha Mar 2013 #250
Yes, President Obama has done everything he promised 99th_Monkey Apr 2013 #317
Please add: bvar22 Apr 2013 #319
WOW. Very interesting timing 99th_Monkey Apr 2013 #320
There ARE no coinkidinkies. bvar22 Apr 2013 #322
He's not failing at all. He is aggressively and successfully implementing woo me with science Apr 2013 #301
You had me going 99th_Monkey Apr 2013 #318
Rec'd, even though this isn't a vacuous kitty cartoon on a political site just1voice Mar 2013 #163
Because he has been bought and paid for. roody Mar 2013 #168
Because Monsanto is the most evil corporation ever Progressive dog Mar 2013 #173
+1 wtmusic Apr 2013 #268
An Obama appointee from DC had Easter dinner with us emsimon33 Mar 2013 #176
Oh like Gay Marriage, gun control, and Cha Mar 2013 #181
More from Jon Rappaport... SidDithers Mar 2013 #178
I was already aware of these appointments G_j Mar 2013 #186
The USDA/ NIFA accusation is total BS... here's the real person: farmbo Mar 2013 #246
And you won't get one, either. kurtzapril4 Mar 2013 #251
He is simply following the Clinton Doctrine of Total Solvency after an individual leaves the truedelphi Mar 2013 #185
I tried to rec your topic, but the rec feature truedelphi Mar 2013 #188
On edit: Glad you got it to work. woo me with science Mar 2013 #206
"important thread"... SidDithers Mar 2013 #207
The ones that are unimportant woo me with science Mar 2013 #210
"This is an important thread." ProSense Mar 2013 #208
Because if you "hoped" there'd be a "change" from corporate ownership of our government... you were villager Mar 2013 #192
We all did hope there'd be change, and that was exactly right - truedelphi Mar 2013 #211
Need more recs for the greatest page! n-t Logical Mar 2013 #195
Several things: jazzimov Mar 2013 #204
Again, thank you, jazzimov.. for bringing facts and logic Cha Mar 2013 #230
BTW one of the most well established critics of Gm food is truedelphi Mar 2013 #215
GMOs go nice with a jigger of fracking water. blkmusclmachine Mar 2013 #218
the stupid has been stinking for a LONG time now Skittles Mar 2013 #224
110 Recs... SidDithers Mar 2013 #234
121 now! Thanks for the bump! n-t Logical Mar 2013 #253
Proud to support Jon Rappaport, are you?... SidDithers Apr 2013 #259
I wish Obama would grow some balls and Reid would grow a spine. Crowman1979 Mar 2013 #235
That assumes they aren't doing exactly what they want to do n/t markpkessinger Apr 2013 #274
This is a rhetorical question, right? nt dflprincess Mar 2013 #240
Great Post Heather!! supercats Mar 2013 #242
USA hasn't had a president since Kennedy with any real power. ConcernedCanuk Mar 2013 #252
Yeah, um...I voted for Kucinich. n/t flvegan Mar 2013 #256
He also hired Sempra Energy's former lobbyist as Deputy Director of the Interior Dept. Liberty Belle Apr 2013 #271
+1 Thank you. nt woo me with science Apr 2013 #279
Whew! You seem to have opened another can of worms here... ReRe Apr 2013 #280
Not a lot of controversy. woo me with science Apr 2013 #281
You're probably right, wmws... ReRe Apr 2013 #283
+1000 Logical Apr 2013 #321
Appointments are typically the persons thought best to get the job done indepat Apr 2013 #302
Yes, and Obama's corporate appointments make it crystal clear woo me with science Apr 2013 #303
It's all so simple when actions taken are viewed in context of the whole indepat Apr 2013 #312
because he fucking lied to us DiverDave Apr 2013 #315
Because there are only so many former Goldman Sachs executives. nt Common Sense Party Apr 2013 #327
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why does President Obama ...»Reply #31