Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
59. I'm not so worried about the exception in general.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:21 AM
Apr 2013

I'm more worried about the individual suspect, and how he will be treated in a city that hates him. As written, the exception's not terrible. In practice, it will be very easy to use to cover other corner-cutting, I'm afraid.

And we'll never know, which makes the OP come across as willfully obtuse (never mind the holier-than-thou). That's a shame, because as far as it goes, the OP's correct.

I dare you to read this. [View all] WilliamPitt Apr 2013 OP
They prefer screaming at the President to reading. MjolnirTime Apr 2013 #1
Sad but damn true in many of these cases. n/t AverageJoe90 Apr 2013 #50
K & R Tree-Hugger Apr 2013 #2
You don't have to dare me frazzled Apr 2013 #3
I have been wondering...... W_HAMILTON Apr 2013 #8
It always exists. Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #23
So, in the hypothetical situation from my earlier post... W_HAMILTON Apr 2013 #26
Miranda applies only to custodial interrogation. The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2013 #61
Exactly, thanks for taking time to find and post that case treestar Apr 2013 #4
"I dare you to read this", 5 times, wow do you love the drama. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #5
So pissing and moaning Cirque du So-What Apr 2013 #10
As far as I can tell, you are projecting when it comes to "drama" emulatorloo Apr 2013 #16
Not far I see. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #17
"Not far I see." WilliamPitt Apr 2013 #31
LOL, good point. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #34
It is obviously for effect and emphasis. GoneOffShore Apr 2013 #30
For government haters it doesn't matter. Damned if they do, damned if they don't. kelliekat44 Apr 2013 #6
You weren't talking to me, but frogmarch Apr 2013 #7
Good post...nt SidDithers Apr 2013 #9
Which means in practice... Spider Jerusalem Apr 2013 #11
But in reality it probably won't. alarimer Apr 2013 #37
Nice post Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #12
You can't reason with ideologues emulatorloo Apr 2013 #13
or this bigtree Apr 2013 #14
Directly contradicted in the above Spider Jerusalem Apr 2013 #18
yes it is bigtree Apr 2013 #22
You're describing the situation as if there was no exemption. (nt) jeff47 Apr 2013 #40
Cue Clichéd, Poorly Understood Ben Franklin quotation in 5...4....3...2... alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #15
Gosh, that's not a slippery slope. Bucky Apr 2013 #19
Here is another opinion that explains why this "Exception" is not a good idea..... Logical Apr 2013 #20
That piece is ProSense Apr 2013 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Amonester Apr 2013 #21
Civil Defense Vs. Civil Liberties...Perils Of An Open Society... KharmaTrain Apr 2013 #24
I thought Obama had to read him his rights personnally. WTF? panader0 Apr 2013 #25
And if he is too injured to be questioned within 48 hours? B2G Apr 2013 #27
Then they can't ask questions without Mirandizing. jeff47 Apr 2013 #42
I thought they only had 48 hours n/t B2G Apr 2013 #47
The exception only lasts 48 hours. jeff47 Apr 2013 #51
Got it. Thank you! n/t B2G Apr 2013 #52
Some people here fit the stereotype painted of all liberals by right wing media. alphafemale Apr 2013 #29
Taking the instructions of Jesus Christ to heart is now "stereotypical liberal" Fumesucker Apr 2013 #38
quick now...what did this Jesus person say should happen to people that harmed children? nt alphafemale Apr 2013 #39
No problem here. proud2BlibKansan Apr 2013 #32
Has anyone checked on Glenn Greenwald? JaneyVee Apr 2013 #33
LOL! KittyWampus Apr 2013 #57
Well thanks for bringing it to my attention a2liberal Apr 2013 #35
How is it a violation of the Constitution WilliamPitt Apr 2013 #36
So you think courts always role correctly on the Constitution? (n/t) a2liberal Apr 2013 #56
I think it should all be left up to anonymous internet outrage junkies. WilliamPitt Apr 2013 #63
Don't worry, I won't a2liberal Apr 2013 #65
More context nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #41
I would not have a problem with the pse if it had not come about Zorra Apr 2013 #43
Thank you. Good infomation. tavalon Apr 2013 #44
Now you've done it. AtomicKitten Apr 2013 #45
Thank you. moonlady0623 Apr 2013 #46
One thing about the OP: Zorra Apr 2013 #48
What fascinates me about these discussions, has nothing to do with Miranda rights Dragonfli Apr 2013 #49
You are right on the money nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #54
K&R cliffordu Apr 2013 #53
letting the last statement in screams of a judge unwilling to do his job dsc Apr 2013 #55
Unfortunately for you and the rest of the ticking bomb exceptionalists, Warren Stupidity Apr 2013 #58
I'm not so worried about the exception in general. Orsino Apr 2013 #59
I find it farcical that the mere reading of his rights would be the disaster it has been portrayed Warren Stupidity Apr 2013 #60
Okay. I read the links. LWolf Apr 2013 #62
Kick...nt SidDithers Apr 2013 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I dare you to read this.»Reply #59