Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Incoming NRA President Calls Civil War The ‘War Of Northern Aggression’ [View all]bullwinkle428
(20,628 posts)4. So along with the President, he singles out one other prominent member
of the administration who happens to be "of color".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Incoming NRA President Calls Civil War The ‘War Of Northern Aggression’ [View all]
Blue_Tires
May 2013
OP
I always assumed "racist idiot" is a top-5 requirement for any NRA president candidate. nt
tridim
May 2013
#1
He IS the NRA and the gun fans nationwide. The poster person. It is Jim Porter. He is all of them.
graham4anything
May 2013
#3
"Where are our DU NRA apologists ..." Obviously, none exist except in your imagination.
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#13
As false as the McCarthy tactic of calling opponents "communists or communist sympathizers."
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#25
If facts supported your position, you wouldn't have to resort to name calling as a diversion.
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#32
There have been Gungeon threads where DU Gun Enthusiasts proclaimed their NRA memberships.
Paladin
May 2013
#45
If you have to engage in name calling, and McCarthy did that, you've lost.
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#55
As false as the McCarthy tactic of calling opponents "communists or communist sympathizers."
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#24
When a rock is thrown into a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one that got hit.
Ikonoklast
May 2013
#19
As false as the McCarthy tactic of calling opponents "communists or communist sympathizers."
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#26
As false as the McCarthy tactic of calling opponents "communists or communist sympathizers."
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#23
If facts supported your position, you wouldn't have to resort to name calling as a diversion.
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#31
But, there are millions of free-riders (too cheap to pay dues?) who benefit from NRA gun propaganda.
Hoyt
May 2013
#36
Today, the Nugents, Norquists, LaPierres, Boltons, Norths, gun profiteers, etc., have taken over.
Hoyt
May 2013
#41
Who cares how they started. It's like saying Lincoln freed the slaves, so Republicans aren't racists
Hoyt
May 2013
#57
RW extremists use that sort of info to con normal people to believe that they're really not so bad.
baldguy
May 2013
#69
When it's intended to paint a false image of a current RW extremist group? Yes, very definitely.
baldguy
May 2013
#81
I guess you're embarrassed to be exposed as a member of a known radical extremist RW organization.
baldguy
May 2013
#92
Well, part of it is that for some reason it took until Sandy Hook for NRA membership to be
geek tragedy
May 2013
#85
This thread deserves to be on the front page forever because of this one reply.
2ndAmForComputers
Sep 2013
#97
Better headline: "Incoming NRA President defends Holocaust against minorities"
Dawson Leery
May 2013
#34
My granparents from Alabama always called it the "War Between the States", but never the
pampango
May 2013
#49
Even better headline: "Incoming NRA President Advocates Treason in Defense of Slavery"
meow2u3
May 2013
#67