Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sun Jul 7, 2013, 11:14 AM Jul 2013

Would you rather have a pipeline spill or a train derailment? [View all]

Obviously neither, but oil pipelines suck. Rail transport of oil sucks. Our dependency on oil isn't going away anytime soon.

What's the solution?

The IAE says that rail incidents are more frequent but pipeline incidents spill considerably more oil. Rail accidents pose a greater risk to life.

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/05/14/pipeline-oil-spills-rail-spills_n_3273725.html


More and more oil is being transported by rail and the route is often on dilapidated infrastructure near population centers. That's clearly not tenable.


http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-06-13/amid-u-dot-s-dot-oil-boom-railroads-are-beating-pipelines-in-crude-transport

http://www.pembina.org/blog/732

This is just bad news any which way you look at it.


19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you rather have a p...