General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do you think the jury got it right or wrong? [View all]Decoy of Fenris
(1,954 posts)There are too many scenarios that may or may not have been in play. Z, while in his legal right to follow Martin, was displaying incredibly poor judgment. Having no evidence that Z had ill-intention, and having no evidence regarding who initiated physical conflict, and lacking evidence of motive, the jury, in my mind, rightfully found a lack of evidence and therefore reasonable doubt that Z acted "Recklessly", given the lack of knowledge of critical variables.
TL;DR version: Too much unknown, not enough evidence against Z.
Z got away with murder, no doubt, but our system of law operates to prevent convictions of people who -may be- innocent. Zimmerman just got lucky that there was no evidence against him, otherwise he'd be locked away by now.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):