Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 "alternative" theories and "conspiracies" [View all]dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)2. MIHOP need not be controlled demolition
Why not MIHOP with actual jihadis flying actual planes into the WTC? There is a large tangled web, including money, between the U.S. gov and the Saudis who carried out the attack. The pentagon attack could have been a plane or a missile, either way still could have been MIHOP.
I never got why controlled demolition was the cornerstone of MIHOP.
We don't have better air defenses than that in the beltway? Really? Bandar smoking cigars with Bush in D.C. on 9/12? Odd, that. The odd goes on and on, you'd have to believe in some crazy coincidence theory to believe the official story, much like the Kennedy assassination.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs'
RandiFan1290
Sep 2013
#7
i don't find it credible that an operation of that sophistication (official version) was planned
KG
Sep 2013
#10
Those are all good points. The sole exception was the Flt. 77 pilot who exercised skill
leveymg
Sep 2013
#24
All that can really be proven is Bush and Tenet Let It Happen (LIH). But, that was enough to indict
leveymg
Sep 2013
#11
Here we go again. Devolve DU into a bunch of half-ass theorists. Welcome to DU-Infowars!
7962
Sep 2013
#16
+1 -- and this post means I don't have to serve on any juries on this thread. ;) n/t
X_Digger
Sep 2013
#32