Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
2. MIHOP need not be controlled demolition
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 06:11 AM
Sep 2013

Why not MIHOP with actual jihadis flying actual planes into the WTC? There is a large tangled web, including money, between the U.S. gov and the Saudis who carried out the attack. The pentagon attack could have been a plane or a missile, either way still could have been MIHOP.

I never got why controlled demolition was the cornerstone of MIHOP.

We don't have better air defenses than that in the beltway? Really? Bandar smoking cigars with Bush in D.C. on 9/12? Odd, that. The odd goes on and on, you'd have to believe in some crazy coincidence theory to believe the official story, much like the Kennedy assassination.

And off you go! OffWithTheirHeads Sep 2013 #1
I was watching the morning shows on television when the first plane hit. In_The_Wind Sep 2013 #22
MIHOP need not be controlled demolition dreamnightwind Sep 2013 #2
Agree. It's all about the money trail. Norrin Radd Sep 2013 #8
+1 grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #28
Well, here we go again. longship Sep 2013 #3
Damn the BFEE!!!! greytdemocrat Sep 2013 #12
I think MIHOP is not so implausible. Jerry442 Sep 2013 #4
+1 Norrin Radd Sep 2013 #9
PNAC and its manifestos on the Middle East before 9/11 GreenEyedLefty Sep 2013 #5
They LIHOP, at least. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #6
I'm in the LIHOP camp as well, Hayabusa Sep 2013 #30
'either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs' RandiFan1290 Sep 2013 #7
i don't find it credible that an operation of that sophistication (official version) was planned KG Sep 2013 #10
The 911 plotters were college educated men using modern technology. hack89 Sep 2013 #14
THANK YOU hack! 7962 Sep 2013 #17
Those are all good points. The sole exception was the Flt. 77 pilot who exercised skill leveymg Sep 2013 #24
Absolutely. Over the years I have gone from accepting the snappyturtle Sep 2013 #18
With you - TBF Sep 2013 #21
All that can really be proven is Bush and Tenet Let It Happen (LIH). But, that was enough to indict leveymg Sep 2013 #11
IBL. nt Javaman Sep 2013 #13
LIHOP theorist here. MoonRiver Sep 2013 #15
I started out MIHOP, moved over to LIHOP PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #33
Here we go again. Devolve DU into a bunch of half-ass theorists. Welcome to DU-Infowars! 7962 Sep 2013 #16
So much this. nt sufrommich Sep 2013 #19
Perhaps you should have read the whole OP blackspade Sep 2013 #31
Trash thread. Iggo Sep 2013 #20
+1 -- and this post means I don't have to serve on any juries on this thread. ;) n/t X_Digger Sep 2013 #32
Speculating and Testing freedom fighter jh Sep 2013 #23
Nicely written! blackspade Sep 2013 #25
I distinctly remember watching the news on the night of 911... Larry Ogg Sep 2013 #26
Hanlon's Razor DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #27
and 12 years later and still no evidence..no leaks, just tools with a puter- snooper2 Sep 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»9/11 "alternative&qu...»Reply #2