And I distinctly remember the "conversations on the news" about demolishing building 7 prior to its collapse.
They even gave a thirty minute warning!
And when it came down there was no big surprise, because they knew it was coming down.
So the question I have is this... Why did they Chang the story? Could it be that they changed the story because, and I'm guessing now, someone high up in the history rewriting department was asked a not so stupid questions.
1. Why do demolition companies take months and months of meticulous planning and prepping prior to the actual demolition date.
And 2. Where could you find a demolition crew on such a short notice, that was stupid enough to carry tons of high explosives into a burning building, and then properly place and wire the explosives in just a few hours time, even though that kind of job takes months and months to compleat evin when their not working in a burning building.
In other words, if building 7 was demolished buy a demolition crew, the explosives had to have been put in place, and wired to explode prior to 911. So I'm guessing that not even the best of the best history rewright conartist could convince anyone, other then the take your breath away stupid crowd, that 911 was not an inside job.
Oh but what luck for the guilty rulers, that the story changed so quickly, for the truth so unimaginably painful, when changed soon enough.., eyes and ears will soon forget what was really seen and heard.
Besides, a history rewritten is far more palatable then a truth that exposes an evil that could not otherwise be imagined, so go back to sleep if you must, and believe whatever the leaders and rewrights tell you. But do remember this old saying... "Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it."
= new reply since forum marked as read
