Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

petronius

(26,602 posts)
19. That's a very interesting blog (Prof. Kahan seems to object to calling it a "study"),
Sun Oct 20, 2013, 10:57 PM
Oct 2013

but one bit that struck me as particularly intriguing - and a valuable warning - was this:

But because they are like everyone else, these high "science comprehending" tea-party members will be more likely to display politically biased misinterpretations of empirical data than people who display a lower "science comprehension" apptitude. The greater their capacity to engage in analytical thinking, the more systematically they will use that capacity to ferret out evidence congenial to their predispositions and block out and rationalize away everything else.

Moreover, because others who share their values very sensibly rely on them when trying to keep up with what’s known to science, these high science-comprehending tea-party members -- just like high science-comprehending "Democrats" and "Republicans'" and "libertarians" and "socialists" et al.-- will play a principal role in transmitting the reason-effacing pathogens that pervade our polluted science communication environment.

http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2013/10/19/congratulations-tea-party-members-you-are-just-as-vulnerable.html
Did you mean less? And is the link right? rainy Oct 2013 #1
I added some links... Walk away Oct 2013 #3
I suspect that quite a few participating in the survey answered opposite of brewens Oct 2013 #11
At first, I thought WTF when I looked at that chart. Curmudgeoness Oct 2013 #2
So what is your doctorate in? whistler162 Oct 2013 #4
I don't have a doctorate. Did I imply that I did? Walk away Oct 2013 #6
The chart says exactly the opposite of the OP. Coyotl Oct 2013 #5
I'm sorry it's hard to understand. That is my point. Walk away Oct 2013 #9
The 3R's. They know the answers expected in a test. Memorization. Tigress DEM Oct 2013 #12
Yep. And that is a major part of the reason... YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #14
But there is a certain intelligence to knowing both sides of the argument. Tigress DEM Oct 2013 #15
can't expose the "common" folk to "dangerous ideas" like critical thinking, etc. BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #16
Haha, thanks! YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #18
One study does not prove anything. 4bucksagallon Oct 2013 #7
"Nonetheless, there is reason to believe that strict right-wing ideology Dark n Stormy Knight Oct 2013 #20
I do know older people who got advanced degrees a long time ago treestar Oct 2013 #8
Now that makes perfect sense. Turbineguy Oct 2013 #10
What a biased load of crap seattle15 Oct 2013 #13
The only reason Tea Party supporters might score above average is because of SES YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #17
That's a very interesting blog (Prof. Kahan seems to object to calling it a "study"), petronius Oct 2013 #19
...than a gerbil....on acid. nt Wounded Bear Oct 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Yale professor's study ...»Reply #19