Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 10:41 PM Nov 2013

Would you approve of Hillary's primary opponents using the Benghazi incident against her? [View all]

Obviously Hillary is a formidable candidate and it will take a lot to stop her. The temptation to exploit the Benghazi incident might be too much for a Martin O'Malley (for example) to resist.


7 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes. I want Hillary stopped, and if a primary opponent chooses to exploit Benghazi, so be it.
3 (43%)
No. That issue should be off-limits to Hillary's primary opponents.
4 (57%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think her primary opponents would be dead stupid to use Benghazi, winter is coming Nov 2013 #1
+100 JoePhilly Nov 2013 #8
+ 200 BlueCaliDem Nov 2013 #35
Never. That stategy is beneath us, and counterproductive in the end. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #2
Agree 100%. HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #11
someone, popcorn! NOW NightWatcher Nov 2013 #3
... bunnies Nov 2013 #20
Yes, absolutely LittleBlue Nov 2013 #4
Survey says.....#1 answer! /nt demwing Nov 2013 #9
but it gives legitimacy to an illegitimate issue Motown_Johnny Nov 2013 #15
The moment they tried, their candidacy would be down the tubes scheming daemons Nov 2013 #5
No and I would be very angry at the candidate. hrmjustin Nov 2013 #6
Your choices are a bit strange. ZombieHorde Nov 2013 #7
The Dem candidate that tries to do that Gman Nov 2013 #10
Not the incident itself, but the fact that Sec. Rice was put out front Motown_Johnny Nov 2013 #12
Are you aware that the WH made the decision of who to send to the talk shows? Beacool Nov 2013 #16
here's what happened AtomicKitten Nov 2013 #22
That did stick out like a sore thumb... Whisp Nov 2013 #32
If the situation was reversed, do you believe that oneshooter Nov 2013 #13
After pulling Farrakhan out of the air AtomicKitten Nov 2013 #19
Trick question...there won't be any Primary opponents... brooklynite Nov 2013 #14
I won't like it but of course they will use it. nt arthritisR_US Nov 2013 #17
Going after Hillary on Benghazi is akin to going after the president. Beacool Nov 2013 #18
As I was saying................ Beacool Nov 2013 #36
Absent some development to make it a legit issue, no cthulu2016 Nov 2013 #21
No, because the idea of a "Benghazi Incident" itself is pure RW bullshit. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #23
Benghazi has become a right wing joke, i would question the seriousness of any candidate JI7 Nov 2013 #24
Exactly Rstrstx Nov 2013 #39
Why anyone who is a Democrat would want to stop her BootinUp Nov 2013 #25
Maybe prospective opponent should take their cue from Hillary's own actions tularetom Nov 2013 #26
Please excuse my ignorance but Phlem Nov 2013 #27
I wasn't aware that she would be running in a primary with Republicans and Tea Party folk. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2013 #28
It's a non issue Warpy Nov 2013 #29
Depends on how dirty She wants to fight. Whisp Nov 2013 #30
No, but I think going after other issues would be fairgame davidpdx Nov 2013 #31
Neither. Chan790 Nov 2013 #33
I'd RATHER see it taken care of in the primaries hughee99 Nov 2013 #34
No, but Madame 3 am phone call and fans have little room to whine. TheKentuckian Nov 2013 #37
Madame 3 am phone call was too tired to do her job Whisp Nov 2013 #40
There's going to be a primary? Fumesucker Nov 2013 #38
I don't want Hillary but what is there to use? PeteSelman Nov 2013 #41
without even reading the comments backwoodsbob Nov 2013 #42
Best response yet Bandit Nov 2013 #43
Do you consider the 5 DUers who voted "yes" to be "stupid"? Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #44
I stand by my post backwoodsbob Nov 2013 #47
No. I'd hold it against anyone who did. nt frogmarch Nov 2013 #45
There are so many better targets pasted to HRC, unless you are another conservative dem. HereSince1628 Nov 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you approve of Hill...