Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren Isn’t Running For President, Top Financial Backer Tells Democrats [View all]joeybee12
(56,177 posts)19. Really, I thought early 50's...
2016 is going to be nasty...the Repukes will nominate the NJ Bully or some Braindead Teabagger...Elizabteh might just not want to deal with such slime.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Elizabeth Warren Isn’t Running For President, Top Financial Backer Tells Democrats [View all]
WilliamPitt
Nov 2013
OP
I'm thinking about the 17 million Democrats who supported Hillary in 2008...
brooklynite
Nov 2013
#45
I was already sick of the engineered choices we had in the 2008 primaries...
cascadiance
Nov 2013
#57
I love Bernie. I would love to see Grayson talking about a run, too.
woo me with science
Nov 2013
#39
She signed the letter encouraging Hillary to run. Why are we talking about this? nt
onehandle
Nov 2013
#11
I think she realizes it would be tough in 2016 and wait and see who wins in 2016
joeybee12
Nov 2013
#24
Doesn't matter.. don't you see, you can just "recruit" her to run with MAGIC!
scheming daemons
Nov 2013
#22
I am going to wait until all the candidates that WANT to run announce....
scheming daemons
Nov 2013
#26
Interesting info, Will. But does that also mean you advocate not trying to find alternatives
BelgianMadCow
Nov 2013
#38
Why don't you offer us a case of these to get rid of the turds of both parties in DC now! n/t
cascadiance
Nov 2013
#60
Wouldn't Treasury Secretary or Chairman of the Federal Reserve be more within her scope?
Beacool
Nov 2013
#52
If we lose the Senate in 2014, what the hell does it matter? Nice to know DU's priorities are....
Tarheel_Dem
Nov 2013
#53