Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

booley

(3,855 posts)
28. In a weird way I think your post exemplifies the problem
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 03:24 PM
Mar 2014

(And no this isn't' saying yorupost was bad. I recc'ed it before replying.)

Your headline says you are now paying MORE. And lets face it, for many that's all they will read.

But you go on to say how your previous insurance wasn't' as good. I might even go as far as to say your old policy was junk. Which means even if you only paid a dollar it would still have been over priced.

And there's the problem. Too many saw their cheap policies and didn't' realize how they were getting screwed. They were paying for crap and only the fact that they hadn't gotten seriously ill yet allowed their ignorance to survive.

I imagine it's been the same whenever we get laws to fix a problem involving the markets. Certainly cars would be cheaper if they didn't' have to have all those safety requirements. I am sure many families would financially benefit if they could put their 10 year old to work in a factory. Think of how much lower the price of things would be if companies could just have slaves instead of paying workers a minimum wage?

Yes I'm being a bit hyperbolic but I think I made my point.

As a society we suck at cost analysis, that sometimes the more expensive thing is actually the better deal.

ANd I lay the blame on this administration. Yes the GOP and tea baggers lied but what else did we expect them to do?

The Obama administration didn't' seem to understand that insurance is complicated ( I had to have a friend who's a broker explain a lot to me when I was choosing a policy). That means they really didn't' spend as much time educating people as they should have. They didn't work to get people to understand who to compare their old policy with the new to see if maybe they were actually getting a better deal.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I hope you have your flame retardant suit on Glitterati Mar 2014 #1
Really? I didn't think I was being negative at all penultimate Mar 2014 #2
Why, of course you're not being negative Glitterati Mar 2014 #4
I don't think anyone here objects to a TRUTHFUL OP like this one. Walk away Mar 2014 #32
I don't see that you are being negative at all. Quess someone either didn't read your post or lumpy Mar 2014 #31
It will be great when we can get rid of insurance companies treestar Mar 2014 #3
Did you see where larger hospital chains are cutting out the middleman (insurance companies)? joeglow3 Mar 2014 #6
Yep, the ACA provides incentives for hospitals and physicians groups to set up their own insurance Hoyt Mar 2014 #26
Even if we had single payer, the insurance companies will still manage cbdo2007 Mar 2014 #13
I agree. BKH70041 Mar 2014 #15
Except the law is designed to prop-up the insurance corporations Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2014 #23
If they go belly up, that would not work, would it? treestar Mar 2014 #29
I have the same issue and understand what you are saying. peace13 Mar 2014 #5
I couldn't imagine paying $900/mo for insurance penultimate Mar 2014 #10
No that is just for one person. peace13 Mar 2014 #20
Or if you hit a max amout of services......one thing my stupid plan had. a kennedy Mar 2014 #7
I had insurance plans offered to me that had max payouts of $100,000 penultimate Mar 2014 #11
Same thing happened to a friend Freddie Mar 2014 #8
I had bypass surgery (6) Keefer Mar 2014 #12
Were you continuously insured? Glitterati Mar 2014 #14
As a small business they simply doubled the rates until you could not afford the insurance. peace13 Mar 2014 #21
Individual plans (not employer) had the pre-existing condition thing Freddie Mar 2014 #17
Ummm. I'm sorry but you're wrong Glitterati Mar 2014 #19
You're right Freddie Mar 2014 #24
AMEN Glitterati Mar 2014 #25
During congressional hearings Notafraidtoo Mar 2014 #36
"but I see how the insurance mandate can be viewed as a form of tax." Bandit Mar 2014 #9
PROOF: Medicare overhead is 3%, but private ins co's 20% overhead (w/o ACA it was much more) ErikJ Mar 2014 #16
Yes premiums have gone up for a few people. But on average more premiums have gone down. totodeinhere Mar 2014 #18
WE need to focus on those out there who are still paying the full load. peace13 Mar 2014 #22
Oh yes. This is only a start. There remains a lot of work to do and hopefully totodeinhere Mar 2014 #30
Here is an example. peace13 Mar 2014 #33
It probably would have been impossible to write the ACA so that at least some people totodeinhere Mar 2014 #34
Thanks for being so honest. Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #27
In a weird way I think your post exemplifies the problem booley Mar 2014 #28
You're paying more and you're getting more, as you are aware. pnwmom Mar 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My premium is about $100/...»Reply #28