Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 11:51 AM Apr 2014

"Winning the Pulitzer Vindicates NSA SPYING Revelations: Snowden Journalists Win Top Honor" [View all]

Guardian and Washington Post each honored with Pulitzer for Public Service
- Lauren McCauley, staff writer

The Washington Post and the Guardian/US were both awarded one of journalism's top honors on Monday—the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service— for their separate but related reporting on the NSA's widespread surveillance documents leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.




Ewen MacAskill, Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras in Hong Kong to meet NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden on June 10, 2013. (Photo by Laura Poitras)

Journalists Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras and Ewen MacAskill from the Guardian and the Washington Post's Barton Gellman sent shock waves across the globe for their reporting on the leaks—eliciting responses from citizens and governments alike and spurring a new era of backlash against government intrusion.

Following news of the honor, Snowden released a statement thanking the Pulitzer committee for recognizing those involved in the NSA reporting. He wrote:

Today's decision is a vindication for everyone who believes that the public has a role in government. We owe it to the efforts of the brave reporters and their colleagues who kept working in the face of extraordinary intimidation, including the forced destruction of journalistic materials, the inappropriate use of terrorism laws, and so many other means of pressure to get them to stop what the world now recognizes was work of vital public importance.

This decision reminds us that what no individual conscience can change, a free press can. My efforts would have been meaningless without the dedication, passion, and skill of these newspapers, and they have my gratitude and respect for their extraordinary service to our society. Their work has given us a better future and a more accountable democracy.



The Pulitzer committee awarded the prize to the publications for their "revelation[s] of widespread secret surveillance by the National Security Agency," specifying that the Guardian, "through aggressive reporting," helped "to spark a debate about the relationship between the government and the public over issues of security and privacy." They credited the Post for their "authoritative and insightful reports that helped the public understand how the disclosures fit into the larger framework of national security."

The Guardian team broke the first report on the NSA's collection of Verizon phone records and Gellman, with help from Poitras, reported on the wide-ranging surveillance program known as "PRISM." In addition to Greenwald, Poitras, MacAskill and Gellman—who are primarily credited for the NSA revelations—a number of other reporters working at the publications also contributed to the reporting that followed.

Following the announcement, many hailed the selection as a vindication of the actions of both the journalists and the whistleblower, a number of whom have been threatened for their work and are forced to remain in exile for fear of persecution by the U.S. government.

“The stories that came out of this completely changed the agenda on the discussion on privacy and the NSA,” David Remnick, editor of The New Yorker, said prior to the announcement. “There’s an enormous public good in that, and it’s yet to be proven at all that somehow did great damage to national security.”

"I can't imagine a more appropriate choice for a Pulitzer Prize," New York University media studies professor Mark Miller told AFP. Miller said that the winning team of reporters did what "American journalists are supposed to do, which is serve the public interest by shedding a bright light on egregious abuse of power by the government."

"The real journalistic heroes in this country tend to be the mavericks, the eccentrics, those who dare to report stories that are often dismissed derisively as 'conspiracy theory,'" Miller continued.

On Friday, Poitras and Greenwald returned to the U.S. for the first time since breaking the NSA stories to accept the prestigious George Polk Award for national security reporting.

During his acceptance speech for the George Polk award, Greenwald discussed the intimidation that both whistleblowers and journalists face.

"The only way to deal with threats," he said, "is to just do the reporting as aggressively, if not more so, than you would absent those threats."


_____________________
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K&R!! G_j Apr 2014 #1
I guess this shows that DU is not "the real world" BrotherIvan Apr 2014 #2
I have said nothing about this entire affair...until now. Whoever here who has a problem ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2014 #7
The people doing the mocking are of two general types: Maedhros Apr 2014 #10
I do ignore them. 840high Apr 2014 #13
Both types SHOULD be summarily ignored BrotherIvan Apr 2014 #14
I have put those posters on my ignore list, and it has completely transformed my DU experience. Maedhros Apr 2014 #17
You forgot ProSense Apr 2014 #23
Oh look. Here's one now. I think this one is a Type II. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2014 #25
Hear Hear! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2014 #18
Jail Them. Octafish Apr 2014 #3
Who... The NSA ??? WillyT Apr 2014 #4
No no no. The Secret Bosses who count. Votes. Octafish Apr 2014 #9
I'm tired Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #5
No be tired. Just drink more juice. Titan Size. Octafish Apr 2014 #11
Yes but there was no "actionable intelligence". zeemike Apr 2014 #16
LOL! More cats! Octafish Apr 2014 #19
It's amusing how absent the usually voracious critics have been in response to this news. SaveOurDemocracy Apr 2014 #6
Once they get the talking points BrotherIvan Apr 2014 #15
That's great, but can we get back to focusing on the personalities and not the main issue Rex Apr 2014 #8
I think it's much more important to get back to criticizing journalists Maedhros Apr 2014 #12
But... But... But... Glassunion Apr 2014 #20
This makes it really EASY to see WHO is on the WRONG side of this issue at DU: bvar22 Apr 2014 #21
However important this may be to the issue of our civil liberties - it is still NEVER, NEVER, NEVER Douglas Carpenter Apr 2014 #22
Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #24
We don't allow anyone to spew homophobic bullshit here. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2014 #26
Get your mind out of the gutter then. idendoit Apr 2014 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Winning the Pulitze...