Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Antivaccine versus anti-GMO: Different goals, same methods [View all]HuckleB
(35,773 posts)53. Do you continue to make claims that you cannot support?
That's a rhetorical question.
Do you continue to ignore the science?
That's a rhetorical question.
I'm only saying what you're showing. You can make all the claims you want. You showed that you didn't know what peer-reviewed research is. Thus, you don't know anything about this stuff. Your experiment was published where, and peer reviewed by whom?
You have a long history of pushing conspiracy, anti-science stuff.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I disagree. I think both attitudes are the result of unfounded fear based on bad science.
Buzz Clik
Jun 2013
#8
I'm still skeptical of GMO's and trying to educate myself on this subject.
mountain grammy
Jun 2013
#13
Similar invective was used for those opposed to the unabated use of fossil fuels
whatchamacallit
Jun 2013
#23