Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Two Words explain why the ACA is fatally flawed. Hobby Lobby. [View all]
By further embedding private insurance and the employer-base system into the healthcare system and making it mandatory -- WITH NO WAY OUT -- the ACA opened the door to this kind of crap, and worse.
We should have offered some form of universally affordable and available public social insurance -- at least the option for it -- when we had a chance.
Healthcare should not be tied to jobs, and it should not be subject to the whims of employers or Big Insurance with no alternatives available.
125 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

There was a reason Obama was hving secret back room meetings with the insurance companies
cui bono
Jun 2014
#23
I don't disagree with you other than the only reason the ACA passed is because it is a boon for
cui bono
Jun 2014
#44
Brilliant! Let's see there morals in action and make them pay to the balls!-nt
Anansi1171
Jun 2014
#78
We did not need the ACA to expand medicaid and increase funding to the states
Puzzledtraveller
Jul 2014
#106
And your handy magic wand would have magically gotten that passed in Congress.
KittyWampus
Jun 2014
#12
It's so discouraging that the PTB have convinced people that corporations are our friends
Doctor_J
Jul 2014
#121
Good, so you have heard the facts and the political reality. If only your magic wand
KittyWampus
Jun 2014
#11
So which people in the Senate would have gone for universal coverage? Liberman? Bayh? Nelson(Neb)
lostincalifornia
Jul 2014
#104
I wish you would start an OP with your post. And your last question is a valuable philosophical
KittyWampus
Jun 2014
#13
If you live in a Red State your options for Planned Parenthood are greatly limited...
Javaman
Jun 2014
#39
As for the rest of it, it will be lobbied away over the years. Except for the mandate. Fact is,
grahamhgreen
Jun 2014
#10
we did our best - voted for the president who said he would INSIST on a public option
Doctor_J
Jun 2014
#56
At least a generation is an awfully long time to not have SP or a PO enacted.
Louisiana1976
Jun 2014
#65
It is when other perspectives and alternatives are purposefully left out in order to light hairs on
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#38
Unfortunately in Massacusetts it's still convoluted mess with no relief in sight
Armstead
Jun 2014
#24
We could all just move to another country too but that doesn't addresss the issue.
cui bono
Jul 2014
#95
Working a lot better than telling women to just get another job or buy their own insurance.
cui bono
Jul 2014
#100
No. What is flawed is the perverse attitude toward sexx held by the Catholic Five on
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#42
Yep. the now mandatory for-profit insurers and your employers have even more control
Doctor_J
Jun 2014
#45
Perhaps as flawed as we could get. Our global grades aren't going to rocket up the charts.
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#68
A great deal of fixing would come just from states like Texas expanding Medicaid.
geek tragedy
Jun 2014
#76
right after you notice that your argument is based on refusal to admit the DC Dems screwed this up,
Doctor_J
Jul 2014
#85
You go ahead and keep saying there's nothing wrong with forcing religious beliefs on women
cui bono
Jul 2014
#99
"We should have. . . " "Should have" and "would have" are limited by "could have."
pnwmom
Jun 2014
#79
"You can't just take a shitload of insurance companies and drive them into the sea"
nationalize the fed
Jul 2014
#87
I think those so-called "Roman Catholics" aren't living a life in imitation of the
MADem
Jul 2014
#115
We can only hope some of them have to retire during our next Dem POTUSes two terms.
Rex
Jul 2014
#119
Actually you are not correct. An accommodation was already made for groups who oppose this on
lostincalifornia
Jul 2014
#105
I am not saying the ACA is socialized medicine, of course it isn't. What I am saying is with things
lostincalifornia
Jul 2014
#120
The design of employer based healthcare left the door open for the SC to do that
Armstead
Jul 2014
#124