Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Now I am confused about DU (a different answer to cali's OP) [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(106,618 posts)75. A ton of feathers would not hold together; it would not crush you
Yes, there is a difference between the parties. Republicans want to repeal the ACA. They want to slash public spending on everything except defence. They want to restrict contraception, and abolish abortion. They want to have a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Their foreign policy 'experts' want to bomb every country they have a disagreement with. They think climate change is a 'hoax'.
Democratic leaders are far from perfect, but they are sane human beings. Republican politicians are, collectively, insane, and inhuman. Consider the Texas Republican party platform:
Homosexuality is a chosen behavior that is contrary to the fundamental unchanging truths that have been ordained by God in the Bible, recognized by our nations founders, and shared by the majority of Texans. Homosexuality must not be presented as an acceptable alternative lifestyle, in public policy, nor should family be redefined to include homosexual couples. We believe there should be no granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for homosexual behavior, regardless of state of origin.
Furthermore:
We recognize the legitimacy and efficacy of counseling, which offers reparative therapy and treatment for those patients seeking healing and wholeness from their homosexual lifestyle. No laws or executive orders shall be imposed to limit or restrict access to this type of therapy.
Gays are here to stay, even in Texas, but there are plenty of things that Texas Republicans plan to do away with entirelyor, to use their preferred word, things they would subject to abolishment. (For Calhoun conservatives, I suppose, abolition has regrettable overtones.) A partial list:
Personal-income taxes
Property taxes
Estate taxes
Capital-gains taxes
Franchise and business-income taxes
The gift tax
Minimum-wage laws
Social Security (We support an immediate and orderly transition to a system of private pensions)
The Environmental Protection Agency
The Department of Education and all its functions
Unelected bureaucrats
Any and all federal agencies not based on an enumerated power granted by the United States Federal Constitution
Congressional pensions
Supreme Court jurisdiction in cases involving abortion, religious freedom, and the Bill of Rights
The Federal Reserve
Foreign aid, except in cases of national defense or catastrophic disasters, with Congressional approval
Obamacare (but you knew that already)
Things that the Texas Republicans support:
Withdrawal from the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and the World Bank
Traditional methods of discipline, including corporal punishment
Reducing taxpayer funding to all levels of education institutions.
Returning to the time-tested precious metal standard for the United States dollar.
The Texas Republican take on Israel:
Our policy is inspired by Gods biblical promise to bless those who bless Israel and curse those who curse Israel and we further invite other nations and organizations to enjoy the benefits of that promise.
On climate change:
While we all strive to be good stewards of the earth, climate change is a political agenda which attempts to control every aspect of our lives. We urge government at all levels to ignore any plea for money to fund global climate change or climate justice initiatives.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2014/07/texas-republican-new-party-platform.html
If you want better people in government, then don't pretend there's no significant difference between the two parties. Shout out that the Republicans are fucking insane, and a danger to the entire world. And support the politicians who shout that too.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
With Citizens United - It Is Clear - Both Parties Are Owned By The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks
cantbeserious
Jul 2014
#1
Not different enough so that we should not criticize the Dems and pull them back to the left.
cui bono
Jul 2014
#5
Again, said what? Called criticizers names? I'm sure you've seen plenty of that.
cui bono
Jul 2014
#72
I am a progressive and as you see from my signature banner, a strong supporter of Elizabeth
JDPriestly
Jul 2014
#74
If you're willing to use the ACA figures from Avik Roy, Romney's healthcare advisor
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2014
#90
The difference between "some small, some 16.6% increases" and "will double" is huge
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2014
#104
Thank you. It seems the vogue here at DU to jump on the bandwagon condemning Obama.
olegramps
Jul 2014
#91
I htink it's more that many here know that the Dem party is center and that there is a real left
cui bono
Jul 2014
#114
What does "Citizens United" have to do with Democrats owned by "Oligarchs", Corps and Banks?????
George II
Jul 2014
#43
One Source For Unlimited Campaign Financing - Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks
cantbeserious
Jul 2014
#50
Gotta admit a big difference: FDR & JFK didn't need a Billion+ dollars to campaign for President.
Amonester
Jul 2014
#63
PBO has a long history of being elected by the left and then kissing the RW's A$$. When you
Vincardog
Jul 2014
#4
The "teaparty" is a manufactured group. What we can do is Work for and elect REAL Progressives
Vincardog
Jul 2014
#10
That is probably because he is not far enough to the left. The voters can't tell he is any different
Vincardog
Jul 2014
#22
I suppose with our gun- and religious fanatics he may be the best to hope for. Sad.
sadoldgirl
Jul 2014
#27
There are a lot of things they could do, but they require work and time. Such as...
stevenleser
Jul 2014
#66
I've been an officer of my local Democratic committee for more than ten years
George II
Jul 2014
#84
Good post, thank you. Many are wondering what has happened to DU so you're not alone.
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#33
The "Democratic Underground" often seems to be at odds with the party that bears the name.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2014
#42
One of the things President Obama has tried his hardest to get accomplished is the TPP
Enthusiast
Jul 2014
#83
I agree with your frustration. I think he had to do deals with the Devil, so to speak, to become
Dustlawyer
Jul 2014
#46
Every Democrat felt like part of the underground during the Bush administration.
pnwmom
Jul 2014
#48
If you think it's bad here ...try Discussionist. You can't even speak the truth there.
L0oniX
Jul 2014
#98
Yes open and honest criticism is the right way to get us where we need to go.
airplaneman
Jul 2014
#67
I am also dismayed by the name calling and how easy it seems for people to post garbled non-logic.
WCLinolVir
Jul 2014
#86
A Democrat (big D) is the old guy sitting on a park bench and feeding pigeons.
valerief
Jul 2014
#88
I really think there's no question that you can voice whatever viewpoint you have, we all can...and
DesertDiamond
Jul 2014
#105
underground, another word co-opted by entitled, courageless, gen-x hipsters
whereisjustice
Jul 2014
#106
Many of the critics come from third way, corporate think tanks. Ignore them, they will fail.
grahamhgreen
Jul 2014
#111