Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

usrname

(398 posts)
9. The graph and interpretation is misleading
Tue Apr 10, 2012, 12:35 PM
Apr 2012

Cost to put up cell towers has dropped as manufacturing and operations costs have dropped, so it's not so hard to put up a cell tower as before. The towers are now smaller and easier to erect. Also, there's less demand for towers are many places are already well saturated with towers. I mean, eventually, there should be no need to add any more towers, and perhaps just maintenance of existing towers would be enough. Also, revenue has gone up exponentially, so the percentage cost allocated to capital expenditures shouldn't stay at the same rate. Capital expenditures should always decrease over time, as a percentage of revenue. Otherwise, you have capital expenditures as a variable cost growing comparably to the rise in revenue. That would be a bad business model. Cell phone companies don't even make their phones, so even the manufacture of phones, which is a variable cost, is not included as a capital expenditure.

The graph is correct, but the interpretation is completely wrong and misleading.

You are defending Lightsquared? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #1
I understand the frequency tech, please link the forum...regards uponit7771 Apr 2012 #12
not to derail your whole article... but lightsquared failed of their own accord belcffub Apr 2012 #2
Unnnnn, LS has a point..the weak signal isn't their fault and GPS companies had ample time (as.. uponit7771 Apr 2012 #13
sure... but to call this political... belcffub Apr 2012 #14
It is their fault since they are trying to convert frequency from space use to ground use ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #19
It's not unlike health care. We pay more for less. mojowork_n Apr 2012 #3
uh oh youre taking a swipe the sacred cow called cell phone. this will not go over well leftyohiolib Apr 2012 #4
The phones are useful, convenient and sometimes even fun to use. mojowork_n Apr 2012 #5
add to that the profit margin is so high that users are gouged leftyohiolib Apr 2012 #10
The " interference" is with cheap defective GPS units ONLY. Why should Lightsquared pay to fix them? saras Apr 2012 #6
The real issue is the attempt to reclassify the band from low power space based signals to ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #15
Interference accord99 Apr 2012 #17
This is the American business model. It was once called monopolistic and was unlawful. Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #7
Pretty good description of Lightsquared ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #16
fascist marshall gaines Apr 2012 #8
The graph and interpretation is misleading usrname Apr 2012 #9
I think your response is misleading. mojowork_n Apr 2012 #11
i hate my cell phone facultyandstaffshow Apr 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Corruption Responsible fo...»Reply #9