Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
247. What don't you find credible aobut Greenwald/Snowden?
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 08:35 PM
Oct 2014

Snowden produced court orders and other documents proving how extreme the NSA surveillance is and that it encroaches and nearly obliterates a number of our rights.

Greenwald reported on Snowden's documents.

Have you read Greenwald's book, No Place to Hide?

Nance I respect you as a writer, but I don't know much about your background in law and human rights. A good starting place is to read Greenwald's book and also the ACLU website on the NSA surveillance.

Again, what don't you find credible about Greenwald/Snowden?

What do you mean. I'm asking respectfully and I look forward to your response. Thanks.

I am glad you brought this up, I don't have a problem sleeping at night since I am not guilty Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #1
Excellent, you speak for me!1 Thanks!1 n/t UTUSN Oct 2014 #11
To properly evaluate Ed Snowden QuestionAlways Oct 2014 #79
As I replied the same in the other thread, & I respect your opinion without name-calling. n/t UTUSN Oct 2014 #82
I believe all the kvetching from Snowden and Waldo LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #83
I've been here the entire time. I do not want to live in Soviet Russia or NAZI Germany. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #199
I'm not too fond of surveillance either, neither government nor corporate surveillance. LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #207
You lost me LiberalLovinLug Oct 2014 #216
Wonderful post! markpkessinger Oct 2014 #276
Well said. woo me with science Oct 2014 #306
Well put... MrMickeysMom Oct 2014 #307
I'd be fine with them, as we did in fact survive that period treestar Oct 2014 #115
It was far far worse under Bush ConservativeDemocrat Oct 2014 #144
The NSA is violating our constitutional rights. Read my posts on this thread. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #202
How on earth do you imagine that signal intelligence violates anyone's right to free association? ConservativeDemocrat Oct 2014 #279
"information which should only e shared with those authorized to receive the information?" JDPriestly Oct 2014 #23
Could you quote the Constitution where everything is to be shared? Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #35
I am awaiting a response to your reply, but there will be none. LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #81
Please see my post 186. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #190
The government has no right to privacy. Citizens do. The fourth estate bears the burden of Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #106
No, ti doesn't but we let it keep secrets to save us form the Soviets, etc. treestar Oct 2014 #118
"save us form the Soviets"... Thor_MN Oct 2014 #153
If these programs only collected information that was vital to our national security, JDPriestly Oct 2014 #206
So the givernment doesn't have a right to privacy, that being said we will publish Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #122
medical records as well, and if there are any criminal records, that should be made public as well. LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #194
My social securitty number has nothing to do with a theoretical right of prvacy of the JDPriestly Oct 2014 #196
I was replying to post #106 who claims the government does not have a right to privacy. Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #197
Again. Your SS# and income tax returns are not private to protect the right to privacy of the JDPriestly Oct 2014 #245
Again my reply was to someone who thinks everything in the "government" should be available Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #250
That was a good point, and I notice you will not get an honest response treestar Oct 2014 #260
It's NOT a "good point", it's an utterly moronic point! scarletwoman Oct 2014 #285
So from your second paragraph, we have the right to know treestar Oct 2014 #293
+100000 woo me with science Oct 2014 #205
Umm... the Constitution explicitly grants Congress a right to secrecy in its procedings Recursion Oct 2014 #152
That is not a right as in, you know. Bill of Rights. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #154
Why not? Recursion Oct 2014 #166
Okay.....what the fuck? Are you honestly...honestly.....claiming that rights msanthrope Oct 2014 #251
"iats proceedings." Not our proceedings. The Bill of Rights limits the government's ability JDPriestly Oct 2014 #198
Sure it does Recursion Oct 2014 #253
and Section 9 marym625 Oct 2014 #200
Wait... that's two different things Recursion Oct 2014 #255
That the census information is sealed backs up my claim that we have a right to privacy. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #186
Since Bush publically reported the phone data was being collected from providers some time back Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #192
The Constitution prohibits the government from invading our privacy in this way.; JDPriestly Oct 2014 #244
Article 1 Section 9 marym625 Oct 2014 #226
Thank you. polichick Oct 2014 #177
Cool. Then privacy does not matter to you. Give e your passwords. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #99
Since you may want to know everything the government has, let's publish Social Security Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #164
They are a result of private enterprise treestar Oct 2014 #297
Cuz the US government illegally spying on us AgingAmerican Oct 2014 #111
I wonder how a person who is an American, known to be a stealer of classified information treestar Oct 2014 #114
LOL, wow, a NSA fan! nt Logical Oct 2014 #133
My position exactly..... George II Oct 2014 #162
They would never be heard from again.... daleanime Oct 2014 #163
Daniel Ellsberg is still alive and kicking! George II Oct 2014 #165
If he did that today..... daleanime Oct 2014 #189
Manning is the dupe in this whole escapade.... George II Oct 2014 #191
The dupe is us..... daleanime Oct 2014 #193
I am not surprised that you sleep good at night believing that the powerful NSA/CIA Security rhett o rick Oct 2014 #168
If the surveillance in and of itself is not enough, please note this: JDPriestly Oct 2014 #188
Thank you 20score! Bigmack Oct 2014 #2
You're very welcome! 20score Oct 2014 #4
Oh hell yes! K&R! suede1 Oct 2014 #3
Ah, the return of the "authoritarian" name calling at those who dare to differ. UTUSN Oct 2014 #5
au·thor·i·tar·i·an 20score Oct 2014 #8
This particular chariot race has ruts so deep it is unusable. And I predict UTUSN Oct 2014 #12
And you are ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #24
You got in a paragraph Nance sheshe2 Oct 2014 #33
maybe b/c we have mirrors and don't see it? juxtaposed Oct 2014 #72
Then ya got your eyes closed. Cha Oct 2014 #116
i'm sorry, but no I do not... juxtaposed Oct 2014 #125
I am adherent to reality. I have never discredited actual debate. 20score Oct 2014 #34
Funny how sheshe drew a straight line between Snowden critics and Obama supporters GoneFishin Oct 2014 #46
I made no "assumptions". NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #66
This is what you said, you even used the words, "Your assumption." 20score Oct 2014 #68
There is no debate on the credibility LiberalLovinLug Oct 2014 #220
There has never been a debate as to the authenticity of the stolen documents. NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #229
You cannot be that naive Nance LiberalLovinLug Oct 2014 #236
"complete acceptance of everything both men have said and done" druidity33 Oct 2014 #92
What they have "brought to light" ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #140
That's actually bullshit Nance and you know it. druidity33 Oct 2014 #150
One subtle difference about your assertion hootinholler Oct 2014 #151
What I find interesting from those that support the Security State is the justification rhett o rick Oct 2014 #167
Unbelievable that they still trot out the "already known" bullshit LondonReign2 Oct 2014 #176
Where has anyone said ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #210
You actually equate someone stealing a million $ to whistleblowing information? LiberalLovinLug Oct 2014 #218
Jesus Hussein Christ. NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #234
Yes I got the gist first time LiberalLovinLug Oct 2014 #239
Can you point out where I said ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #241
I did admit I was portraying the "gist" of what I gleaned from your reponses. LiberalLovinLug Oct 2014 #248
I thank you for the kind words ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #256
I respect your opinion LiberalLovinLug Oct 2014 #283
Thank you for your reply. NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #290
the actual fact that many people, if not most people hfojvt Oct 2014 #195
Great for foreign countries, too treestar Oct 2014 #294
I don't particularly give a fuck about Snowden or Greenwald Scootaloo Oct 2014 #124
I think you're thinking of ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #138
Nope, I'm not Scootaloo Oct 2014 #139
Hmmm ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #141
Wow-- a "I know you are but what am I" argument? LondonReign2 Oct 2014 #179
Actually, it's more of a ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #215
Yeah? Well you seem to forget that Snowden still works as a hairdresser. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #156
scootalo? grasswire Oct 2014 #267
Oh, it's got all sorts of stuff in there Scootaloo Oct 2014 #268
What is irrational is the claim the US has no right to national security treestar Oct 2014 #296
Everyone is suppose to suck up whatever version G-S comes up with.. just like they do.. OR.. Cha Oct 2014 #128
a weaker state? i was taught the Constitution is what made us strong. nashville_brook Oct 2014 #160
What don't you find credible aobut Greenwald/Snowden? JDPriestly Oct 2014 #247
You don't have to point out that ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #264
My view is that the constitutional violations about which Snowden provided the evidence JDPriestly Oct 2014 #265
There is no point in trying to reach ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #266
If you read the book, you will understand. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #269
Sorry for sayin' so ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #278
Laura Poitras explains how Snowden contacted her and how Greenwald got involved in the JDPriestly Oct 2014 #277
The movie changed Harvey Weinstein's mind. He no longer thinks that Snowden is a Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #281
Wow! JDPriestly Oct 2014 #282
Just got home from seeing the movie. It is a perfect compliment to the book. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #289
Excellent! woo me with science Oct 2014 #316
Curious… I guess your evidence of… MrMickeysMom Oct 2014 #308
It's evidence easily discerned. NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #310
So, it's a correlation, then MrMickeysMom Oct 2014 #313
anarchist aye? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #52
+100000 Of course you are correct that the word, "authoritarian" is accurate here, woo me with science Oct 2014 #126
I have a some favorite posters on DU. Manny, Willy T, Duppers, Suich, Will Pit to name a few. 20score Oct 2014 #129
That is a wonderful, excellent post! scarletwoman Oct 2014 #137
+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #158
Oh woo marym625 Oct 2014 #169
+ infinity. Outstanding post! CrawlingChaos Oct 2014 #225
Nailed it! L0oniX Oct 2014 #243
If the shoe fits... 99Forever Oct 2014 #9
Nyet, nao, it don't fit. Will go elsewhere for more range in sizes. Thanks!1 n/t UTUSN Oct 2014 #14
That sounds dead on from what I've seen of some of the greenwald fans.. Can't debate his fuckups so Cha Oct 2014 #25
The "GG = homophobic" thing was just a hateful smear. joshcryer Oct 2014 #32
Does the same apply to JFK, LBJ, GWB, EW, HRC, FDR, MLK, and so on. Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #42
People pointed that out. joshcryer Oct 2014 #49
I guess whomever named him shpuld be crying crocodile tears of shame. Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #53
Why should we debate Greenwald's "fuck ups" zeemike Oct 2014 #56
^^this. nashville_brook Oct 2014 #171
Do you like the fact that the government is collecting personal information from people's e-mail JDPriestly Oct 2014 #27
i like the fact that Snowden collected data and decided tp share this with the world. Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #48
Since you civilly asked me to explain, I will. UTUSN Oct 2014 #75
What is your legal training? Have you ever studied constitutional law? JDPriestly Oct 2014 #89
I answered sincerely and completely-FOR-ME. I don't need lectures-sermons-patronizing UTUSN Oct 2014 #93
Will you go see the movie? riderinthestorm Oct 2014 #105
I don't see why you're injecting yourself tangentally. I don't have reason to believe that UTUSN Oct 2014 #108
Do your thing and I will do mine. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #112
My quoting a pop-poster from the '70s was not about "therapy" it was about your and my UTUSN Oct 2014 #113
Because they are not treestar Oct 2014 #119
Self-aggrandizement is the biggest thing you're worried about? Hissyspit Oct 2014 #232
I have a giant teddy bear shenmue Oct 2014 #6
Usually on my left side. MineralMan Oct 2014 #7
Do you think that the authors of the Fourth Amendment would sleep well at nightt if they JDPriestly Oct 2014 #30
If it was true the NSA did not acquire the information without a warrant they just may Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #51
Have you read the Fourth Amendment? JDPriestly Oct 2014 #123
Why would you think I have not read the Fourth Amendment? I know about the warrants Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #135
Er, ah, probable cause? RufusTFirefly Oct 2014 #183
Wow, have you been missing the news reports for about the last 15 years? Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #185
Good you've read the Fourth Amendment. A pity that you don't understand it. RufusTFirefly Oct 2014 #187
Probable cause is individual not a holistic rationale. You are making a mockery of the whole concept TheKentuckian Oct 2014 #208
Where did you determine what is individual and holistic rationale? Did not see that in Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #209
I suppose I struggle with your definition of probable cause to such an extent TheKentuckian Oct 2014 #212
Here you go: Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #214
There still is none by what I consider to be a twisted interpretation in the first place. TheKentuckian Oct 2014 #231
Perhaps it is not the crimes committed by the provider, many times Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #235
What opposition to obtaining warrants do you think I expressed? TheKentuckian Oct 2014 #246
they are all dead so I am pretty sure sleep is a non-issue for them... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #55
They would be fine with it as treestar Oct 2014 #298
The Supreme Court did not ok this massive spying on the American people. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #302
Good question. I have asked this, too. woo me with science Oct 2014 #10
+1 newfie11 Oct 2014 #13
How do you like their reaction to the new Iphone? L0oniX Oct 2014 #85
I'm glad you put words to how I feel about iphones. ozone_man Oct 2014 #240
This message was self-deleted by its author woo me with science Oct 2014 #252
+10000000 woo me with science Oct 2014 #254
Good dog whistle! Rex Oct 2014 #15
what has taken me so long to put you on the ignore list? reddread Oct 2014 #44
LOL! Rex Oct 2014 #100
It does encourage others to ignore you as well. Maedhros Nov 2014 #327
You?! DeSwiss Oct 2014 #149
Confused that one is, yes. Rex Oct 2014 #280
You would have to ask Snowden or Greenwald whistler162 Oct 2014 #16
I'm sure they sleep well knowing they are protecting our constiutional rights. JDPriestly Oct 2014 #28
Post removed Post removed Oct 2014 #17
dang -- glad i've been missing some of this. nashville_brook Oct 2014 #175
I don't believe in personality cults. joshcryer Oct 2014 #18
Ironic, given your sig line. RufusTFirefly Oct 2014 #22
Yeah, not sure I am worshiping Huey Long there. joshcryer Oct 2014 #29
Ironic in that authoritarians thrive on personality cults. baldguy Oct 2014 #38
It's why you can be a "whistleblower in Russia." joshcryer Oct 2014 #45
Authoritarians also only view the world in black & white. No shades of grey. baldguy Oct 2014 #58
My country, right or wrong, Dude! RufusTFirefly Oct 2014 #19
My mother ...drunk or sober. L0oniX Oct 2014 #76
Complete agreement from this corner! nt GliderGuider Oct 2014 #20
K & R Thespian2 Oct 2014 #21
I've noted that most people -- I'd like to think I'm excluded but cannot say so absolutely -- come KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #121
Thoughtful and accurate Thespian2 Oct 2014 #132
"Operation Shocking and Awful"... SidDithers Oct 2014 #249
Lately, I'm reading The Stone Diaries and some Alan Moore Swamp Thing comics. randome Oct 2014 #26
... SidDithers Oct 2014 #31
It doesn't bother you in the least that Bush's creation ISIS is using Snowden's leaks baldguy Oct 2014 #36
Nah they don't care... Historic NY Oct 2014 #39
Prove it. 20score Oct 2014 #41
ISIS teaches how to avoid NSA snooping in a Tweet baldguy Oct 2014 #54
Snowden and Greenwald, freakin traitors. LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #88
Snowey gave away the secrets... Historic NY Oct 2014 #258
It's actually funny to see someone pooh-pooh the authoritarian label, then Marr Oct 2014 #65
No worse than having worshipful posts praising Greenwald & Snowden demanding 100% agreement baldguy Oct 2014 #78
Yeah, that would be equally mock-worthy. Marr Oct 2014 #86
Apparently, you didn't read the OP baldguy Oct 2014 #87
Look who's talking about people not reading posts. Marr Oct 2014 #127
Pretty much sums up how I feel about it. zeemike Oct 2014 #37
AMEN!!!!!! Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 #40
Rumor control has it,,,, Cryptoad Oct 2014 #43
Yep... They'd Sell Us Out For 30 Pieces Of Silver WillyT Oct 2014 #47
How much did Greenwald earn from his books exposing US national secrets? baldguy Oct 2014 #64
Whatever works. The goal is to keep the focus on the personalities... RufusTFirefly Oct 2014 #50
DU'ers throwing around the insult "authoritarians" are the most likely to insist on 100% groupthink KittyWampus Oct 2014 #57
This bs has been address several times in this thread. 20score Oct 2014 #63
You want me to prove a negative? LOLZ. KittyWampus Oct 2014 #77
How about disprove a positive. 20score Oct 2014 #80
there's a certain bullying nature about it treestar Oct 2014 #120
Right on cue. woo me with science Oct 2014 #130
mass surveillance stonecutter357 Oct 2014 #184
And here you are behaving this way, right on cue as well. woo me with science Oct 2014 #201
the US spies and stuff. stonecutter357 Oct 2014 #270
I don't know how people like jazzimov Oct 2014 #59
their attacks are usually baseless or vacuous stupidicus Oct 2014 #60
You really nail it with this one sentence. : "They establish their guilt of this simply by GoneFishin Oct 2014 #70
thanks stupidicus Oct 2014 #242
hell to the yeah. nashville_brook Oct 2014 #61
i care about 'the story' iamthebandfanman Oct 2014 #62
No, I don't remember Snowden showing us his smashed laptop. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2014 #172
You are completely correct. The wrongs that they exposed outweigh any transgressions GoneFishin Oct 2014 #67
Big Recommend ! Duppers Oct 2014 #69
Duppers! I've missed you! 20score Oct 2014 #71
Missed you too, my friend! Duppers Oct 2014 #98
K&R!! marym625 Oct 2014 #73
Some people can rationalize anything. pa28 Oct 2014 #74
Greenwald was full of praises for the Bush regime. baldguy Oct 2014 #84
I've been reading Greenward for almost a decade, and that's just not true. Completely wrong! 20score Oct 2014 #91
If you're tired of seeing BS, stop posting it. baldguy Oct 2014 #95
Try a little harder to come up with something the neighborhood six year could old to come up with. 20score Oct 2014 #96
Got it. No rationalizing going on here. pa28 Oct 2014 #94
See post #91 for rationalizing. baldguy Oct 2014 #97
So you're saying Snowden and Greenwald are racist, too? elias49 Oct 2014 #101
No. Only happens that they didn't start screaming until the Pres got a little darker. baldguy Oct 2014 #102
So, "Yes". elias49 Oct 2014 #103
And you're fucking wrong. Prove it. I can link to dozens of articles proving you wrong. 20score Oct 2014 #104
2006 book: How Would a Patriot Act? Defending American Values from a President Run Amok 20score Oct 2014 #107
Pat Tillman joined the army to fight Bush's wars. He criticized it from the inside. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #110
Smearmaster Glenn Greenwald's smear campaign against George W. Bush Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 #134
That's what he was saying in 2008, with Obama on his way to the WH. baldguy Oct 2014 #145
oh sure, he defended Bush in the beginnng - just like the entire Democratic Party leadership Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 #146
Can't change the fact that both Greenwald & Snowden supported Bush and his wars. baldguy Oct 2014 #238
Just like John Kerry and Hillary Clinton -except he admitted he was wrong -They have not to this day Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 #271
But, of course we're not talking about Kerry and Clinton. baldguy Oct 2014 #272
I don't hate them and the Democrats - stop your idiotic nonsense - Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 #273
If you're advocating against the Democratic Party & the sitting Democratic President baldguy Oct 2014 #274
I didn't realize that supporting the Democratic Party required brain-dead robotic thinking Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 #275
No, you seem to think "supporting the Democratic Party" consists entirely of baldguy Oct 2014 #284
you're the one promoting right-wing talking points- you just don't have a clue how us liberals think Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 #288
I'm the one supporting the sitting Democratic President of the United States. baldguy Oct 2014 #292
I'm supporting the sitting President of the United States too - that doesn't mean I have to endorse Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 #295
Ya, right. Thou doth protest too much, methinks. baldguy Oct 2014 #299
that's what you personality cultist don't understand. Loyalty to our country and our democratic way Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 #300
"... the personality cultist make **US** look just as stupid and ignorant and any of the wingnuts." baldguy Oct 2014 #301
Yeah, yeah, yeah. We've all read that. But how convenient Hissyspit Oct 2014 #233
Greenwald & Snowden are the ones who are completely dishonest. baldguy Oct 2014 #237
It's very easy to understand. Puzzledtraveller Oct 2014 #90
I'm personally a bad sleeper -- Lots of restless, mentally anguished nights Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #109
With their head in the sand? RobertEarl Oct 2014 #117
I put those posters on ignore, Maedhros Oct 2014 #131
They start by staring at kitty cat pictures! Corruption Inc Oct 2014 #136
"Then, they talk about how everything is 'the white man's' fault." Jeff Rosenzweig Oct 2014 #143
Soundly. Ykcutnek Oct 2014 #142
the us spies and stuff. stonecutter357 Oct 2014 #147
Ignorance or lack of a conscience helps. DeSwiss Oct 2014 #148
Same here. nt Duppers Oct 2014 #180
when people claim they have nothing to lose, what they really mean is they have nothing whereisjustice Oct 2014 #155
+100000000 nashville_brook Oct 2014 #170
nailed it...nt G_j Oct 2014 #174
+100000 woo me with science Oct 2014 #204
AMEN! Mister Nightowl Oct 2014 #157
Well said Helen Borg Oct 2014 #159
A whole fucking thread of Chris Crocker... SidDithers Oct 2014 #161
I was tempted to start a "SnowWald skeptics post your sleeping strategies here" thread BeyondGeography Oct 2014 #203
And the same folks that are always super quiet when there is (relative) unity here Number23 Oct 2014 #230
Yup. Must be getting close to election time... SidDithers Oct 2014 #257
Authoritarian* followers sleep good at night. rhett o rick Oct 2014 #173
True. Their leaders are honest. Their priests don't rape children... polichick Oct 2014 #178
You got it. Sadly they must not be completely convinced because they have to rhett o rick Oct 2014 #181
Most of them defended torture and slept well at night. JoeyT Oct 2014 #182
Authoritarianism is not bound by party ID. nt OnyxCollie Oct 2014 #211
The good news is that those who attack messengers, when they perceive the sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #213
Thanks Sabrina! Well said! Complete cognitive dissonance on their part. And they anger 20score Oct 2014 #217
They are enablers, and at this point, I have nothing but contempt for anyone who sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #219
Proud to call you my new DU friend! 20score Oct 2014 #224
+1 NealK Oct 2014 #222
It pains me to see people who call themselves Democrats making the same 20score Oct 2014 #221
Interesting. Andy823 Oct 2014 #227
Yes. 20score Oct 2014 #228
No it is not treestar Oct 2014 #261
Those who build surveillance machines woo me with science Oct 2014 #223
^^^THIS^^^ L0oniX Oct 2014 #259
Excellent post and every link is worth studying. JEB Oct 2014 #262
It is never a mistake to click on one of your posts. Thanks Karmadillo Oct 2014 #312
I would like to recommend this Mira Oct 2014 #263
You rock! 20score Oct 2014 #287
Kick for another sour grapes meta blowout. ucrdem Oct 2014 #286
Meanwhile, back at the farm, the Hardy Boys have discovered the murderer's bandana!!! Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #291
The Hardy Boys and the Trail of Tears ucrdem Oct 2014 #311
"How do they sleep at night?" R.Quinn Oct 2014 #303
In case you're still wondering, I've been sleeping much better the past few nights Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #304
Kick for conscience. woo me with science Oct 2014 #305
this thread was an eye-opener... K&R,nt. druidity33 Oct 2014 #309
I agree. Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #314
Still sleeping fine...Any other questions? Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #315
You might ask how Greenwald sleeps at night on his bed of $100 bills Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #317
Daily update: Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #318
Not that you would understand. But thanks for the kick. 20score Oct 2014 #319
You asked me a question, and I answered... Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #320
Greenwald is not the story. Until those who are willfully ignorant 20score Oct 2014 #321
Put me on ignore then, tough guy Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #322
Must have touched a nerve. 20score Oct 2014 #323
I slept pretty well last night Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #325
Slept like the dead over this weekend... Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #324
I know it's not right, and I feel bad about it, but at this point your 20score Nov 2014 #329
To be specific, it's more of a bipolar-passive/aggressive thing Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #330
Do the attacks on Taibbi from those 'journalists' keep You up at night? LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #326
Kick! woo me with science Nov 2014 #328
Maybe you need to ask how the fuck your boy Rand Paul sleeps at night? Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #331
Glenn Greenwald just reprinted in full a mostly-positive review of his book on the Intercept Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #332
Even you can't ignore this one, which ended exactly as I predicted Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #333
Meanwhile, the Intercept has fired all of Taibbi's former hires Blue_Tires Dec 2014 #334
You have been harassing me for over a month now. 20score Dec 2014 #335
Why would I ever alert? Blue_Tires Dec 2014 #336
K & R, just for a re-read... mrdmk May 2016 #337
In light of what has happened since, maybe I need to Blue_Tires Aug 2016 #338
Ask me how I'm sleeping now! Blue_Tires Jan 2017 #339
I'm sleeping fine... How are YOU sleeping? Blue_Tires Oct 2017 #340
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Re: Attacks on Snowden, G...»Reply #247