Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tom Rinaldo

(23,016 posts)
6. Technically accurate but misleading artical title
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 08:44 AM
Nov 2014

With Somalia the U.S. first entered in the face of a truly horrific famine that was then gripping that nation to help distribute food aid that was desperately needed. With Kuwait, Bosnia, Kosovo and Libya the U.S. acted in support of Muslim populations with the support of most of the Muslim nations of the world. It is note worthy that in 3 of those 4 cases the outcome has arguably been positive to date. Libya not so much but it is still a moving picture. Somalia is lawless now, but it was lawless then also.

I'm not defending the other military actions or everything we did with the above, just pointing out that there is often a difference when U.S. actions in Muslim nations are viewed as positive by Muslims at the time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. has Invaded and/or B...»Reply #6