Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(89,462 posts)
14. Meh, fouled on a technicality. Welcome to DU, flying-skeleton!
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 12:03 PM
Nov 2014

Glad you're here! Yeah, we get it, though. I totally understand your urgency! Hell, MY problem is too much shouting, and I'm sure every DUer here would agree with that! Sometimes I find I'm using capital letters way too often, but then again, sometimes I just get so desperate to spread a meme or point something out or assist in some way that I just can't help myself. So I think this would also serve as an apology to the rest of our brothers and sisters of DU, who somehow find it in their hearts to put up with me nonetheless, patient forgiving souls that they are. I SHOUT, DAMMIT!!!!! Love me ANYWAY!!!!!


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The problem is that they do not want ot know. The truth is that when we practice trickle down and jwirr Nov 2014 #1
Yup. Perfect example is my older brother he lost his job of almost 20 years at Bi-Lo cstanleytech Nov 2014 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #16
??? pinto Nov 2014 #18
Thats because it wasnt due to the ACA. cstanleytech Nov 2014 #31
The problem is language. They say trickle down is wildly successfull. And it is for them. Thor_MN Nov 2014 #7
Ah, yes. THEM. the ever-present OTHER who takes what should be for ME and MINE, without earning it. Volaris Nov 2014 #33
What you say is true but is a tangent from what I was saying. Thor_MN Nov 2014 #34
she's so brilliant MissMillie Nov 2014 #2
I'd be proud too. ~nt RiverLover Nov 2014 #3
She's saying the things that NEED to be said! calimary Nov 2014 #13
Run Elizabeth Run .... Please flying-skeleton Nov 2014 #4
Would be nice but I dont picture her running until 2020 at the earliest. nt cstanleytech Nov 2014 #6
As V.P. with Sanders in 2016? maddiemom Nov 2014 #20
I doubt she would run with him as I suspect she probably wants to focus on cstanleytech Nov 2014 #30
Awww, that's so... childish. n/t A Simple Game Nov 2014 #8
Meh, fouled on a technicality. Welcome to DU, flying-skeleton! calimary Nov 2014 #14
Warren / Sanders 2016!!!!! Initech Nov 2014 #23
Supply-side economics doesn't work. Demand is what stimulates the economy. Manifestor_of_Light Nov 2014 #9
it never worked, it never will work noiretextatique Nov 2014 #10
I love her. ReRe Nov 2014 #11
Bush lesson: Tax cuts 4 rich+ bank & mortgage deregulation= DOOM! ErikJ Nov 2014 #12
People who did this did it to make us fail spectacularly. lark Nov 2014 #15
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #17
What is this "nearly" of which you speak ? eppur_se_muova Nov 2014 #19
I just LOVE this woman!!! closeupready Nov 2014 #21
Preach it Liz!!!! Initech Nov 2014 #22
What will you bet that at the next GOP Presidential debate, trickle down tax cuts will be front and aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #24
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #25
Reality of what happens when elections are won by GOP, Reagan pushed his Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #26
So what? POE-PurityOfEssence Nov 2014 #28
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast Nov 2014 #27
She's awesome and speaks the truth...but... IkeRepublican Nov 2014 #29
K&R Segami Nov 2014 #32
GREAT turbinetree Nov 2014 #35
Tell it to Obama and the Third Way "Democrats." blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #36
There was no "Nearly" Senator Warren as it clearly has been a disaster. nt cstanleytech Nov 2014 #37
Exactly the trickly stopped humbled_opinion Nov 2014 #38
30 years of failed conservative economics 4dsc Nov 2014 #39
Substitute "totally", in place of "nearly" SoCalDem Nov 2014 #40
Nearly? woo me with science Nov 2014 #41
And yet EW says she was a Republican because they had better ideas about "the markets..." polichick Nov 2014 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Warren Torches GOP On Eco...»Reply #14