Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
110. Clintons pushed the most wasteful of US funded Haiti projects.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 04:53 PM
Feb 2015
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2013/07/clintons-pushed-most-wasteful-of-u-s-funded-haiti-projects/

Clintons Pushed Most Wasteful of U.S.-Funded Haiti Projects

JULY 02, 2013

Roughly half of the $1.14 billion that the U.S. government allocated to help Haiti recover from the 2010 earthquake has gone to wasteful projects with the single largest chunk—$170.3 million—going to a failed port and power plant adventure heavily promoted by Bill Clinton and the State Department under the leadership if his beloved wife.

Can you say scandal? The former president, who has been heavily involved in distributing Haiti earthquake reconstruction funds, pushed hard for the power plant and port for an industrial park in northern Haiti billed as the centerpiece of the United States’ effort to help the ravaged island nation rebuild. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton joined her husband in the effort, making several trips to Haiti to promote the project and encourage foreigners to invest in it.

In fact, Bill and Hillary Clinton led a star-studded delegation last year to inaugurate the industrial park, located about 100 miles from Port-au-Prince, tied to the power plant and port. Hollywood actors, a famous fashion designer and a British business magnate joined the Clintons as did high-ranking Obama administration officials such as then Labor Secretary Hilda Solis.

Hillary delivered a heart-felt speech saying “we have been united behind a single goal – making investments in this country’s people and your infrastructure that help put Haiti finally on the path to broad-based economic growth with a more vibrant private sector and less dependence on foreign assistance. And we believe that our work here in Haiti and here in the north is beginning to show results.”


Not really, according to a federal audit of the $1.14 billion that Congress approved to help Haiti recover from the powerful earthquake that killed more than 200,000 and left over 1 million homeless. The probe was requested by a Florida congresswoman who chairs the House Middle East and North Africa Subcommittee because hundreds of millions have been spent in Haiti with virtually no accountability.

The Clinton-backed power and port venture is the biggest and most expensive failure mentioned in the report. An astounding $170.3 million later, it is years behind schedule, lacks a qualified engineer and has unrealistic timeframes. As a result, planning has been hindered, the report says, and “funding will be insufficient to cover a majority of projected costs.” It will take an additional $117 to $189 million to complete it and it’s unclear whether the Haitian government will be able to find a private sector company willing to finance the remainder of the project.

That means Uncle Sam must come to the rescue or the $170.3 million already wasted on the project will be lost. Either way, U.S. taxpayers get screwed. Besides the scandalous, Clinton-backed power and port experiment, congressional investigators found mismanagement of a crucial housing plan that was supposed to accommodate up to 90,000 Haitians. USAID claims it will only be able to handle 3,200 to 15,900 people at nearly double the original cost of $59 million. That means the cost per house is nearly triple the original estimate, according to the report.

Back to the Clinton prominence in all things Haiti; the United Nations named the former commander-in-chief as a special envoy to the island and his Clinton Foundation has raised $34 million for Haiti since the catastrophic earthquake hit. Additionally, the former president has distributed $54.4 million from the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund, which was launched shortly after the earthquake. The fund closed in December after distributing the last of the money and claims that it has “helped Haitians create a better future through smart, sustainable economic development” though it acknowledges that “much work remains to be done in Haiti.”

Combined with the U.S. government money and other charities that have raised huge sums for Haiti earthquake recovery, the island has received billions to rebuild. Yet three years later, news report after news report reveals that a large number of Haitians still live in deplorable, shanty town tent cities and an ongoing epidemic of cholera has claimed thousands of lives. Makes you wonder if someone is pocketing the money.


I wonder what the quo was that earned them the quid. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #1
The corporate quid is in anticipation of future political quo. Divernan Feb 2015 #2
+1,000 Scuba Feb 2015 #23
Meanwhile on the Skid Rows and in the public schools, the parks, the city halls, the JDPriestly Feb 2015 #79
A. Freaking. Men. closeupready Feb 2015 #89
Or, as Sir Humphrey Appleby said on 'Yes, Minister'... FiveGoodMen Feb 2015 #102
, blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #3
Well, well. HappyMe Feb 2015 #4
Climate Initiative, poverty and AIDS in Africa, disaster relief. Ewwwww! wyldwolf Feb 2015 #5
Godamn those do-gooders!!! And the Gates people, with their damn free vaccines!!! nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #6
Thumbs up DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #7
Looks like we get to guess your point. Since the graft is used for a good cause it's acceptable. rhett o rick Feb 2015 #9
two points: wyldwolf Feb 2015 #10
I hope you don't believe that the $81 million won't influence any of HRC's decisions. rhett o rick Feb 2015 #15
When I have those momentary flashes of pyschic ability wyldwolf Feb 2015 #16
Maybe Sherrod Brown could explain it to you. n/t countryjake Feb 2015 #88
It's strange how the standards change HappyMe Feb 2015 #12
The Turdway and it's tools are here to represent! Phlem Feb 2015 #105
Our local Mafia don give free food to poor families at Christmas nichomachus Feb 2015 #24
Incredibly poor comparison wyldwolf Feb 2015 #33
That money, in part, forces the Haitian people to live on their knees. Luminous Animal Feb 2015 #90
Bill Clinton's shameful Haitian legacy as he facilitates U.S. business expansion Divernan Feb 2015 #108
Thank you, so much for your post. Luminous Animal Feb 2015 #109
Clintons pushed the most wasteful of US funded Haiti projects. Divernan Feb 2015 #110
some folks here see the name Clinton and go crazy without any idea what the still_one Feb 2015 #28
Epstein is by far the biggest fly in the Clinton Foundation's 'charitable' ointment. nt 99th_Monkey Feb 2015 #53
Whether its Legal or Not...Some snips of why this just doesn't look good for her campaign KoKo Feb 2015 #98
The Guardian is not a neutral publication. still_one Feb 2015 #100
They didn't make this up...its from the Released Documents... KoKo Feb 2015 #104
The willful choice to ignore whatever doesn't fit their views is endemic on this site. Beacool Feb 2015 #69
Yeppers, craftin' that Populist Message (TM) for 2016! hatrack Feb 2015 #8
Let's try this message out to see if it's "Populisty" enough, "HSBC loves HRC, so what about you?" rhett o rick Feb 2015 #11
Or this one wyldwolf Feb 2015 #13
I can only speak for myself. I want to stop the rampant graft and corruption in Wash DC. nm rhett o rick Feb 2015 #17
"I can only speak for myself." Exactly wyldwolf Feb 2015 #18
Some folks are so comfortably ensconced they couldn't care less about preventing diseases and such. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #22
Cause you know ALL that money goes to the needy and diseased. Phlem Feb 2015 #35
Can you prove otherwise? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #39
Can you prove it does 100% Phlem Feb 2015 #49
I'm not making the claim. Oops! Seems the burden of proof is on you. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #50
your also not answering the question. Phlem Feb 2015 #52
Actually the question was posted in #39 by me. You're dodging the questions and diverting wyldwolf Feb 2015 #56
I prefer to not talk to lying assholes. Phlem Feb 2015 #62
ok. I'll assume you'll continue speaking to me then. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #65
So as long as the outcome is good, the method is good nichomachus Feb 2015 #25
Not such a good way to think about it. HappyMe Feb 2015 #27
The point is using this as a line of political attack is pointless wyldwolf Feb 2015 #29
Right cause you've NEVER done anything like that. Phlem Feb 2015 #34
Example? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #37
Sure here you go. Phlem Feb 2015 #40
You made two accusations. Your link doesn't prove either. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #43
of course it doesn't Phlem Feb 2015 #45
Then why did you offer it us as 'proof?' wyldwolf Feb 2015 #47
The why did you offer it us as 'proof?' Phlem Feb 2015 #51
You're avoiding another question wyldwolf Feb 2015 #58
And Charity Begins at Home, right? appalachiablue Feb 2015 #94
Sigh. And all the time I thought they loved UBS. Octafish Feb 2015 #14
The have enough love to embrace all the banksters n/t nichomachus Feb 2015 #26
You bet they love UBS, BFFs of the Clintons, Treasury, Fannie Mae & Wall Street since the 90s. appalachiablue Feb 2015 #95
I think the democrats are trying to throw the election betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #19
How is this a scandal? still_one Feb 2015 #30
What scandal? Beacool Feb 2015 #68
Not even surprised. mylye2222 Feb 2015 #20
;) WillyT Feb 2015 #21
Glad you stayed. n/t benz380 Feb 2015 #31
Gotta love the faithful Ostriches in this thread. Phlem Feb 2015 #32
Hmm..maybe a bit like HappyMe Feb 2015 #54
The Clinton foundation. Phlem Feb 2015 #57
Years ago I had a job HappyMe Feb 2015 #61
I hear ya bud. Phlem Feb 2015 #71
That's right, Charity Begins at Home. Though somehow I don't think the USA is in appalachiablue Feb 2015 #93
More: HSBC could yet be prosecuted over tax-dodging scheme, warns Loretta Lynch/Guardian Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2015 #36
Not surprising, not at all. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #38
K&R n/t bobthedrummer Feb 2015 #41
Hillary reminds me of Jane Harmon olddots Feb 2015 #42
For years, the foundation ran in the red with lavish spending. AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #44
when is tax-avoidance acceptable? quadrature Feb 2015 #46
you're not supposed to say that. Phlem Feb 2015 #70
Surprise! Surprise! Demeter Feb 2015 #48
This woman does not have a chance in a national election. Marr Feb 2015 #55
I bet you it will the ignorant public's fault for not voting for her according to some here Phlem Feb 2015 #64
If the past is any indication, yep. Marr Feb 2015 #78
You may be correct, unfortunately. It's a real mess. appalachiablue Feb 2015 #96
I'm not thrilled about Secretary Clinton, but in all fairness, how is this her scandal? ColesCountyDem Feb 2015 #59
It isn't. Some just want it to be. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #66
She's not my first choice, but drive-by smears like this article are deplorable! ColesCountyDem Feb 2015 #77
Have you any knowledge of the third way? Phlem Feb 2015 #80
No, I was completely brain-dead, until yesterday. ColesCountyDem Feb 2015 #81
Ah I see. Phlem Feb 2015 #83
Did you bother to read all of my posts? ColesCountyDem Feb 2015 #87
yes I did. Sorry. Phlem Feb 2015 #92
Thank you! ColesCountyDem Feb 2015 #97
Could also apply to the Third Way. Phlem Feb 2015 #60
. stonecutter357 Feb 2015 #63
Blah, blah, blah, here's the daily "let's bash the Clintons" post. Beacool Feb 2015 #67
Believe What You Must... But There's A Whole Lot More Coming... WillyT Feb 2015 #82
The ones calling Hillary "inevitable" are her opponents. Beacool Feb 2015 #99
"Donors who were clients of HSBC’s Swiss bank donated $81M to the Clinton Foundation, so?" rhett o rick Feb 2015 #91
As long as Hillary wins the primary madville Feb 2015 #72
Isn't it amazing that people refuse to acknowledge that and even double down against it. Phlem Feb 2015 #74
Yep. Phlem Feb 2015 #73
and the TPP will be a unicorn skipping on a rainbow shitting skittles. Phlem Feb 2015 #75
FDR was far wealthier. joshcryer Feb 2015 #76
Seriously, she needs to go away, not take the reins. nt RiverLover Feb 2015 #84
kick for fun wyldwolf Feb 2015 #85
K&R! countryjake Feb 2015 #86
For those who have no idea what the Clinton Foundation is, maybe this will help still_one Feb 2015 #101
Of course. What else are they going to put on the landing page? Phlem Feb 2015 #106
So you are saying it is a front and a lie. You don't need proof though because it has Clinton in still_one Feb 2015 #111
No, I'm saying understand your media and how to read it. Phlem Feb 2015 #112
No fan of HRC. However this is a non-scandal "scandal" emulatorloo Feb 2015 #103
I'll never vote for obnoxiousdrunk Feb 2015 #107
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clinton Foundation Receiv...»Reply #110