Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
4. Small problem with your construct ...
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 04:56 PM
Feb 2015
They can become the party of working Americans and win. Or ... they can appease Wall Street and lose.

Where should the Democrats go now? Losing both houses of Congress frees them to function as an opposition party, not just to the Republicans, but to a political economy that serves fewer and fewer Americans.

Whether they will seize that opportunity remains an open question. To many within the party establishment, the Democrats face a choice between moving to the center to win over white electors who have either stopped voting or strayed into the Republicans’ ranks, or moving left to re-energize the Rising American Electorate, the young and minority voters who powered Barack Obama into the White House.


The "Rising American Electorate, the young and (particularly) minority voters who powered Barack Obama into the White House" largely don't rate "appeasement of wall street" (whatever that means... "re-create broadly shared prosperity&quot ?) ... "arrest the declining economic fortunes of all but the wealthiest 10 percent(?) ... both from the article, ... "income equity&quot ?), as from the DU responses above), as a priority, unless one uses a really broad description of "appeasing wall street."

YOUNG VOTERS
Size: There are 44 million 18-29 year old citizens in the U.S., (10) one-fifth of the electorate. today’s 18-29 year olds are part of the Millennial Generation, the biggest generation since the Baby Boomers.

Issues: According to Rock the Vote polling, young voters’ top issues are jobs and the economy, followed by Iraq, education and the cost of college, and health care. (11)

Voting: In 2004, young voter turnout jumped by nine percentage points – or 4.3 million votes – over 2000 levels. Again in 2006, turnout was up – this time by 1.9 million over 2002 levels. (12) And in the 2008 primaries, 18-29 year olds’ turnout doubled and tripled in nearly ever contest. (13)

Party ID: 47% Democrat, 28% Republican, and 16% Independent. (14)

YOUNG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
Size: there are 6.3 million African-American citizens between the ages of 18 and 29. (U.S. census)

Issues: According to Rock the Vote polling, this group’s top issues are jobs and the economy, Iraq, education and the cost of college, and health care and prescription drugs.

Voting: In 2004, under-25 African-Americans increased their turnout by 11 points and voted at rates as high as the overall age group for the first time in decades. turnout went up again in 2006. (RTV-CIRCLE)

Party ID: 73% Democrat, 6% Republican, and 15% Independent. (RTV poll)

YOUNG LATINOS
Size: There are 5.6 million Latino citizens between 18 and 29 in the U.S. Young Latinos are the largest and fastest-growing racial or ethnic subset of young adults; 50,000 turn 18 each month. (U.S. census)

Issues: According to Rock the Vote polling, young Latinos’ top issues are immigration, jobs and the economy, the environment and global warming, and Iraq.

Voting: In 2004, turnout among 18-29 year old Latinos jumped six percentage points. In other words, 1.1 million more Latinos under 30 voted than had in 2000. (RTV-CIRCLE)

Party ID: 51% Democrat, 21% Republican, and 19% as Independent. (RTV poll)

YOUNG WOMEN
Size: there are 22 million women between the ages of 18 and 29 eligible to vote in the U.S. (U.S. census)

Issues: According to Rock the Vote polling, this group’s top issues are jobs and the economy, followed by health care, education and the cost of college, and Iraq.

Voting: Young women vote at higher rates than their male peers. In fact, in 2004 young women led the overall young voter turnout increase, jumping 10 percentage points over 2000 levels. (RTV-Circle)

Party ID: 55% Democrat, 26% Republican, and 19% Independent. When marital status is considered, the gap in identification decreases. Forty-eight percent of young married women identify as Democrats, 40% as Republicans, and 5% as Independents. (RTV poll)

YOUNG MEN
Size: There are 22 million men between the ages of 18 and 29 eligible to vote in the U.S. (U.S. census)

Issues: According to Rock the Vote polling, young men’s top issues are jobs and the economy, followed by Iraq, health care, gas prices, and immigration.

Voting: Young men’s voter turnout lags behind young women’s, but men have also increased their turnout in the past two elections. In 2004, participation among men under 30 jumped by almost 8 points over 2000 levels; in 2006, their turnout grew by 3 points over 2002 levels. (RTV-CIRCLE)

Party ID: 38% Democrat, 30% Republican, and 22% Independent. (RTV poll)

http://www.completecampaigns.com/article.asp?articleid=116

Republicans have started saying, "income inequality." winter is coming Feb 2015 #1
Heh.. The Repubs are even starting to make noises about ending the drug war Fumesucker Feb 2015 #2
yes. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #3
Wait till we hear it from Hillary when she figures out which way the wind is blowing. L0oniX Feb 2015 #20
Small problem with your construct ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #4
it's the american prospect's construct, not mine. and what i get from your blurb is that *everyone* ND-Dem Feb 2015 #5
Did you miss from my "blurb" ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #6
I doubt anyone in the 99% would prioritize the appeasement of Wall Street (though I doubt ND-Dem Feb 2015 #8
That's my point ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #16
Most of the posters on this board rarely interact with a Latino person... DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #21
So true, with one caveat ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #22
The problem with catchphrases like "the 99%" is that they're not realistic... brooklynite Feb 2015 #24
fyi, "Why Republicans Are Suddenly Talking About Economic Inequality" RiverLover Feb 2015 #9
On the other hand "The rich are getting richer and you are getting poorer" resonates nicely Fumesucker Feb 2015 #10
it's kind of weird; in my experience, two kinds of people do it. one kind is basically uninformed; ND-Dem Feb 2015 #14
That sounds right to me, I see the same thing Fumesucker Feb 2015 #15
I agree and both groups repeat the narrative ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #19
I agree. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #17
Really great article. Tough to hear, but I hope that Dem leaders hear it...for our country's sake. RiverLover Feb 2015 #7
+100. I think the congressional numbers are pretty telling. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #11
I still think that is a nonsense framework hfojvt Feb 2015 #13
DURec leftstreet Feb 2015 #12
K & R L0oniX Feb 2015 #18
Interesting that some DU members don't want the Democratic Party to champion income equality. Scuba Feb 2015 #23
yes, it is. If the democrats don't stand for that, I don't see what they stand for. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #25
They ARE coming out of the woodwork lately, aren't they? Populist_Prole Feb 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Democrats in Oppositi...»Reply #4