Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,127 posts)
39. Could it be, maybe, that cutting back on the government, and then cutting back some more
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 07:53 PM
Mar 2015

on the government, could be at least partly to blame? If we're trying to shrink government down so small we can drown it in a bathtub, then maybe we need to stop doing that so relentlessly? It costs money to get new computers and up-to-date equipment, AND to STAY up-to-date with all the technology that seems to update itself every minute on the minute...

That does take funding. It takes funding for equipment and funding to hire people to do this, run this, install this, troubleshoot this, and patrol this - helping the State Dept people learn it and work with it without fucking up too much, and keep it updated - AS WELL AS the increasingly critical monitoring of it for security purposes and protect it from hackers.

That takes money.

I think when the actual state department employee who posts here explained it, it became obvious stevenleser Mar 2015 #1
Or, if someone had posted ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #6
Amazing how the United States State Department is still Wellstone ruled Mar 2015 #2
LMAO, COBOL, COmmon Business Oriented Language. stevenleser Mar 2015 #3
OOps!!! Wellstone ruled Mar 2015 #23
Hey! Leith Mar 2015 #33
CoBOL and HLASM performs faster and is 1/3 the cost to support and debug. TheBlackAdder Mar 2015 #26
Testify! COBOL and big iron still have a place. riqster Mar 2015 #49
I prefer FORSKIN tridim Mar 2015 #9
Hey! It is Cobol and they are probably running an older version of Fortran!! madinmaryland Mar 2015 #25
Could it be, maybe, that cutting back on the government, and then cutting back some more calimary Mar 2015 #39
+1! riqster Mar 2015 #50
the du helpers are already at it - Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #4
while neglecting ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Mar 2015 #19
I agree, but the panic by some neophyte HRC supporters was funny too. n/t FSogol Mar 2015 #5
What you call 'panic' the real world calls... wyldwolf Mar 2015 #32
No some people presented facts, but some people tried to deflect by blaming FSogol Mar 2015 #37
No one blamed Jeb Bush. See, responses to right wing memes have many facets. wyldwolf Mar 2015 #40
This isn't your Jeb post from this morning? FSogol Mar 2015 #42
Point #1 above: Expose the people pointing fingers who've done the same thing as hypocrites. wyldwolf Mar 2015 #47
Get ready for an endless glut of "Bad Hillary!" stories from... Mike Nelson Mar 2015 #7
and while we're at it... Phentex Mar 2015 #8
Psssst...I understand there's this place called BENGHAZI where she's REALLY vulnerable... brooklynite Mar 2015 #10
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #13
It is so amusing. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #12
Fall apart how? nichomachus Mar 2015 #14
...who also used personal email accounts for business and louis-t Mar 2015 #16
nope i would say it is the Hillary supporters who are having a non stop major meltdown m-lekktor Mar 2015 #15
Im not exactly a Hillary supporter... trumad Mar 2015 #18
the "meltdown" was Warren supporters not being able to handle some mild commentary from Dean KittyWampus Mar 2015 #30
I'm not a Hillary supporter at this point in time.. but, I don't like the pitchfork mode derived Cha Mar 2015 #54
THEY DID EXACTLY WHAT HILLARY DID; BELIEVE A NON CREDIBLE SOURCE ABOUT SOMEONE ... uponit7771 Mar 2015 #17
Oooo. Score! n/t Orsino Mar 2015 #20
There have been H2O Man Mar 2015 #21
Two things are inevitable my friend... trumad Mar 2015 #22
Some of these folks are so full of shit, I'd really hate to be around when those heads explode Number23 Mar 2015 #24
Only the empty heads. I'm not ready for Hillary but I know she isn't stupid. PedXing Mar 2015 #27
She's not my preferred candidate, but these cheap attacks on her are ridiculous! ColesCountyDem Mar 2015 #28
I just checked, and my head didn't explode. Maedhros Mar 2015 #29
My head's intact Android3.14 Mar 2015 #31
LOL! Rex Mar 2015 #34
Meh, at the end of the day though for me I will vote for her over just about any single Republican. cstanleytech Mar 2015 #35
I think she was pretty savvy if she did use a non secure, mass email account Warpy Mar 2015 #36
They should have waited 24 business hours. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #38
I suppose...... DeSwiss Mar 2015 #41
yawn trumad Mar 2015 #48
BENGHAZI!!! PeaceNikki Mar 2015 #43
VINCE FOSTER! DON'T EVER FORGET! Nye Bevan Mar 2015 #45
I'm not a Hillary supporter but thought it all the usual noise from the media machine. mmonk Mar 2015 #44
Lots of similarities between certain DU posts and Breitbart today (nt) Nye Bevan Mar 2015 #46
the media is doing it's job...gin it up boys spanone Mar 2015 #51
Point to ONE POST where heads were exploding!!! nt Logical Mar 2015 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author Sissyk Mar 2015 #53
Locking. META is not allowed in GD... one_voice Mar 2015 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oh my---heads explode at ...»Reply #39