Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The story behind the JFK facepalm picture [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)10. The CIA, the Murder of Lumumba, and the Rise of Mobutu
What Really Happened in Congo
by Stephen R. Weismann
Foreign Policy Aug/Sept 2014
EXCERPT...
Thats when the Eisenhower administration sent in the CIA. In the decades that followed, the dominant narrative in U.S. foreign policy circles portrayed the U.S. covert action in Congo as a surgical, low-cost success. Even the 1975 U.S. Senate investigation by the Church Committee, which was heavily critical of the CIA, concluded that of the five covert paramilitary campaigns it studied, the operation in Congo was the only one that achieved its objectives. Those who hold this view credit the U.S. government with avoiding a direct military confrontation with the Soviet Union and China while foiling the communists attempts to gain influence over a key African country. They acknowledge that the CIA contributed to the fall of Lumumba, who lost a power struggle with Joseph Mobutu, the pro-Western head of Congos army, in September 1960. But they maintain that even though the CIA plotted to assassinate Lumumba -- once even trying to get a recruit to poison his toothpaste or food -- it never did so, and had no hand in his eventual murder, in January 1961. They also recognize the agencys contribution to the military defeat of Lumumbas followers. As for Mobutu, who would go on to become one of Africas most enduring and venal leaders, proponents of the orthodox account argue that his faults became clear only later, many years after CIA involvement had run its course.
SNIP...
The CIA rushed to his side with more money, warnings about assassination plots, and recommendations for ministerial appointments. It counseled Mobutu to reject reconciliation with Lumumba and instead arrest him and his key associates, advice Mobutu readily accepted. Devlin became not just the paymaster but also an influential de facto member of the government he had helped install. His principal vehicle was the so-called Binza Group, a caucus of Mobutus political allies that got its name from the Léopoldville suburb where most of them lived. It included Mobutus security chief and his foreign and finance ministers. In the months after the coup, the group consulted Devlin on major political and military matters, especially those dealing with Lumumba, who was now under house arrest but protected by UN troops.
The group almost always heeded Devlins advice. In October, for example, Mobutu threatened to expand his power by firing President Kasavubu -- which would have deprived the government of its last shred of political legitimacy. So Devlin persuaded him to accept a compromise instead, under which Mobutu would work with a council of associates -- all paid by the CIA -- that would choose cabinet ministers for Kasavubu and control parliament. Devlin also convinced the Binza Group to drop a risky plan to attack Lumumbas UN security detail and arrest Lumumba.
On January 14, 1961, Devlin was informed by a government leader that Lumumba, who had escaped from UN protection and been captured by Mobutus troops, was about to be transferred to the Belgian-backed secessionist province of South Kasai, whose leader had vowed to murder him. In his subsequent, January 17 cable reporting this critical contact to CIA headquarters, Devlin gave no indication that he had voiced any opposition to the plan. Given his intimate working relationship with Congos rulers and his previous successful interventions with them concerning Lumumba, Devlins permissive stance was undoubtedly a major factor in the governments decision to move Lumumba.
But Devlin did more than give a green light to the transfer. He also deliberately kept Washington out of the loop -- an exception for a covert program that was being closely managed by the CIA, the State Department, and the National Security Council. On the same day that he was informed of Lumumbas prospective transfer, Devlin learned that the State Department had denied his and CIA headquarters urgent request for funds to pay off a key Congolese garrison on the verge of a mutiny that threatened to restore Lumumba to power. John F. Kennedy was to take office in six days, and the State Department considered the request one of high policy that should wait for the new administration to decide.
CONTINUED...
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/141523/stephen-r-weissman/what-really-happened-in-congo
Yup.
by Stephen R. Weismann
Foreign Policy Aug/Sept 2014
EXCERPT...
Thats when the Eisenhower administration sent in the CIA. In the decades that followed, the dominant narrative in U.S. foreign policy circles portrayed the U.S. covert action in Congo as a surgical, low-cost success. Even the 1975 U.S. Senate investigation by the Church Committee, which was heavily critical of the CIA, concluded that of the five covert paramilitary campaigns it studied, the operation in Congo was the only one that achieved its objectives. Those who hold this view credit the U.S. government with avoiding a direct military confrontation with the Soviet Union and China while foiling the communists attempts to gain influence over a key African country. They acknowledge that the CIA contributed to the fall of Lumumba, who lost a power struggle with Joseph Mobutu, the pro-Western head of Congos army, in September 1960. But they maintain that even though the CIA plotted to assassinate Lumumba -- once even trying to get a recruit to poison his toothpaste or food -- it never did so, and had no hand in his eventual murder, in January 1961. They also recognize the agencys contribution to the military defeat of Lumumbas followers. As for Mobutu, who would go on to become one of Africas most enduring and venal leaders, proponents of the orthodox account argue that his faults became clear only later, many years after CIA involvement had run its course.
SNIP...
The CIA rushed to his side with more money, warnings about assassination plots, and recommendations for ministerial appointments. It counseled Mobutu to reject reconciliation with Lumumba and instead arrest him and his key associates, advice Mobutu readily accepted. Devlin became not just the paymaster but also an influential de facto member of the government he had helped install. His principal vehicle was the so-called Binza Group, a caucus of Mobutus political allies that got its name from the Léopoldville suburb where most of them lived. It included Mobutus security chief and his foreign and finance ministers. In the months after the coup, the group consulted Devlin on major political and military matters, especially those dealing with Lumumba, who was now under house arrest but protected by UN troops.
The group almost always heeded Devlins advice. In October, for example, Mobutu threatened to expand his power by firing President Kasavubu -- which would have deprived the government of its last shred of political legitimacy. So Devlin persuaded him to accept a compromise instead, under which Mobutu would work with a council of associates -- all paid by the CIA -- that would choose cabinet ministers for Kasavubu and control parliament. Devlin also convinced the Binza Group to drop a risky plan to attack Lumumbas UN security detail and arrest Lumumba.
On January 14, 1961, Devlin was informed by a government leader that Lumumba, who had escaped from UN protection and been captured by Mobutus troops, was about to be transferred to the Belgian-backed secessionist province of South Kasai, whose leader had vowed to murder him. In his subsequent, January 17 cable reporting this critical contact to CIA headquarters, Devlin gave no indication that he had voiced any opposition to the plan. Given his intimate working relationship with Congos rulers and his previous successful interventions with them concerning Lumumba, Devlins permissive stance was undoubtedly a major factor in the governments decision to move Lumumba.
But Devlin did more than give a green light to the transfer. He also deliberately kept Washington out of the loop -- an exception for a covert program that was being closely managed by the CIA, the State Department, and the National Security Council. On the same day that he was informed of Lumumbas prospective transfer, Devlin learned that the State Department had denied his and CIA headquarters urgent request for funds to pay off a key Congolese garrison on the verge of a mutiny that threatened to restore Lumumba to power. John F. Kennedy was to take office in six days, and the State Department considered the request one of high policy that should wait for the new administration to decide.
CONTINUED...
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/141523/stephen-r-weissman/what-really-happened-in-congo
Yup.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He was a force for a brief and intense period of time...lots of kids were named after him.
MADem
Mar 2015
#1
This is very revealing. We think we live in a democracy, then we find out, no we do not.
Enthusiast
Mar 2015
#3
No! According to the neoliberal DU Right Wing, President Maduro of Venezuela must go,
Zorra
Mar 2015
#15
layer after layer of otherwise unknown (to most Americans)actions/effects of U.S. policies
2banon
Mar 2015
#16
Jim DiEugenio has done an amazing amount of serious research and writing on JFK. (as has others)
2banon
Mar 2015
#32
Midnight in the Congo: The Assassination of Lumumba and the Mysterious Death of Dag Hammarskjöld
MinM
Mar 2015
#13
My father had a high position in the African Affairs section of JFK's State Dept...
First Speaker
Mar 2015
#23
G. Mennen Williams former Michigan Governor, New Deal Democrat, helped build the Mackinac Bridge...
Octafish
Mar 2015
#25