Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
10. I disagree. He could believe that.
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 07:23 PM
Apr 2015

The TPP will evidently have dozens of lengthy chapters, covering a host of major subjects (going well beyond tariff reduction). It would be pretty hard to do a deal of that complexity that didn't have at least some good and at least some bad. It's a question of weighing the two sides. Here, he sees the benefits as outweighing the costs.

I also don't think he's deliberately selling bad policies because he's getting paid to do so. If he has an ulterior motive, it's more likely to be that he, like all Presidents, wants to have an impact and leave a legacy. "Obama considered a proposal for a bad trade deal and rejected it" doesn't have much oomph. Heck, even Bush the Lesser probably rejected some bad ideas that Cheney or Rumsfeld came up with. "Obama signed a landmark trade deal that reshaped the commerce of 40% of the world's economy for a generation" is much more dramatic. That may well have a subconscious influence on his weighing of the pros and cons.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama’s deal with the dev...»Reply #10