Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
9. ROFL
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 07:44 AM
Apr 2015

Indeed.

They really don't understand that 1) faculty, despite the difficult job market, will not take jobs in places where tenure is not available, or is eliminated at virtual whim, and 2) you need faculty to a) be accredited, and, therefore, b) continue to exist as a university.

These Republican legislatures think university faculty are just like any other kind of employee. They're quite wrong. You give up a good deal of salary and expend the opportunity costs (six years on assistantships rather than salary in industry) to earn a PhD and work in a university. In return, you are left to do your research and teaching in peace with relative job security. That's the trade-off. Without tenure, there would be no incentive to be trained in a field, which is costly and time-consuming. Adjunctification is already reaching a critical point. It's unsustainable as a personnel practice.

It wouldn't matter if the LSU football team was the most profitable team in the nation. If you can't recruit faculty, you don't have a university.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Louisiana State Universit...»Reply #9