Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
14. OWS is based on Ghandi's philosophy and they have adhered to those principles.
Mon May 21, 2012, 04:28 PM
May 2012

Their huge success worldwide so far, leads me to believe they are correct. It's unfortunate however that the police bring violence to every protest. But the majority of people, in polls in NYC eg, over 80% condemned police violence, even when they did not support the movement as it was obvious to them that the protesters were peaceful.

Despite media efforts to conflate police violence with the protesters, the NYT eg, was caught editing reports, one perfect example where the initial headline was correct in reporting police actions, was changed online even as people watched to 'Protesters and Police Clash'. Lol, people understand this kind of propaganda now so it's not as effective as it used to be.

So I would say that they should continue to be peaceful regardless of provocation, which they do emphasize at every GA before the protests.

When protesters have become violent throughout history, it is usually to protect themselves from harm.

So the best way to keep this movement peaceful would be for our elected officials to step in, as requested by the UN Human Rights Rappateur, and instruct their police departments to refrain from the violence that has become so prevalent now. If that were to happen, there would be little chance that this movement, so committed to non-violence, would ever become violent.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Push poll. UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #1
I thought about adding Cesar Chavez, but it's a little nuanced for most. Robb May 2012 #2
Your implication is that OWS is trying to achieve something UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #10
Non-violence usually works. But not always. MannyGoldstein May 2012 #3
LOL. Then they laugh at you, then they fight you, eh? Robb May 2012 #4
Obviously, extreme situations like the rise of Nazi Germany call for violence, but boxman15 May 2012 #5
More Malcolm: KamaAina May 2012 #6
Where's the dingbat option? KamaAina May 2012 #7
Both are equal. Arctic Dave May 2012 #8
The correct approach is always the one that wins 4th law of robotics May 2012 #9
"The correct approach is always the one that wins." UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #12
Ghandi vs. the Nazis: "The Last Article" by Harry Turtledove Johnny Rico May 2012 #20
A good short story 4th law of robotics May 2012 #24
Faulty Premise, Sir The Magistrate May 2012 #11
And there you go Your Honor...... socialist_n_TN May 2012 #25
This is why we vote. Major Hogwash May 2012 #13
OWS is based on Ghandi's philosophy and they have adhered to those principles. sabrina 1 May 2012 #14
The thing they've stressed before every protest UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #15
I think they are not familiar with the movement, that is what I have sabrina 1 May 2012 #18
I was represented by the National Lawyers Guild UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #19
They are real heroes. I am glad you were represented by them. And the fact that they were available sabrina 1 May 2012 #23
. Go Vols May 2012 #16
Shays was a well known anarchist. UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #17
I'll side with Malcolm since his quote doesn't play the "magic bullet" game. TheKentuckian May 2012 #21
they both had their crusades finished off by violence. provis99 May 2012 #22
Yes, but wouldn't it be nice if they hadn't RZM May 2012 #26
All things being equal: non-violent wins RobertEarl May 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll question: Who is mor...»Reply #14