Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's Gotten Harder to Lose Weight- And Not for the Reasons You Think [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)59. No, actually your body does treat the calories the same
In the end, it all gets turned into ATP.
Where simple carbohydrates vs complex carbohydrates/proteins/fats differs is how fast we can burn them. The more complex molecules take much longer to digest, so you feel "full" longer. Simple carbohydrates digest very quickly, so you get a spike of energy, which quickly collapses and you feel hungry again.
Keep in mind, the "war on fats" was started from a study in the 1960s. A nearly identical study in the 1990s has started the "war on carbs". If the first study was so wrong, we should probably be a bit cautious about assuming the second one is correct.
Artificial sweeteners are also to blame. The ones made from sugar alcohols still contain carbohydrates even though they are labelled "zero calories." That means that your body still treats them like simple sugars and burns them before it burns through its fat stores.
Not quite.
First, most artificial sweeteners are not "sugar alcohols". Saccharine and aspartame (NutraSweet) aren't sugar-derived and do not behave as sugar when digested.
Sucralose (Splenda) is a large ring with a several sugar molecules attached. The enzyme we use to break down sugar can't attach to the sugar molecules because of the ring. In the majority of people, that means the Sucralose...leaves out the back door, shall we say. Some bacteria are able to break the ring. If you have those bacteria in your gut, you will get some sugar, and thus calories, from sucralose. Those bacteria is also why some people report "digestive issues" after eating food with sucralose - the bacteria are thriving on the sucralose.
The main way artificial sweeteners can hurt is if you don't consume anything with calories. Let's say you drink a Diet Coke (aspartame). Your body detects the incoming sweet, and says "Hey, we're about to get a bunch of sugar. Go ahead and release some stored sugar into the bloodstream". Then you don't get the sugar, because aspartame isn't sugar. That causes you to feel hungry, as your body seeks to replace the released sugar. If you eat something along with that Diet Coke, you'll have received some sugars and not have this effect.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's Gotten Harder to Lose Weight- And Not for the Reasons You Think [View all]
TygrBright
Oct 2015
OP
So glad you said this - because I needed more people telling me how lazy I am
nadine_mn
Oct 2015
#69
I disagree, never hungry is the low carb! Thus no snacking. And carbs feed sugar issue. Nt
Logical
Oct 2015
#62
Nothing else ever worked including calorie restriction. So ther is more to it....
Logical
Oct 2015
#68
Low carb is calorie restriction. "Counting carbohydrates" is a proxy for counting calories.
jeff47
Oct 2015
#72
"Low carb is calorie restriction." Not necessarily, if you're eating more fats. n/t
eShirl
Oct 2015
#118
Not-carbs that include meat also include all the steroids that are causing ANGER ISSUES
loudsue
Oct 2015
#107
I think it's more complicated, especially when you throw metabolic issues into the mix such as
Ed Suspicious
Oct 2015
#103
Beans! Not the BPA-canned kind, but the kind you cook yourself. Beans with butter. Yum!
valerief
Oct 2015
#125
So have the antibiotics we take from time to time. They use them in animals' feed to fatten them up
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#76
Keep going, Marrah! I can't even walk down the cereal aisle anymore, it smells sugary gross!
Dont call me Shirley
Oct 2015
#80
Obesity rates have seemed to rise in correlation to the increasing amount of crap allowed in our
Mnemosyne
Oct 2015
#3
so you discount all the research referenced in the article? are you okay with the "it's all your
niyad
Oct 2015
#8
in the documentary "designing healthy communities", one of the points made was that the
niyad
Oct 2015
#5
+1.I read that people who live in suburbs are 6-10 lbs. heavier than folks in the city or country.
appalachiablue
Oct 2015
#41
nothing silly about your last statement at all--that is one of the reasons that mall walk groups
niyad
Oct 2015
#93
Thank you. It's hard to live a healthy life, hard to find foods, avoid toxins...
MindfulOne
Oct 2015
#7
Everyone seems to glanced over this phrase:(the explanations are still only hypotheses)
Deadshot
Oct 2015
#12
For the overwhelming majority of people, healthy eating and exercise is enough
mythology
Oct 2015
#13
Lean meats are pretty much just as good. I ate an apple, 4 chicken breasts, 2 buns, 2 pieces of
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#30
everyone has a different metabolism. My husband had a heart attack 4 and half months ago so
liberal_at_heart
Oct 2015
#124
Calories in, calories out is a bunch of propaganda created by the food industry.
Chakab
Oct 2015
#14
I run on diet dr pepper and i was able to lose 1/2 a pound a day for 2 months last year. I also
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#25
I won't say that calories is the only part of the equation. But it's a huge part.
backscatter712
Oct 2015
#17
I have sport horses and agree, the differing metabolism is a huge factor
riderinthestorm
Oct 2015
#51
There's danger in floating conjecture which contradicts "calories in - calories out"
Major Nikon
Oct 2015
#84
It seems as though people are looking for ways to blame everything but themselves
Deadshot
Oct 2015
#65
As a yo-yo dieter all my 59 years, I decided 5 years ago to change my life and my diet because I was
Holly_Hobby
Oct 2015
#50
my mom and i always talk about how in india every once in a while you'll get some GI disease
La Lioness Priyanka
Oct 2015
#57
And, conversely, the antibiotics more readily available here contribute to weight gain.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#75
You've nailed it! Move more, eat less. Enjoy what you do, and when it starts creeping up,
underahedgerow
Oct 2015
#111
Sugar, artificial ingredients, pesticides, gmos, chemicals, lack of living organisms beneficial
Dont call me Shirley
Oct 2015
#79