Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
15. flashback..
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 11:39 AM
Nov 2015
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0101/06/se.02.html

Congressional Black Caucus Protests Electoral Vote Count

Aired January 6, 2001 - 2:00 p.m. ET

KYRA PHILLIPS, CNN ANCHOR: And if you're just joining us, we're going to go straight to the press conference we told you about with the Congressional Black Caucus with regard to the -- all right, we're working on getting audio for you in just a moment. And while we're doing that, I will recap just a bit.

REP. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON (D), TEXAS: ... black caucus, and I'm going to ask Mr. Hastings to give his opening statement, and I'll return.

REP. ALCEE HASTINGS (D), FLORIDA: Thank you very much, Madam Chair.

Today was a very solemn day, and the remarks are that many of us were not permitted, regretted by us all. Had I been given an opportunity to go forward with an appropriate objection, I would have indicated that because of the overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud, and an attempt to suppress voter turnout by unlawful means, I felt the necessity -- as do my colleagues from the Congressional Black Caucus, and other members of the House of Representatives -- to object to the kinds of errors against democracy, the holy grail of democracy, that were permitted in the state of Florida.

And we felt that they should not be tolerated, as they would not be tolerated in other countries. Indeed, we should not tolerate them in America.


I would have said to Vice President Gore that Harry Truman once said that what is popular is not always right, and what is right is not always popular. What we were doing here today is right. I hope all of our colleagues and the American people see it that way. And that is why we raised our objection. And it's a proud moment for the conscience of the House of Representatives, for those of us that are representing the entirety of the Congressional Black Caucus, in the presence of our chairlady, and the members here assembled, we stand proudly to say that we did what was right.

JOHNSON: Forty years ago, during the civil rights movement, I marched for justice with a firm belief that my son would not have to march, in order to utilize his voting rights. Much to my dismay, 40 years later, I find myself marching again, but this time for my grandchildren, so that they will not have to march in order to be afforded the same rights.

How long will we settle for injustice in America? How long will we have to fight to perfect the 15th Amendment? How long will we have to struggle for something that should be every American's birthright? On election day, 100 million Americans went to the polls to make their voices heard. Those voices want to be heard still. No hyper- technical manipulation of election laws should derail the intent of the voter.

We cannot sweep under the carpet the claims of first-time college voters who say they registered to vote, had voter registration cards in their hand, but when they were not allowed to vote at the polls, because their names were not on the roll, the lines were busy all over the country, where they tried to call to clarify their registration.

We cannot sweep this under the carpet, the cries of those who were incorrectly removed from the polling places in Florida by an inept Texas company hired by Mr. Bush's brother.

We cannot ignore believable stories of police intimidation, questionable activities by poll workers and simple ineptness by volunteers at the precincts. We cannot ignore what we saw with our own eyes on television: polls closing on voters in St. Louis, un- American voting lines in Pennsylvania and incredibly complex ballots in South Florida.

There is overwhelming evidence that George W. Bush did not win this election, either by national popular vote or the Florida popular vote. As members of Congress charged with defending the constitutional principles of this country, it is our duty to challenge this vote.
<snip>

REP. CARRIE MEEK (D), FLORIDA: We dare not have it repeated. We dare not have the Tilden and the Rutherford Hayes situation repeated again, because it disenfranchised our people at that time.

This will disenfranchise -- it already has -- our people. We don't want that continued. We will always come out. We will always fight. We don't care who is it there.

We are very disappointed that our senators did not stand up and support us today. We helped to elect those senators. They will hear from us again, because we feel very disappointed that they didn't say we want our African-Americans, and our disjointed people who were not able to vote, to have someone in the halls of Congress to say, yes, give them a chance to debate this issue, so that the world could see what is happening here.

We have had our votes nullified. That's why we're so sad. They were nullified by defective voting machines, nullified by discriminantly distributed and targeted machinery, election machinery, in our neighborhoods. The votes were nullified by a purge of voting lists, undertaken by direction from a campaign that retained the equivalent of electoral thugs.

I was there. I saw exactly what happened. I was chased by these thugs. I was called a communist by these thugs, a socialist by these thugs, many of them who were not even citizens of this country. That's what happened in this campaign in Miami-Dade, Florida.

So that we were illegally struck from the voting list by a process that classified thousands of our people as felons. We were nullified again by deals that were cut in cities -- cut by the winning campaign, with our leading authorities in our cities. We were nullified by ballots that were printed in such a way that reasonably thinking citizens could not know for whom they were voting. That's why we're here.

Everyone should have a right to know how they're voting, and for whom they're voting. We were nullified again, by a secretary of state, who has already been given a very big accomplishment by this administration. She authorized her authority to prevent valid votes from being counted. So, it nullified the thing for us.

All that is left for us now, as the Congressional Black Caucus and as citizens of this country, is to exercise our First Amendment rights, while we still have it, and before it is further undermined by a politically dominated Supreme Court.

We exercise that right today to protest against this ill-chosen nomination. We exercise our right to petition our government for our citizenry to receive a redress of grievances. So, I speak for the majority of Americans, particularly African-American Americans, who did not vote for the new president-elect, but who now must live under an administration that appears to award spoils to the victors, even when the electoral process has been so clearly corrupted.
thank you

----

We're going to bring in our congressional correspondent Chris Black once again.

Definitely not business as usual today, Chris.

CHRIS BLACK, CNN CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Not exactly. Things were going along as expected. The District of Columbia votes were recorded, and then Chaka Fattah, ironically a member of the black caucus himself but one of the two House tellers working on this Electoral College vote today, got to Florida. He announced the 25 Electoral College votes. Al Gore said, is there an objection? And there were a lot of them. A dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus, one after the other, rose to their feet to object to the votes from Florida.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

AL GORE, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: For what purpose does the gentleman from Florida, Mr. Deutsch, arise?

REP. PETER DEUTSCH (D), FLORIDA: To make point of order.

GORE: Gentleman will state his point of order.

DEUTSCH: Mr. President, we have just completed the closest election in American history. There are at least...

GORE: The gentleman will suspend. The chair is advised by the parliamentarian that under section 18 of title 3, United States Code, no debate is allowed in the joint session. If the gentleman has a point of order, please state the point of order.

DEUTSCH: Mr. President, there are many Americans who still believe that the results we are going to certify today are illegitimate.

GORE: The gentleman will suspend. If the gentleman from Florida has a point of order, he may state the point of order at this time. Otherwise, the gentleman will suspend.

DEUTSCH: I will note the absence of quorum and respectfully request that we delay the proceedings until quorum is present.

GORE: The chair is advised by the parliamentarian that section 17 of title 3, United States Code, prescribes a single procedure for resolution of either an objection to a certificate or other questions arising in the matter. That includes a point of order that a quorum is not present.

The chair rules on the advice of the parliamentarian that the point order that a quorum is not present is subject to the requirement that it be in writing and signed by both a member of the House of Representatives and a senator. Is the point of order in writing and signed not only by member of the House of representatives, but also a senator?

DEUTSCH: It is in writing, but I do not have a senator.

GORE: The point order may not be received.

HASTINGS: Mr. President, and I take great pride in calling you that, I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud and an attempt to suppress...

GORE: The chair...

HASTINGS: ... voter turnout.

GORE: The chair must remind members that under session 18 of title 3, United States Code, no debate is allowed in the joint session.

HASTINGS: Thank you, Mr. President.

To answer your question, Mr. President, the objection is in writing, signed by a number of members of the House of Representatives but not by a member of the Senate.

Thank you, Mr. President.

WATERS: I rise to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes.

GORE: Is the objection in writing and signed by member of the House and a senator?

WATERS: The objection is in writing, and I don't care that it is not it is not signed by a member of the Senate.

REP. BOB FILNER (D), CALIFORNIA: I have an objection to the electoral votes from Florida.

GORE: Is the objection in writing? Is it signed by a member of the House of Representatives and a senator?

FILNER: No, it is not in writing, but I rise in solidarity with my colleagues who have previously expressed their objection.

GORE: The chair thanks the gentleman from Illinois, but -- hey.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BLACK: There were 13 objections in all, 12 from minority group members in the House of Representatives, last one saw was Bob Filner, who's a Democrat from California, a former professor, a big supporter of Al Gore, and clearly was just moved by the emotion of the moment.

They were all gavelled down. It was a great irony for the vice president. Here were some of his biggest supporters in the House of Representatives. He was clearly sympathetic, understood what they were trying to do, but he went right by the book. There was no debate allowed under the law that governs this joint session. There is also -- no objection can be heard unless it is signed by a House member and a senator.

Not a single senator would join members of the Congressional Black Caucus, much to their dismay. About a dozen members of the caucus walked out in protest, to protest the Florida vote, and then had a press conference in the gallery.


<snip>
America deserves verifiable & transparent electoral vote counts. It is shameful that we must still think Nov 2015 #1
Amen!! Stevepol Nov 2015 #6
"do we ever hear politicians speak out ..." ?? Not about B.S. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #51
I'm referring to speaking out about making election results transparent. think Nov 2015 #54
By "situation in Kansas" you mean the lawsuit. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #56
A real question Rilgin Nov 2015 #69
My criticism is the guy sorts the data by the criteria making the difference appear in the data L. Coyote Nov 2015 #72
still not understanding Rilgin Nov 2015 #80
this needs DOJ investigation, let's go! F'ing GOP wordpix Nov 2015 #62
No, all it needs is one minute of thinking, and it all falls apart. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #73
I think a good share of America doesn't give a crap. I don't think the Democratic Leadership rhett o rick Nov 2015 #84
I heard recently that California is working on voting machines that will have software JDPriestly Nov 2015 #89
Thank you. That sounds interesting. Will have to check into it. think Nov 2015 #92
Absolutely. tecelote Nov 2015 #95
And how do you propose we do that? Travis_0004 Nov 2015 #101
Paper ballots, hand counted, in public, cameras rolling, nothing less. Scuba Nov 2015 #2
I agree, I agree, I agree, I agree -- FULLY with each point. Stevepol Nov 2015 #11
Absolutely. avaistheone1 Nov 2015 #17
The only problem is getting those paper ballots in the ballot box from the precinct LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #20
Nothing's perfect, but methods of defrauding paper ballots... JHB Nov 2015 #50
Count posted on precinct door, with cameras rolling, SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #82
+1 Jack Rabbit Nov 2015 #37
This seems pretty compelling Dem2 Nov 2015 #3
Exactly the opposite if you are trained in statistical analysis, then it is truly COMIC and tragic L. Coyote Nov 2015 #38
I don't understand what to heck you're talking about. Stevepol Nov 2015 #61
That makes 2 of us Dem2 Nov 2015 #65
If only it was only two ... L. Coyote Nov 2015 #68
I posted an article Dem2 Nov 2015 #71
Without a bit of analysis or, apparently, whose bidding you ar doing by spreading this. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #74
Ahhh, so I'm supposed to know that this analysis is incorrect Dem2 Nov 2015 #77
Did you search DU to read other threads about this person L. Coyote Nov 2015 #81
Shoot the messenger Dem2 Nov 2015 #83
Except "the pattern of the voting results are different from the pattern of results we would expect" L. Coyote Nov 2015 #66
How do you explain that Kentucky voted for a Republican governor by 9 points and then for JDPriestly Nov 2015 #91
I don't. I commented on part of the article, the CVS idea. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #94
Democratic leadership should be screaming about this, but.....Crickets. Dont call me Shirley Nov 2015 #4
precedent? heaven05 Nov 2015 #9
^^^ X2 ^^^ Omaha Steve Nov 2015 #12
There are probably a hundred other examples of equally preposterous results. Stevepol Nov 2015 #14
Brad is a journalist, not an election integrity investigator himself, a reporter L. Coyote Nov 2015 #34
thanks heaven05 Nov 2015 #59
I've followed LittleGirl Nov 2015 #93
flashback.. G_j Nov 2015 #15
They showed integrity and courage mountain grammy Nov 2015 #24
Coup is the correct term nt G_j Nov 2015 #26
A coup overthows the whole government usually. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #70
^^^^ THIS ^^^^ beerandjesus Nov 2015 #55
thank you heaven05 Nov 2015 #60
Heartbreaking. Democracy went out with a whimper.Who will fight to reinstate it? The Wielding Truth Nov 2015 #76
I believe you mean Catherine Harris? n/t aggiesal Nov 2015 #22
you are right heaven05 Nov 2015 #58
Katherine Harris..... Bluenorthwest Nov 2015 #29
thanks heaven05 Nov 2015 #57
And not ONE Democratic Senator Le Taz Hot Nov 2015 #35
Boxer joins challenge to Ohio's vote result L. Coyote Nov 2015 #41
2000 Le Taz Hot Nov 2015 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author csziggy Nov 2015 #67
Katherine Harris Raster Nov 2015 #88
like I said earlier heaven05 Nov 2015 #98
no worries. I responded to your post and at that time, I saw no others. Raster Nov 2015 #99
I remember everything you said heaven05 Nov 2015 #100
I hope this Delphinus Nov 2015 #5
It won't, pure BS. It is ignored for a reason, poppycock can't fly. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #43
Scary shit get the red out Nov 2015 #7
It's an integral part of rightward leaning personalities that winning by any means is ok. GoneFishin Nov 2015 #8
One wonders if the Justice Department has any jurisdiction? DFW Nov 2015 #10
Present them with anything credible, and they will do what they are supposed to. But this L. Coyote Nov 2015 #45
Well... MynameisBlarney Nov 2015 #13
Not a thing. Fuddnik Nov 2015 #39
Republicans cheat ... end of story Botany Nov 2015 #16
Yes, very disconcerting and in need of a real investigation, not in need of obfuscation L. Coyote Nov 2015 #46
As I suspected. Maineman Nov 2015 #18
regardless of the polling methods RussBLib Nov 2015 #19
But, but, but... 2naSalit Nov 2015 #23
I would have thought if they were going to cheat, yeoman6987 Nov 2015 #52
That's what electronic voting is for! Easy fraud. nt valerief Nov 2015 #21
I believe the GOP will have this perfected by the 2016 election mountain grammy Nov 2015 #25
Republicans are right & we need voter ID laws. HassleCat Nov 2015 #27
republicans lie, cheat and steal every day elmac Nov 2015 #28
Another stolen election zentrum Nov 2015 #30
The OP should read "Charnin says...." That does not make it true. Opposite is the case, NOT TRUE. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #31
So the analysis in the OP is the actual fraud. Bonx Nov 2015 #49
It matters not who screams FIRE in a smokey theatre L. Coyote Nov 2015 #53
the size of a precinct should not correlate i-should- be-working Nov 2015 #63
What were the EXIT polls in KY on the Gov race. That is the real tell. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #32
I looked for them myself. Couldn't locate any. pa28 Nov 2015 #85
Exit polls are sampling. After the count the stats are not inferential. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #86
Thanks. Oh well. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #87
Let me guess.. Central tabulators? lostnfound Nov 2015 #33
Some Florida charts and data here. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #48
We should bring in election observers Fritz Walter Nov 2015 #36
It is quite curious that losing candidates never seem to believe this Freddie Stubbs Nov 2015 #40
Candidates know better, they understand that this is just internet woo and booksellers at work. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #47
They can't beat us Faux pas Nov 2015 #42
It Happens Over And Over colsohlibgal Nov 2015 #64
This needs to get proof so hard even the the thugs can't deny Union Label Nov 2015 #75
KFE. Kentucky Fraud Election. Tommy_Carcetti Nov 2015 #78
A bucket o' ballots... Blue Owl Nov 2015 #79
Ditto Wisconsin Pharaoh Nov 2015 #90
Time To Do Something About This billhicks76 Nov 2015 #96
Way passed time. lonestarnot Nov 2015 #97
Given the down ticket victories I suspected that this might be the case. blackspade Nov 2015 #102
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Analysis Of Kentucky Elec...»Reply #15