Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
26. It's an important publication.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:20 PM
Jan 2016

A real resource. Its founders are committed to excellence. The work, profound.

Look what David Talbot reported at the Passing the Torch conference at Duquesne in 2013:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024105197

As a Democrat, a DUer and as a citizen of the United States, I was proud to attend "Passing the Torch: An International Symposium on the 50th Anniversary of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy" at Duquesne University.

One of the important speakers there was David Talbot, author of "Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years." As the founder of Salon.com, the man of letters also understands new media and its import for democracy and our republic.



David Talbot did not mince words in his presentation at Duquesne. He publicly named former CIA director Allen Dulles not only as participant in the cover-up of events concerning CIA in the assassination of President Kennedy, Talbot said Dulles was the chief architect of the assassination.

Mr. Talbot has worked for more than two years on a book that I believe will shake the nation's financial and political establishment to its core. Here are Mr. Talbot's words, outlining why:



...I think what we're going to show over the next few years is that Allen Welsh Dulles was much more centrally involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, and its cover-up, than Lee Harvey Oswald.

Fifty years later, it's finally time to give the man his rightful place in history. In his day, Allen Dulles was America's most legendary spymaster, the longest-serving director of the CIA. He took great pleasure in regaling the public about his espionage triumphs. But, for obvious reasons, he could never take credit for his biggest and boldest covert operation:
the killing of the President of the United States in broad daylight on the streets of an American city.

I hope that my forthcoming book, which will be titled "The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, JFK and the Epic Battle for America's Soul" will at long last give Mr. Dulles his due. As I say in my title of my remarks this morning, I believe Allen Dulles truly was the "Chairman of the Board of the Kennedy Assassination."

In September 1965, nearly two years after Kennedy was violently removed from office, Allen Dulles went for a stroll near his home in Georgetown with a young magazine editor named William Morris. The old spymaster, long since retired, struck Morris as an amiable, avuncular character until the name Kennedy suddenly came up in the conversation. Suddenly a dark cloud crossed the old man's brow.

"That little Kennedy," he spat out. "He thought he was a god."

Allen Dulles knew who the true overlords of American power were. (They were) men like him and his brother, not Jack and Bobby Kennedy. The Kennedys were mere upstarts in comparison to the Dulles family. The Dulles dynasty boasted diplomats and international bankers and three secretaries of state. The Kennedy clan, by comparison, was distinguished by saloon keepers and ward healers. When paterfamilias Joseph Kennedy was amassing his fortune as a movie mogul and stock gambler, Dulles and his older brother were running Wall Street from their perch at the world's largest law firm, Sullivan and Cromwell and creating a new global financial order.

During the Cold War, President Eisenhower outsourced the country's foreign policy to the Dulles Brothers, with Secretary of State John Foster Dulles serving as the architect of Washington's global crusade against communism, and Allen Dulles carrying out the darker chores of empire.

Soviet leader Nikita Krushchev who kept looking for a way out of the Cold War noose but found himself repeatedly checkmated by the Dulleses remarked at one point, "One shuddered at what great force was in the Dulles Brothers' hands."

The Dulles Brothers stood at the very apex of American power, straddling an elite network that connected Wall Street, Washington, big oil and international finance. John Foster Dulles was the ultimate counselor for that overworld that ruled the country's government and business, and his younger brother Allen was at privileged circles master of intrigue and subversion, its enforcer...



Mr. Talbot had a lot more to say about the Dulles Brothers, especially Allen Dulles as head of CIA. One of the most important things to remember, Dulles, even after he was out of office, continued to command the respect of people like James Jesus Angleton and Richard Helms, people he had promoted to their positions of power, and people who kept their knowledge of CIA assassination programs away from President Kennedy and the various government investigators who would later ask them about them.

Something I'm personally proud to add: Dulles and his brother are two of the main founders of the BFEE, a term Bartcop coined and I borrow to denote the War Party affiliated with the right wing Wall Street crowd that infested Washington for much of the late 19th and 20th century. Allen Dulles was a good friend and business associate of Prescott Sheldon Bush, Sr.

During the Depression, they tried to overthrow FDR. Before and during World War II, they did business with Hitler. After the war, they imported NAZIs to help fight the commies and build up a case for the Military Industrial Complex. They've done a lot since, from Vietnam to Iraq.

Where does Salon.com and DU fit in all of this? They serve to spread the truth about the government and how its secret services operate in service to wealth before service to the People. Which is democratic? Which is fascistic? Secret Government or Democracy?
I like their articles! n/t RKP5637 Jan 2016 #1
Who was running down the online mag? Baitball Blogger Jan 2016 #2
i usually like them, but sometimes they are a bit too radical for me Amishman Jan 2016 #3
It used to be much better but has become very clickbaity of late. Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #4
Well, when they claim that those loons in OR have heavy artillery, GGJohn Jan 2016 #5
I saw people complaining about Salon last week. Thought it was odd. I'll keep on it and see if it applegrove Jan 2016 #7
I wasn't one of them, I'm just commenting on their glaring mistake, one GGJohn Jan 2016 #9
Used to be good. Click bait now. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #6
Salon is fine. But one of their writers, H.A. Goodman, endorsed Rand Paul a year ago. pnwmom Jan 2016 #8
I thought Goodman wrote for Huffington Post. Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2016 #11
Yes, he writes for Salon. He gets around, apparently. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #12
Spreading his thinly disguised cheer everywhere. nt Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2016 #18
It's a mixed bag - some good articles, some really silly. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #10
What I've see is typically emotion driven clickbait. ileus Jan 2016 #13
I used to think they were legit until I noticed that all they push was divisiveness. Shandris Jan 2016 #14
I'll pop in over there once in a while. saltpoint Jan 2016 #15
There's some great content there and some absolute trash. Johonny Jan 2016 #16
It was a regular stop a few years ago redstateblues Jan 2016 #17
They were losing money and then turned into a clickbait publication LittleBlue Jan 2016 #19
Low quality control, poor distinction between opinion and reportage anigbrowl Jan 2016 #20
I think it is pretty good and usually has a broad cross section of liberal opinion Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #21
they used to be a lot better joeybee12 Jan 2016 #22
One step above HuffPo. (Marginally.) n/t X_Digger Jan 2016 #23
Some far out articles mid to end 2015 Gods Slayer Jan 2016 #24
Used to be really good XemaSab Jan 2016 #25
It's an important publication. Octafish Jan 2016 #26
A good reason not to read Salon kwassa Jan 2016 #27
Ignorance is not bliss when it comes to the assassination of President Kennedy. Octafish Jan 2016 #30
I don't subsribe to the idea someone else was involved with Oswald. Didn't as a child. Oswald applegrove Jan 2016 #28
Great. Talbot says otherwise. Octafish Jan 2016 #31
SALON has made some DUers very defensive about their white privilege mwrguy Jan 2016 #29
Used to be good melman Jan 2016 #32
Used to be good. romanic Jan 2016 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What do people think of t...»Reply #26