General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm ready for a revolution [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)I posted something about Obama - not about LGBT rights, but about Obama - in the "heat of an LGBT DOMA controversy" - which, in your mind, means I was blatantly anti-LGBT in a discussion that had nothing to do with LGBTers at all.
But, ya know, it was posted at the same time as a controversy about something else that was going on in other discussion threads - and therefore, (I mean, isn't it obvious?) my "intent" was to rail against the LGBT community by posting something about Obama in a thread that had nothing to do with the LGBT community.
It's all so clear to me now.
"And, as you can see by the comments, we took it exactly as such. Now, of course, all the 666 comments are missing."
How can I "see" by the comments that are missing? And how can you say the LGBT community "took it as such" - whatever that means - when all of the comments are missing? Are we all supposed to just rely on your photographic memory of 666 comments?
I asked you for links to my anti-LGBT posts. You can't come up with any - because they don't exist.
It's as simple as that.
Funny how I was able to use Google to come up with several of my pro-LGBT rights OPs, and you can't come up with a single anti-LGBT post of mine - not one - even though you have equal access to Google.
LINK or SLINK.