Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
10. Chile was a testbed for Global Austerity & Austerity USA
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:40 PM
Jun 2016
"The Chicago Boys in Chile: Economic Freedom's Awful Toll"

Orlando Letelier
August 28, 1976

EXCERPT...

The Economic Prescription and Chile's Reality

SNIP...

These are the basic principles of the economic model offered by Friedman and his followers and adopted by the Chilean junta: that the only possible framework for economic development is one within which the private sector can freely operate; that private enterprise is the most efficient form of economic organization and that, therefore, the private sector should be the predominant factor in the economy. Prices should fluctuate freely in accordance with the laws of competition. Inflation, the worst enemy of economic progress, is the direct result of monetary expansion and can be eliminated only by a drastic reduction of government spending.

Except in present-day Chile, no government in the world gives private enterprise an absolutely free hand. That is so because every economist (except Friedman and his followers) has known for decades that, in the real life of capitalism, there is no such thing as the perfect competition described by classical liberal economists. In March 1975, in Santiago, a newsman dared suggest to Friedman that even in more advanced capitalist countries, as for example the United States, the government applies various types of controls on the economy. Mr. Friedman answered: I have always been against it, I don't approve of them. I believe we should not apply them. I am against economic intervention by the government, in my own country, as well as in Chile or anywhere else (Que Pasa, Chilean weekly, April 3, 1975).

SNIP...

A Rationale tor Power

SNIP...

Until September 11, 1973, the date of the coup, Chilean society had been characterized by the increasing participation of the working class and its political parties in economic and social decision making. Since about 1900, employing the mechanisms of representative democracy, workers had steadily gained new economic, social and political power. The election of Salvador Allende as President of Chile was the culmination of this process. For the first time in history a society attempted to build socialism by peaceful means. During Allende's time in office, there was a marked improvement in the conditions of employment, health, housing, land tenure and education of the masses. And as this occurred, the privileged domestic groups and the dominant foreign interests perceived themselves to be seriously threatened.

Despite strong financial and political pressure from abroad and efforts to manipulate the attitudes of the middle class by propaganda, popular support for the Allende government increased significantly between 1970 and 1973. In March 1973, only five months before the military coup, there were Congressional elections in Chile. The political parties of the Popular Unity increased their share of the votes by more than 7 percentage points over their totals in the Presidential election of 1970. This was the first time in Chilean history that the political parties supporting the administration in power gained votes during a midterm election. The trend convinced the national bourgeoisie and its foreign supporters that they would be unable to recoup their privileges through the democratic process. That is why they resolved to destroy the democratic system and the institutions of the state, and, through an alliance with the military, to seize power by force.

In such a context, concentration of wealth is no accident, but a rule; it is not the marginal outcome of a difficult situation -- as they would like the world to believe -- but the base for a social project; it is not an economic liability but a temporary political success. Their real failure is not their apparent inability to redistribute wealth or to generate a more even path of development (these are not their priorities) but their inability to convince the majority of Chileans that their policies are reasonable and necessary. In short, they have failed to destroy the consciousness of the Chilean people. The economic plan has had to be enforced, and in the Chilean context that could be done only by the killing of thousands, the establishment of concentration camps all over the country, the jailing of more than 100,000 persons in three years, the closing of trade unions and neighbourhood organizations, and the prohibition of all political activities and all forms of free expression.

While the Chicago boys have provided an appearance of technical respectability to the laissez-faire dreams and political greed of the old landowning oligarchy and upper bourgeoisie of monopolists and financial speculators, the military has applied the brutal force required to achieve those goals. Repression for the majorities and economic freedom for small privileged groups are in Chile two sides of the same coin.

CONTINUED...

http://www.ditext.com/letelier/chicago.html

Duh highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #1
Greece, Still Paying for Europe’s Spite By YANIS VAROUFAKIS elleng Jun 2016 #2
Stiglitz: "Bernie is right". Lodestar Jun 2016 #3
Well this thread will get ignored by the usual suspects. Rex Jun 2016 #4
Yep...because these developments are as good as an endorsement for Lodestar Jun 2016 #5
Yea, I was wondering when the Clintons and the 'democrat' elite would join them Ferd Berfel Jun 2016 #15
Isn't redistributing wealth and creating more laws authoritarian? Mosby Jun 2016 #18
Gee, IMF, tell us something we don't know Jack Rabbit Jun 2016 #6
It's not so much that we don't know it gratuitous Jun 2016 #7
There is a class of idiots that believe neoliberalism is foundational to this nation. Enthusiast Jun 2016 #8
Screw the IMF. They knew this was happening and kept on keeping on AllyCat Jun 2016 #9
Chile was a testbed for Global Austerity & Austerity USA Octafish Jun 2016 #10
I knew this almost 30 years ago MrScorpio Jun 2016 #11
Because the fail has finally reached its end game. Nowhere else to hide. Lodestar Jun 2016 #20
Most Americans have no idea what the term means nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #12
This story was also covered sulphurdunn Jun 2016 #13
this has been obvious for years and why does it take so fucking long to change anything??? Fast Walker 52 Jun 2016 #14
Unfortunately Nothing Will Change Ccarmona Jun 2016 #16
It took them awhile to bilk the multitudes and paint themselves into Lodestar Jun 2016 #22
K & R. How many years and decades before serious efforts to end it will start? appalachiablue Jun 2016 #17
Perhaps Christine Legarde's past experience as an anti-trust and labor lawyer is causing the IMF to pampango Jun 2016 #19
Why is it called Neo Liberalism when most of the conservatives support it? UCmeNdc Jun 2016 #21
Doubleplusgood newspeak. Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #26
So rapacious greed won't solve every problem? moondust Jun 2016 #23
Amazing malaise Jun 2016 #24
Economic Lysenkoism JHB Jun 2016 #25
K&R SamKnause Jun 2016 #27
Neoliberalism has not been a failure... it has done exactly what the IMF and the 1% wanted... Raster Jun 2016 #28
Why Are So Many Oblivious To This Reality? colsohlibgal Jun 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After Empowering the 1% a...»Reply #10