Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheBlackAdder

(28,183 posts)
32. The subject line acts like a tweet, when verbosity is not required. It cuts down a lot of clutter.
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 06:46 PM
Jan 2017

.


Other BBS constructs are arcane--having never fully matured from the late 80s and early 90s.


It's almost like showing someone TSO when they are used to command line editors. Those who use VI or other basic editors resist the fluidity of full screen editors and come up with all kinds of excuses why they shouldn't learn to a higher-level offering. instead, they struggle with added typos and dropped inserts and deletes from time to time.


I can understand that mindset some degree, because VI is stuck in the old Unix days. Many people need to actively use it or else they forget how shitty it is and struggle with remembering the nuances of its crappiness, for when the instability of their builds knock out the full screen editors. But, that actually comes down to the unstructured Wild West mentality of the Unix systems programmers.


.

I guess not. Auntie Bush Jan 2017 #1
Example? Iggo Jan 2017 #2
nope. spanone Jan 2017 #3
Works fine for me MrScorpio Jan 2017 #4
No riverwalker Jan 2017 #5
No. underpants Jan 2017 #6
thing is bigtree Jan 2017 #7
For 15 years it has worked just fine for me. 11 Bravo Jan 2017 #8
No, I like it fine. n/t whathehell Jan 2017 #9
I mean that responses on complex issues are often less expansive MrPurple Jan 2017 #10
If you mean you'd rather have the common format of linear replies without any structure, muriel_volestrangler Jan 2017 #23
I have been around the message boards 14-15 years now...... Jim Beard Jan 2017 #11
Nope, beautiful format for me, not that I know many other sites. Since you're zeroing in on UTUSN Jan 2017 #12
It's clean and simple Retrograde Jan 2017 #13
If it ain't broke, yortsed snacilbuper Jan 2017 #14
What altered subject lines? MineralMan Jan 2017 #15
Huh? malaise Jan 2017 #16
No. DU is by far the best I visit. hunter Jan 2017 #17
The only change I'd like is a wee bit longer subject line. Just several more characters would be gre eleny Jan 2017 #18
Just you. kentuck Jan 2017 #19
I find the format clean and easy to follow the threads and subthreads. If your concern is..... Hekate Jan 2017 #20
I didn't at first, but after using a while it is great Lee-Lee Jan 2017 #21
No I think it's great treestar Jan 2017 #22
It is funny you bring the format into question Control-Z Jan 2017 #24
I like the option of one sentence responses (like this one). n/t Motown_Johnny Jan 2017 #25
Haven't seen one I liked better than this one. 2naSalit Jan 2017 #26
How about one word replies? eom guillaumeb Jan 2017 #27
Ew Warpy Jan 2017 #30
Sorry. guillaumeb Jan 2017 #31
I like the tree format here Bradical79 Jan 2017 #28
No Warpy Jan 2017 #29
The subject line acts like a tweet, when verbosity is not required. It cuts down a lot of clutter. TheBlackAdder Jan 2017 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does anyone else dislike ...»Reply #32