Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,804 posts)
25. I finally found another instance of this attempt to quash (from the RNC convention)
Mon Mar 27, 2017, 07:22 AM
Mar 2017
https://www.c-span.org/video/?412506-101/republican-national-committee-platform-hearings-part-2&start=538#

Unidentified Speaker >> PAGE ONE LINE 32-35.

Unidentified Speaker >> THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. MY AMENDMENT WOULD STRIKE OUT THE LANGUAGE TO THE EVENT -- THE REASON FOR STRIKING OUT THIS LANGUAGE IS RONALD REAGAN DID A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF WORK TO TRY TO KEEP US OUT OF A HOT WAR WITH RUSSIA. WE SHOULD KEEP IN MIND RUSSIA IS A NUCLEAR SUPERPOWER AND WHAT WE ARE SPILLING OUT HERE, SANCTIONS AND ARMING THEIR ENEMIES, THOSE ARE ACTS OF WAR. AND UNLESS WE ARE PREPARED TO GO TO WAR WITH A NUCLEAR SUPERPOWER, I THINK WE NEED TO BE A LOT MORE CAUTIOUS ABOUT DECLARING OUR INTENTION TO DO OF WAR AGAINST THEM. SO I THINK THIS STATEMENT IS OVERLY AGGRESSIVE AND I DO NOT THINK IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR NATION TO BE DECLARING THIS, IN SO I RECOMMEND WE STRIKE THIS LANGUAGE FROM THE PLATFORM.

Unidentified Speaker >> THE AMENDMENT CALLS FOR STRIKING LINES 32-35. CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE?

Unidentified Speaker >> WE DEBATED THIS FULLY YESTERDAY DURING THE MEETING AND IT WAS DEFEATED AND I WOULD ASK THAT WE DEFEATED AGAIN TODAY. AND YOU. ASK DELEGATE FROM NEW YORK.

Unidentified Speaker >> CYCLE IN QUESTION. QUESTION HAS BEEN CALLED. I WANT TO VOTE IMMEDIATELY. THE MOTION IS UP FOR DEBATE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION FROM THE DELEGATE...


The CSPAN-recorded proceedings mentioned above from the day before, were corrupted (although still available but without a transcript), but I was able to find the above 2nd attempt to change that amendment... The link goes right to the portion where the above takes place.
So much of Steele's dossier has been confirmed by now. Everything except the part pnwmom Mar 2017 #1
The gross part is quite potential relevant... JenniferJuniper Mar 2017 #3
Yes, the threat of blackmail is huge. You may be too young (that's a compliment!!!)... George II Mar 2017 #15
I am too young to remember Christine but JenniferJuniper Mar 2017 #17
Oh, I care! Because the Righteous Right needs it rubbed in their faces, you should pardon the WinkyDink Mar 2017 #22
K&R BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #2
Remember the effort by dRumpf's team at the repug convention.... lastlib Mar 2017 #18
I finally found another instance of this attempt to quash (from the RNC convention) BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #25
I watched that part of the video. I was interested in a number of things. Chiyo-chichi Mar 2017 #33
Yeah I have been trying to scan through the videos BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #34
I commend you for trying to research this. Chiyo-chichi Mar 2017 #35
Source E is clearly Boris Epshteyn scheming daemons Mar 2017 #4
Good hypothesis. iluvtennis Mar 2017 #6
That makes the most sense to me too. nt GliderGuider Mar 2017 #9
Yes, cilla4progress Mar 2017 #10
yep, "ethnic Russian" Ligyron Mar 2017 #13
Not Erovinkin? (n/t) thesquanderer Mar 2017 #19
It was most likely Erovinkin Vinnie From Indy Mar 2017 #27
Bingo! NewRedDawn Mar 2017 #29
So...Putin using Trump as a Russian spy? Cracklin Charlie Mar 2017 #5
I am curious about who were "agents/facilitators within Democratic Party structure"???? wishstar Mar 2017 #7
If you think about it, it's pretty obvious Generic Brad Mar 2017 #8
I have ideas, but not sure if I'm correct. DangerousRhythm Mar 2017 #11
hint? flamingdem Mar 2017 #20
I have an idea and they have shown all of their tax returns either uponit7771 Mar 2017 #31
What specifically makes it "pretty obvious?" LanternWaste Mar 2017 #38
That is a very good question. paleotn Mar 2017 #14
Was the $50 million profit paid to trump for a property to fund his campaign? L. Coyote Mar 2017 #12
It makes sense bucolic_frolic Mar 2017 #16
Yes, those were the obvious ones the waving hand was the second obvious uponit7771 Mar 2017 #32
Steele is legit, no reason any longer to doubt the pee tapes. sarcasmo Mar 2017 #21
Agree...Been legit forever nt iluvtennis Mar 2017 #23
Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2017 #24
K&R! gademocrat7 Mar 2017 #26
Michael Steele has this information? Ohhhh, you mean Christopher Steele SharonClark Mar 2017 #28
WOW Gothmog Mar 2017 #30
"Firstly there were agents within the Democratic Party structure itself..." librechik Mar 2017 #36
Yes indeed. NewRedDawn Mar 2017 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joy Reid: Excerpts from S...»Reply #25