Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: A serious question: [View all]

unblock

(56,111 posts)
7. it's not about gorsuch in particular. it's about winning.
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 06:29 PM
Apr 2017

they screw garland because he was nominated by a democrat and they could.

they're changing the rules to get gorsuch in because he was nominated by a republican and they can.


letting democrats successfully filibuster a nominee would be a "win" for democrats even if the replacement nominee is 10 times worse. in fact, now that they've done away with the filibuster, they could get an ever wackier guy on the court. they don't even care about that because that wouldn't generate a "win" headline for them.

they want gorsuch because this gets them a "win" headline.

that's pretty much all there is to it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A serious question»Reply #7