Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
No it is against ucmj to carry out immoral orders TEB May 2017 #1
I don't think that is true -illegal/unlawful yes, but not immoral DrDan May 2017 #10
Just as former infantry trooper TEB May 2017 #15
yes, "unlawful" - those can and should be disobeyed - not "immoral" DrDan May 2017 #17
Illegal yes unlawful same was not splitting hairs TEB May 2017 #20
not sure I undersatnd your post - but . . . you can disobey an order if it is illegal or unlawful DrDan May 2017 #24
the problem is that the military leadership Mosby May 2017 #25
well . . . yeah . . . when you decide to disobey an order the onus on on you DrDan May 2017 #27
Yes. Aristus May 2017 #2
I seem to recall we spent time in class Turbineguy May 2017 #3
The Constitutionally of the War Powers Resolution is something scholars have debated for decades Calista241 May 2017 #4
Yes. They take an oath to the Constitution, not the CIC. roamer65 May 2017 #5
" . . . and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States . . . " DrDan May 2017 #11
Technically, yes it is legal to refuse to obey an illegal order... Wounded Bear May 2017 #6
Military swears an oath to uphold the constitution, not a president. beachbum bob May 2017 #7
A relief to have clarity on this topic. Thanks. ATL Ebony May 2017 #8
tread carefully - that is not accurate DrDan May 2017 #12
Thanks but I hope there's protocol as to how to handle illegal CIC orders and ATL Ebony May 2017 #14
See my #13. nt stevenleser May 2017 #16
illegal orders can and should be disobeyed DrDan May 2017 #18
Officers swear an oath to uphold the constitution Brother Buzz May 2017 #9
That type of potentially illegal order is difficult for members of the military to refuse stevenleser May 2017 #13
"most" of those? Doreen May 2017 #19
Some are on a thin line stevenleser May 2017 #21
The simple reality is we know trump is capable of firing a nuke to cover his ass. Eliot Rosewater May 2017 #26
Use of nuclear weapons when not under attack requires POTUS to get concurrence from stevenleser May 2017 #29
Who would he have to get permission from specifically? Eliot Rosewater May 2017 #32
Not permission, concurrence from the SecDef. stevenleser May 2017 #33
Not only legal but it is required sarisataka May 2017 #22
I'm curious to know what your take is on the specific instance the OP asks about stevenleser May 2017 #30
The scenarios you spoke of sarisataka May 2017 #31
I was just following orders HAB911 May 2017 #23
Yes but OP asked about a specific kind of order and it wasn't to commit genocide stevenleser May 2017 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question: Is it legal for...»Reply #22