Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
recounts don't make sense without paper ballots... Sancho May 2017 #1
OK. I'm going to edit the OP to include what you said. Maraya1969 May 2017 #2
K & R Duppers May 2017 #3
Some random person on twitter who doesn't understand that elections are related mythology May 2017 #4
Remember the boxes that were damaged? Besides I'm sure whoever had their fingers in Maraya1969 May 2017 #11
Trump's win was within a polling error if that error was systematic Gravitycollapse May 2017 #17
Can anyone point me to a major election where a recount made a difference? n2doc May 2017 #5
Al Franken - Norm Coleman, Minnesota 2008 csziggy May 2017 #9
Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it can't Maraya1969 May 2017 #12
I want a unicorn, and I want it now! Demsrule86 May 2017 #6
Meanwhile while too many Dems say, 'This can't be done" and "This is wrong" and "Think Maraya1969 May 2017 #19
Elections are run by states...there is no method to do this... . you might as well ask for a unicorn Demsrule86 May 2017 #31
How would the DNC do that, exactly? MineralMan May 2017 #7
+1 onenote May 2017 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Maraya1969 May 2017 #13
In California, ANY legally registered voter can demand and receive a recount for any (or no) reason. Brother Buzz May 2017 #10
I don't know. But I know just letting it slide with no one trying to set up a nation wide system is Maraya1969 May 2017 #14
Let's put our money on winning elections convincingly...close election are easy to screw with... Demsrule86 May 2017 #32
I think a recount of the 2016 Presidential election would find it was not stolen. Gravitycollapse May 2017 #15
Does that explain the Senate loss and the House loss? Along with the mathematician's Maraya1969 May 2017 #16
Those are unlikelihoods not anomalies. Gravitycollapse May 2017 #18
You must have missed the mathematical conclusion that was printed on Twitter. Granted Maraya1969 May 2017 #20
The math teachers claim is useless without seeing the data and their analysis. Gravitycollapse May 2017 #22
Well take my, years ago, several advanced statistics studies. This was an anomoly Maraya1969 May 2017 #23
You haven't seen the math so you couldn't possibly know that right now. Gravitycollapse May 2017 #26
And the fact that I and others have been saying the same thing since the election. I didn't Maraya1969 May 2017 #25
Someone posted here that on the day of the election, before we were hacked, FL was in Maraya1969 May 2017 #21
Trump had a 45% chance of winning Florida (via. 538) Gravitycollapse May 2017 #24
OK let's take your number. Since when does someone lose 5% points in the same day? Maraya1969 May 2017 #27
The 45% prediction was of him winning, not his vote share. Gravitycollapse May 2017 #29
These are all just clues to be taken together. And did 538 use early voting for its calculations? Maraya1969 May 2017 #28
Early voting is a weak predictor of electoral outcome. Gravitycollapse May 2017 #30
The house is gerrymandered...I see signs it is slipping...but it's going to take a wave election. Demsrule86 May 2017 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The DNC must set up an au...»Reply #1