Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)

2. Is that really a road we would want to go down?

Reply to uppityperson (Original post)

Sat Jul 1, 2017, 01:33 PM

Jul 2017

Trump's loyalists relish any possibility of bringing up the Clinton's. And, a reasonable argument was made that he did exactly that when he maligned a witness in a case against him. Call it bullshit, but it's still an argument that could be resurrected and people would love to distract by pointing out hypocrisy. Pointing the finger back at them just creates a pointless argument.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

When do Trump's nasty tweets become libel? [View all] uppityperson Jul 2017 OP

There have been several that cross that line by definition but IANAL. onecaliberal Jul 2017 #1

Is that really a road we would want to go down? loyalsister Jul 2017 #2

What? uppityperson Jul 2017 #3

It's an ugly chapter loyalsister Jul 2017 #4

seriously? we should ignore donnie's multiple, outrageous string of libels because unblock Jul 2017 #5

I'm saying be careful or look like hypocrites loyalsister Jul 2017 #6

There's zero hypocrisy here. Clinton paid a price for his mistakes. unblock Jul 2017 #7

Calling out libel after defending it is a problem loyalsister Jul 2017 #8

So we should give Donnie a free pass on his treatment of women and his lies unblock Jul 2017 #9

Criticize it without trying to fit it into a civil violation loyalsister Jul 2017 #11

The passage of a couple of decades unblock Jul 2017 #12

Thank you uppityperson Jul 2017 #14

What exactly did Clinton say that could be madinmaryland Jul 2017 #16

Thank you for clarifying. I very much disagree with what you write, specifically saying let Don uppityperson Jul 2017 #13

It's deliberately hard to sue for libel for public figures mythology Jul 2017 #10

Thank you, there is that. Eom uppityperson Jul 2017 #15