Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Would you be in favor of retesting driving skills for older motorists? [View all]CountAllVotes
(22,240 posts)23. Correct
Which Age Group Causes The Most Car Accidents ?
Car accidents are one of the principal reasons of death due to unintentional injury, if the CDC statistics are to be believed! According to the report made by the CDCs National Center for Injury prevention and control, around 9.2 million kids below the age of 20 have been admitted to the emergency section due to an unintended injury and 12, 175 left dead since the first half of the present decade.
From the year 2000 to 2005, unintentional injury has been responsible for 44% of the deaths of children and teenagers below 20 years of age followed by death due the lack of any injury at 38 percent and intentional injury at 18 percent, while among the infants, deaths due to unintended injury is a mere 4 percent.
One of the primary reasons for unintentional injury includes motor vehicle accidents that affect 829 children per 100,000. In fact, 60 percent of the unintentional injuries are related to road traffic and road transportation. Males are more prone to death than females in unintentional injuries at a death rate of 19.3 against of 10.4 per 10,000 females. Racially, American Indians and the native males from Alaska have the highest death rate of 29.8 per 100,000 people while Asian or Pacific Islander females have the lowest at 5.4 per 100,000. The death rates of blacks and whites are similar at 19.5 per 100,000 people for boys and 10.5 per 100,000 people for girls.
Geographically, the northeast regions have the lowest death rates with Massachusetts at the lowest for kids aged 1 to 14 and for teens aged 15 to 19, the District of Columbia fared the lowest. Deaths related to transport were the highest across the South and the upper Midwest.
http://www.rocketswag.com/legal/personal-injury/auto-accident-settlements/Which-Age-Group-Causes-The-Most-Car-Accidents.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Would you be in favor of retesting driving skills for older motorists? [View all]
True Dough
Aug 2017
OP
Perhaps... I'm still amazed & disgusted that driver's education is no longer a requirement
hlthe2b
Aug 2017
#1
LOL, you got me on that one. Sometimes I just have to laugh rather than cry about my state I used to
Jim Beard
Aug 2017
#152
Yes, it was, in many schools. Not the driving part, but at a minimum the classroom lessons.
WinkyDink
Aug 2017
#76
It was in the schools my sister and I attended. Just because it wasn't in yours does NOT give
hlthe2b
Aug 2017
#132
I most certainly did not. I said "driver's education is no longer a requirement
hlthe2b
Aug 2017
#140
Yes, every octogenarian I knew had been in multiple accidents before they died.
TheBlackAdder
Aug 2017
#122
I am 70 and will be up for renewal in 7 months. Currently they don't require glasses..
Jim Beard
Aug 2017
#154
Yes. I am 60. I live in East Maricopa County, Arizona, home to numerous "snowbirds"...
Raster
Aug 2017
#7
Drivers over the age of 25 generally pay lower rates than those younger,
PoindexterOglethorpe
Aug 2017
#131
I bet they are more involved in certain types of accidents than 30-60 age drivers
LeftInTX
Aug 2017
#47
Call me next time brother I'm 58 and have never scored less than perfect on a driving test
ChubbyStar
Aug 2017
#20
I'm betting those that one to restrict older drivers aren't worried about their being injured more
hlthe2b
Aug 2017
#102
Why not raise the age to about 20? "Per mile driven, teen drivers ages 16 to 19 are nearly three
WinkyDink
Aug 2017
#30
That is a statement of opinion. The source, the CDC, says nothing about "experience.'
WinkyDink
Aug 2017
#74
Do you think hours behind the wheel of a car and experience contribute to good driving?
JoeStuckInOH
Aug 2017
#115
Yes. My 95 year old mother has a drivers license, but she should never be allowed to drive.
Binkie The Clown
Aug 2017
#37
I'd be in big trouble. Haven't parallel parked since my driving exam 52 years ago.
Vinca
Aug 2017
#42
The last time I parallel parked was when I was 16 during my driving test back in '75.
Kaleva
Aug 2017
#64
Nope... but one year re-testing for 16-19 years of age (causes more accidents)
LanternWaste
Aug 2017
#62
I think regardless of age, every, let's say 10 years, all drivers should have a retesting of driving
still_one
Aug 2017
#83
I agree Ocelot, age isn't a good criteria. Just test everyone every10 years, or whatever intervel
still_one
Aug 2017
#88
So why should older drivers be tested????? Let's treat all ages the same re testing based on....
LAS14
Aug 2017
#96
I think distracted (electronics) by millennials is a far greater menace, statistics do not support
FreeStateDemocrat
Aug 2017
#97
I am in favor of every driver having to be retested periodically to continue with license.
Justice
Aug 2017
#105
About 20 years ago I was walking in the local grocery store parking lot with my
XRubicon
Aug 2017
#107
Around KC where I live way more accidents are caused by young drivers.
leftyladyfrommo
Aug 2017
#128
would be of more comfort if there were public transportation options available
dembotoz
Aug 2017
#144
Yes, it"s hard for the family to take the keys away. Better for an official to do it.
SharonClark
Aug 2017
#160