General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance dropped case against Trump kids after a big donation [View all]Cicada
(4,533 posts)It is not corrupt to decide in favor of a campaign contributor. It is corrupt only if you make your decision because of a campaign contribution. You have no evidence Vance made his decision because of the contribution. I pointed out many reasons why it is unlikely Vance made his decision because of the contribution.
You did not answer my question about Comey. Do you agree that his decision was corrupt? My point is that there are many who think an action was corrupt when it was not.
There is a standard for bribery - which is the allegation against Vance. It requires taking an official action in return for something of value. You have zero evidence that Vance made his decision for the campaign contribution, and there are many reasons why that is very unlikely, some of which I previously mentioned.
We should not smear people without good evidence.
The notion Vance is corrupt, in my opinion, is absurd.