Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
hey thanks obama- anyone notice this in the article Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #1
Obama administration just thumbed their nose at us? CubicleGuy Mar 2015 #2
yea you missed the finger he stuck in our faces Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #3
with this issue they have continued the bush era-and court orders. riversedge Mar 2015 #4
The entire detailed legislative and legal history is what some folks are missing. Obama's White Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #5
They aren't missing anything, they are here for one reason, to bash Obama... tridim Mar 2015 #13
"well-settled legal interpretations." sounds like bush's excuse for water-boarding Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #27
You're missing the entire judicial branch treestar Mar 2015 #70
"The Most Transparent Administration in History" dirtydickcheney Mar 2015 #6
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #9
"Well, I meant transparentish" progressoid Mar 2015 #31
Apparently there's no room for strong dissent here, with #9 being hidden. Sad. 7962 Mar 2015 #46
+1. candelista Mar 2015 #49
It was a lie. blkmusclmachine Mar 2015 #34
Court rulings treestar Mar 2015 #65
No you missed the ruling -- or agree with it. former9thward Mar 2015 #85
Well, Judicial Watch will have a sad. It's a 2009 ruling. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #7
Codifying settled law, in the legal sense, is now cause for outrage directed personally at Obama for some folks it seems. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #11
ODS has no respect for facts. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #14
This is seriously fucked up. Rotten to the core. Ed Suspicious Mar 2015 #8
Something smells rotten, but maybe you are facing in the wrong direction, sir? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Mar 2015 #10
Erm, so all that Clinton-hunting, breaking down the walls of the White House Baitball Blogger Mar 2015 #12
Is that even possible? mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2015 #15
So uhm ...no more Nixon tapes? L0oniX Mar 2015 #17
I think that was pre-FOIA. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2015 #20
Ummm. No. No more demanding documentation about how the WH onenote Mar 2015 #55
"consistent with court rulings that hold that the office is not subject to the transparency law." elleng Mar 2015 #18
I'll be waiting for tomorrow's Federal Register. NT mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2015 #19
Why wait. You can read it now. onenote Mar 2015 #24
Here it is. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2015 #66
+1 treestar Mar 2015 #67
This ruling applies to the WH Office of Administration and implements a 2009 apellate decision onenote Mar 2015 #21
Thanks. Nothing like FACTS! elleng Mar 2015 #23
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? candelista Mar 2015 #56
Most transparent liberal POTUS evaaaaa!!1!1!1!1!!! obxhead Mar 2015 #22
Trying to protect Hillary's campaign, perhaps? Blue_Tires Mar 2015 #25
It sickens me to see a post TM99 Mar 2015 #26
Ditto - on your headline only. The ODS on DU in times like these is truly sickening. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #28
couldn't agree more marym625 Mar 2015 #33
Transparency my ass - just another perty speech by a slick-talking front for the Oligarchs. blkmusclmachine Mar 2015 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Mar 2015 #37
+1. candelista Mar 2015 #57
No, it's consistent with court rulings, which is another branch treestar Mar 2015 #68
Thank you for outing yourself TM99 Mar 2015 #79
Americans should simply trust the President to be transparent MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #29
Notice anything missing from this thread? marym625 Mar 2015 #35
Blue links? OnyxCollie Mar 2015 #41
Exactly! :) marym625 Mar 2015 #43
Much of The Swarm? MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #45
"Mom's Taxi" has to make a stop at the grocery store, OnyxCollie Mar 2015 #50
I'm OK now. I figured out a strategy. MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #53
hide! marym625 Mar 2015 #52
Preparing for Hillary. Fearless Mar 2015 #30
That's just about right marym625 Mar 2015 #32
Riiiiight....... DeSwiss Mar 2015 #38
Sigh...Sad That....... KoKo Mar 2015 #39
I'd say you've covered all the main rationalizations....... DeSwiss Mar 2015 #40
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! OnyxCollie Mar 2015 #42
About the Office of Administration Sunlei Mar 2015 #44
Everyone should read your post. candelista Mar 2015 #48
I don't see anything to be scared of. You can FOIA out of those offices. Sunlei Mar 2015 #60
What? candelista Mar 2015 #74
sorry, we're on a different page. Sunlei Mar 2015 #75
"You can get any information you want"? candelista Mar 2015 #93
Yes its the freakin' center of the universe. Now name one person who has worked onenote Mar 2015 #54
So why does he wanna keep it secret? candelista Mar 2015 #58
In 2009 the courts held that the statute doesn't apply to it OA in a suit brought in 2007 onenote Mar 2015 #59
Citation? candelista Mar 2015 #73
Included in the federal register announcement of the removal of the rule onenote Mar 2015 #76
I recall that Obama promised transparency in his administration when he ran for president JDPriestly Mar 2015 #47
A court ruled in 2009 that the FOIA statute didn't cover the WH Office of Administration onenote Mar 2015 #51
Well, if it is legal, then by all means it is right. TM99 Mar 2015 #61
Lovely rant. Has nothing to do with the act of taking an unenforced and unenforceable onenote Mar 2015 #64
Bullshit. TM99 Mar 2015 #80
Wronger than wrong. onenote Mar 2015 #81
I am not a lawyer. TM99 Mar 2015 #82
I am not surprised. onenote Mar 2015 #84
And you do not surprise me either. TM99 Mar 2015 #88
I read it before you did I'm quite certain. onenote Mar 2015 #90
Pathetic really. TM99 Mar 2015 #94
I take a lot of things seriously. You seem to not to be able to. onenote Mar 2015 #95
Do you have the name of the case in which that ruling was issued? JDPriestly Mar 2015 #72
Included in the Federal Register item announcing the removal of the rule onenote Mar 2015 #77
Thanks. JDPriestly Mar 2015 #78
"Got a problem? Take it up with Congress and the courts." former9thward Mar 2015 #86
My position on what specifically? onenote Mar 2015 #87
Court rulings treestar Mar 2015 #69
The promised transparency has dwindled year by year. JDPriestly Mar 2015 #71
lack of any thing father founding Mar 2015 #62
ABC did something on his twitter account jakeXT Mar 2015 #63
Do any cowards care to hide MY post about this? MrMickeysMom Mar 2015 #83
Politics is nothing more than a team sport these days. TM99 Mar 2015 #89
Well said, ™... MrMickeysMom Mar 2015 #91
Kill him for his bad verses! stevenleser Mar 2015 #92
The tortured justifications for this in this thread are just sad. marmar Mar 2015 #96
First and foremost, Obama is a politician. Before he is anything else we want him to be. Calista241 Mar 2015 #97
So, no one can watch the watchers? Octafish Mar 2015 #98
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House office to del...»Reply #98