Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Iran Backs Away From Key Detail in Nuclear Deal [View all]still_one
(92,115 posts)11. You signing up to fight?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Negotiations continue, as the 'Axis' refuses to lift some economic and travel sanctions effective immediately.
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#2
60 to 90 deliverable nuclear warheads of unknown megatons? Oops..forgot sbout that....
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#27
Nuclear weapons main purpose is to create terror.....Iran folks iare terrified of Israel...for better reason
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#52
I too fully support the peace talks of Obama and 5 other nations and the United Nations over
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#53
Well the sanctions will continue. If the other countries sign the deal the US will be doing the
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#5
Yes, I do think the Iranian regime is monstrous and stupid. Next question. nt
Dreamer Tatum
Mar 2015
#66
Has Russia publicly and repeatedly stated its plans to destroy another country?
Dreamer Tatum
Mar 2015
#69
You forgot the sarcasm emoticon? At the first sign of not getting what you want, walk away and let the arrows fly..got it.
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#28
Yeah, we haven't started enough illegal wars of aggression this century.
Comrade Grumpy
Mar 2015
#33
The lack of "good faith" by Israel's MANY underminings of America's President...does not bother you?
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#58
I will wait to see what happens in the next couple days before I take the" WMD NY times"
still_one
Mar 2015
#13
Even in the article they state their are other methods of deactivating the fuel without shipping
still_one
Mar 2015
#30
First of all that isn't what would happen if the talks break off, and in spite of this NY Times
still_one
Mar 2015
#19
good headline NY Times. However, since the talks are continuing, and since the same article also
still_one
Mar 2015
#17
Ha! Got it. When I was a kid, I LOVED to see an F4 hit the afterburners. God they were loud!
7962
Mar 2015
#57
The neocons, not Obama, not Iran, are making this difficult and where is it discussed
Jefferson23
Mar 2015
#56