Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
How long do you think the courts should keep this jerk off the streets? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Mar 2015 #1
I'm surprised you didn't toss off one of your own jberryhill Mar 2015 #5
That sentence was a stroke of genius. n/t RufusTFirefly Mar 2015 #17
He should be hung. snort Mar 2015 #66
Took balls to do what he did................ lastlib Mar 2015 #73
I think the guy needs some help. longship Mar 2015 #2
He has a very serious sex offender history and focuses on children Yo_Mama Mar 2015 #95
An informative post BainsBane Apr 2015 #171
thank you for this post. eom Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2015 #174
American exceptionalism - Line drawn in the sand Geronimoe Mar 2015 #3
It's insane, isn't it, peoples priorities and what they get excited above. Often I feel I RKP5637 Mar 2015 #7
Don't you think it would be smart to consider the whole story about this man? pnwmom Mar 2015 #20
Concern, yes, elleng Mar 2015 #21
But the issue is the possibility of the current offense escalating into something worse. pnwmom Mar 2015 #30
Continuing on my response #40, that was in the back RKP5637 Mar 2015 #42
I'm with you. life is excessive tho. 55 yrs no parole sounds better. elehhhhna Mar 2015 #80
Or a locked psychiatric facility. If they successfully treated him, pnwmom Mar 2015 #82
I don't know the best solution either, but life imprisonment seems a, throw hands in RKP5637 Mar 2015 #40
The solution is clearly a mental facility, not a prison. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2015 #41
He cut the GPS ankle bracelet off that they were using to monitor him, pnwmom Mar 2015 #49
I don't think you actually read what I wrote Spider Jerusalem Mar 2015 #75
Since sexual assault is a crime of power, not passion, I'm not sure castration would pnwmom Mar 2015 #77
You don't actually know what you're talking about, it's pretty clear: Spider Jerusalem Mar 2015 #78
Well, he certainly couldn't be trusted taking a pill every day, since he could decide pnwmom Mar 2015 #79
they use long-lasting injections of Depo-Provera. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2015 #83
Why would they trust him to show up for the injections? He's already proven pnwmom Mar 2015 #86
This message was self-deleted by its author BlueJazz Mar 2015 #12
Yeah, how shocking. They're trying to figure out how to keep a violent sex offender, pnwmom Mar 2015 #32
fuck him he's had many chances elehhhhna Mar 2015 #81
Are you shitting me? You're apparently unclear on what this guy was charged with. MADem Mar 2015 #115
I thought I had deleted that post Sat. BlueJazz Mar 2015 #118
No prob. It really bugs me when people mess with little kids, that's why I get so annoyed. MADem Mar 2015 #119
We're always cool MADem. :) I also was a free range kid. Summertime, I'd ride my bike.. BlueJazz Mar 2015 #131
You are apparently tolerant of considering people guilty when they treestar Mar 2015 #64
The guy is a child RAPIST. Good grief, read the whole article and click on the links within it. MADem Mar 2015 #107
Can he be treated? jberryhill Mar 2015 #4
His history is much worse. So there's a reason they're concerned. pnwmom Mar 2015 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author HomerRamone Mar 2015 #6
The mean and nasty America. He needs help but how about a psychiatric hospital? Maraya1969 Mar 2015 #8
the cost to imprison someone... Chakaconcarne Mar 2015 #61
He's a creep with a history of multiple sexual felonies and kidnapping that isn't mentioned here. pnwmom Mar 2015 #9
thanks for the info. had i taken the headline at face value alp227 Mar 2015 #15
Ditto. smirkymonkey Mar 2015 #68
Read this, and you'll be even more appalled. MADem Mar 2015 #116
I think life w/o parole is too harsh. Little Tich Mar 2015 #10
He has had much more serious sexual offenses, and one involved kidnapping. pnwmom Mar 2015 #13
The serious offences are not recent, the latest are from 1993. Little Tich Mar 2015 #16
The ones he's been caught doing. n/t pnwmom Mar 2015 #18
I think it's important to give people that clearly don't deserve Little Tich Mar 2015 #27
I'm not presuming he's guilty or even supporting a life sentence. I am saying pnwmom Mar 2015 #28
I don't know if he should be let go free or not. Little Tich Mar 2015 #36
I think he needs to be contained for life, given the fact that he's a repeat offender, has assaulted children, pnwmom Mar 2015 #37
We seem to disagree, and I think that disagreement will stand. Little Tich Mar 2015 #39
I agree with you d_r Mar 2015 #54
Would you want him living in your neighborhood? christx30 Mar 2015 #92
He is hurting no one. Just look away if you don't want to see it. We are such puritans. McCamy Taylor Mar 2015 #14
Did you notice he has a history of violent sexual offenses and kidnapping, too? pnwmom Mar 2015 #19
He's probably already done time for those things. dencol Mar 2015 #22
True. But the people you've seen probably don't have records with kidnapping and assault. n/t pnwmom Mar 2015 #23
Why didn't they give him life for kidnapping and assault? Nt dariomax Mar 2015 #33
I think it's the "three strokes and you're out" principle foo_bar Mar 2015 #34
Lol nt dariomax Mar 2015 #38
I don't know. They had him on a GPS device that he cut off pnwmom Mar 2015 #35
done his time d_r Mar 2015 #53
The thing in the parking lot was consensual. christx30 Mar 2015 #93
Life without parole is only not appopriate for any but the very worst repeat offenders alcibiades_mystery Mar 2015 #24
Kidnapping, sodomy, sexual abuse? That's what the "f" is wrong with people. MADem Mar 2015 #25
In Oregon, having consensual oral or anal sex is sodomy dariomax Mar 2015 #94
OK, now explain away "kidnapping" and "sexual abuse" why don't you? nt MADem Mar 2015 #97
First, delete "sodomy" from the post above dariomax Mar 2015 #98
No--I will not. It was in the charge sheet. And unless you were THERE, you've no idea MADem Mar 2015 #104
I don't have to explain kidnapping or sexual abuse dariomax Mar 2015 #109
You're not defending him? Oh really? MADem Mar 2015 #113
His sodomy crime was not against a child dariomax Mar 2015 #130
Again, you are wrong--see post 127. You haven't gotten one fact right, yet. MADem Mar 2015 #132
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #155
No, that is your problem. MADem posted the legal definition of Sodomy, pnwmom Apr 2015 #165
No. Rape is no longer the legal term for a penetrating sexual assault in Oregon. nt pnwmom Mar 2015 #127
Unfortunately, the same word used to apply to consensual adult relations. But that is no longer pnwmom Mar 2015 #126
No, the legal definition of Sodomy in Oregon is NOT consensual oral or anal sex. pnwmom Apr 2015 #164
"Get a hold of yourselves" lastlib Mar 2015 #74
He is a repeat violent offender Kalidurga Mar 2015 #26
You're right. A mental hospital might be the best place for him. The aim would be contain him in the most pnwmom Mar 2015 #29
He has offended with CHILDREN. And while under GPS monitoring, cut off the bracelet pnwmom Mar 2015 #31
Considering his criminal history, secondvariety Mar 2015 #43
Agreed. This guy should never be on the streets again. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #44
Unrehabilitateable sexual predator. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #45
Did he also eat little children for breakfast, lunch, and dinner? Trillo Mar 2015 #46
No, but he sexually assaulted children, whatever route he took to do that. pnwmom Mar 2015 #50
One condition of his past parole was probably a mistake. Trillo Mar 2015 #62
I agree that a locked psychiatric unit might be the best place for him pnwmom Mar 2015 #70
If you do something often enough rock Mar 2015 #47
I recommend the SOA approach. ileus Mar 2015 #48
he needs help heaven05 Mar 2015 #51
As the comments prove Americans can't handle sex Geronimoe Mar 2015 #52
He is a serial rapist. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #55
The record doesn't show this Geronimoe Mar 2015 #60
Derp. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #65
Age Geronimoe Mar 2015 #69
He lost his chance for less onerous options when he cut off his GPS bracelet pnwmom Mar 2015 #72
Are you fucking kidding me? ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #163
He was convicted of a felony sexual offense. Flashing isn't a felony. nt pnwmom Mar 2015 #71
Yes, it does. MADem Mar 2015 #117
Kidnapping, burglary, and sexual assault of children. This isn't about sex; he's a predator. pnwmom Mar 2015 #56
Althouse can't handle sex. Throd Mar 2015 #59
You need to read the whole thing ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #161
How the hell do you conflate "can't handle sex" with kidnapping, rape and JTFrog Apr 2015 #173
why was somebody guilty of kidnapping and sexual abuse walking the streets? magical thyme Mar 2015 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author CTyankee Mar 2015 #58
First time offender gets counseling treestar Mar 2015 #63
at least provide them a penthouse magazine. olddad56 Mar 2015 #67
Unbelievable Scairp Mar 2015 #76
The headline is misleading. This guy has a history of sexual assault, burglary, and kidnapping. pnwmom Mar 2015 #84
Is anyone dead? Scairp Mar 2015 #87
So child molestation is no biggie then geek tragedy Mar 2015 #89
Some little souls might have been crushed. pnwmom Mar 2015 #90
Me Scairp Mar 2015 #99
I would be fine with him being in a locked mental institution pnwmom Mar 2015 #100
You know what? Scairp Mar 2015 #103
Kidnapping, sodomy, sexual molestation. Yo_Mama Mar 2015 #96
I have to say, some of the comments in this thread are surprising for an ostensibly progressive MADem Mar 2015 #105
I would definitely like to know the details of the past offenses ... brett_jv Mar 2015 #85
He is a twice-convicted rapist. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #88
You called him convicted rapist, but dariomax Mar 2015 #111
Okay, twice-convicted sexual assault/child molestation geek tragedy Mar 2015 #112
Most states, including Oregon, no longer use the word "rape" as a legal term, pnwmom Mar 2015 #121
Thank you. This is very important information to this thread. pnwmom Mar 2015 #122
His offenses were also against at least one child he KNEW. So that child wasn't a prostitute. pnwmom Mar 2015 #91
I've posted the legal definition of "sodomy 1" elsewhere in this thread. MADem Mar 2015 #120
omg, JERKING OFF on across this world, millions daily. It should never be a crime. rladdi Mar 2015 #101
Read the posts. He's been convicted of felonious sexual assault -- in other words, rape. Of CHILDREN pnwmom Mar 2015 #125
I have to comment: The State of Idaho elected a 2 time rapist to the state senate. Yes, he is a rladdi Mar 2015 #102
He wasn't elected AS a rapist. n/t pnwmom Mar 2015 #123
I don't think he should serve a single day in jail. ZombieHorde Mar 2015 #106
He raped KIDS. MADem Mar 2015 #108
That's false dariomax Mar 2015 #110
You keep crying about sodomy but you didn't look up what "sodomy I" was in Oregon. MADem Mar 2015 #114
No one in Oregon is charged with rape anymore. Rape is no longer the legal term there or in most states. pnwmom Mar 2015 #124
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #135
First degree sexual assault in Oregon INCLUDES the crime of rape. pnwmom Mar 2015 #136
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #137
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #140
Sodomy 1, the crime he was convicted of, is oral or anal rape -- not forced kissing. n/t pnwmom Mar 2015 #143
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #154
That is a broad definition of sexual assault, not the specific Oregon definition of Sodomy in the pnwmom Apr 2015 #158
Why are you so determined to minimize the crimes of a rapist? pnwmom Mar 2015 #138
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #141
I made a small mistake -- they can be charged with vaginal rape. But his crime was oral or anal rape pnwmom Mar 2015 #142
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #144
Are you saying that males have vaginas? That's news to me. pnwmom Mar 2015 #145
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #147
No,we're witnessing deliberate obtuseness on your part. Look at the definition of Sodomy 1, pnwmom Mar 2015 #149
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #152
Where is your evidence that in Oregon the word "rape" is used in legal charges pnwmom Apr 2015 #160
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #166
Okay, fine. Men can be victims both of rape and Sodomy -- defined as forced anal or oral sex. pnwmom Apr 2015 #167
How about this? And why are you defending this guy anyway? ismnotwasm Mar 2015 #150
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #153
What are you talking about? ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #159
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #169
Cool story bro ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #170
I did NOT say there can be no rape of males. I said that the legal term used in Oregon for male pnwmom Apr 2015 #162
He was getting treatment and decided to cut off his GPS monitor and take a "vacation." pnwmom Mar 2015 #128
I believe the sentence is too long get the red out Mar 2015 #129
Well, he's a child rapist MosheFeingold Mar 2015 #133
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #148
Sodomy 1 in Oregon is a sexual assault equivalent in evil to rape even if another term is used.n/t pnwmom Apr 2015 #168
I don't like "three strikes laws". This is a tough one, but he shouldn't get life. Xithras Mar 2015 #134
He served time for the crimes and was released. And then, while out on parole, pnwmom Mar 2015 #139
So revoke his parole. Xithras Mar 2015 #146
I'm not a shrink, but ... Recursion Apr 2015 #156
If he insists on exposing himelf for sexual gratification to peple who do not ask. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #151
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #157
for all those feeling sad at the words, life, for all the fuckin shit he did in a lifetime to other seabeyond Apr 2015 #172
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Oregon Supreme Court to c...»Reply #127