Latest Breaking News

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)

13. Apparently it was already classified when it hit her server.

Thu Aug 20, 2015, 02:20 PM

Aug 2015

When you produce a very sensitive document, it is classified immediately. If someone took excerpts or summaries and put them in the email, makes the email classified as well.

Get it? Got it? Good!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

84 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. Said to Probe How Classified Data Got on Hillary Clinton�s Server [View all] candelista Aug 2015 OP

Classified data that wasn't classified before it was classified liberal N proud Aug 2015 #1

Apparently it was already classified when it hit her server. Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #13

What does retroactively mean? liberal N proud Aug 2015 #25

Scenario... AnPak Aug 2015 #53

Darn, I wish I was as smart and articulate as you are. Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #58

From the dictionary Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #56

says the Clinton team, versus the Inspector General magical thyme Aug 2015 #16

That only works when you deal with information originated exclusively from with your own 24601 Aug 2015 #23

What was the word that the justice depth used? Oh yeah RETROACTIVELY liberal N proud Aug 2015 #24

because the State Dept retroactively stamped them 'classified' does not mean they didn't magical thyme Aug 2015 #79

How do you know they will be rectroactively classified at the time they were not classified? liberal N proud Aug 2015 #80

Huh? that makes no sense and is not what I (or the linked article) said magical thyme Aug 2015 #82

One of the emails was forwarded to her private server containing info on current troop movements TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #17

Of course they're going to take the rap. I said a while back that it appears her aides TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #2

Now you're starting to talk nonsense... Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #14

I often wonder how much of this has gone on with other individuals, not to HRC, but RKP5637 Aug 2015 #51

I'll bet many top officials are loose with classified info, but they're generally TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #60

It was certainly pretty brazen IMO. In my corporate life I would have been fired if I had put RKP5637 Aug 2015 #63

This is not really breaking news. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #3

What's new is the material suggesting her aides were responsible. candelista Aug 2015 #5

Fair enough but to me it is all a big nothing. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #12

Why would the person sending the email be ... JoePhilly Aug 2015 #28

It's always an aide awoke_in_2003 Aug 2015 #81

This is only the second LBN on this subject I have seen today. Of course I saw a few earlier this still_one Aug 2015 #26

Her having her own fucking mail server shows what a control freak she is snooper2 Aug 2015 #4

Would she use a private server as President? candelista Aug 2015 #6

Precisely. "I've gotta do a better job covering my shit next time"! nt 7962 Aug 2015 #7

That reminds me: When they asked Nixon what he learned from Watergate... candelista Aug 2015 #10

Thats right! Forgot about that. 7962 Aug 2015 #15

setting up the sacrificial staff members restorefreedom Aug 2015 #8

Don't count on it... AnPak Aug 2015 #57

what do you think will become of this? nt restorefreedom Aug 2015 #59

I think they will hold fast and wait for it to pass... AnPak Aug 2015 #67

i agree with you on the first part restorefreedom Aug 2015 #69

Here's the biggest problem I have with her nonsense: 7962 Aug 2015 #9

" " " MBS Aug 2015 #19

+10000 karynnj Aug 2015 #55

yes, really good point. MBS Aug 2015 #70

Yep. I could understand screwing up with SECRET jeff47 Aug 2015 #21

Yep we know daybranch Aug 2015 #33

That's right folks! Hillary is innocent! It's all (fill in the blank) fault! Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #11

It's outrageous to blame employees for following the boss's instructions in something like this. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #18

Well, legally it is their fault. jeff47 Aug 2015 #22

But in such a case the boss would be in trouble as well and might face the harshest penalty. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2015 #30

As someone that's dealt with classified data tammywammy Aug 2015 #32

What if the receiver was your boss and you were following their instructions in the sending? PoliticAverse Aug 2015 #34

It's a hypothetical that'll never happen. tammywammy Aug 2015 #35

What if your boss explicitly told you to forward classified info to him? candelista Aug 2015 #36

Then actually doing it is still your fault. jeff47 Aug 2015 #37

Still your fault, but not only yours. candelista Aug 2015 #39

No, two separate crimes. jeff47 Aug 2015 #40

That's called "straining at a gnat." candelista Aug 2015 #42

No, I just don't think "I was just following orders" is an excuse for anything. jeff47 Aug 2015 #43

Dave, I read with patience your many repetitive posts about TS/SCI. candelista Aug 2015 #44

Who's Dave? jeff47 Aug 2015 #45

Jeff, Dave, Cliff...What's the difference? candelista Aug 2015 #61

At some point it is a conspiracy and all are equally responsible. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #49

Possible Felony Eugene Stoner Aug 2015 #20

Really, so in your infinite wisdom, your sage legal mind has come to that conclusion. Pray tell still_one Aug 2015 #27

The person who sends an email is not ... JoePhilly Aug 2015 #29

"receiving child pornography" is a crime. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2015 #31

What part of Possible do you not understand? Eugene Stoner Aug 2015 #38

I only said POSSIBLE Eugene Stoner Aug 2015 #77

Jury Results: Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #78

Here are some relevant sections of 18 U.S. Code � 793 candelista Aug 2015 #41

"any person not entitled to receive it" JDPriestly Aug 2015 #50

She sent material that was "born classified" to Sid Blumenthal, among others candelista Aug 2015 #74

What were HRC's violations of these sections? n/t GitRDun Aug 2015 #64

:) candelista Aug 2015 #73

Watching to see if the administration official's supposed comment to Bremmer gets walked back Babel_17 Aug 2015 #46

Huma and Cheryl taking the rap for what? Kingofalldems Aug 2015 #47

Fuck the republiCONs and their witch hunt madokie Aug 2015 #48

best response yet riversedge Aug 2015 #71

Oops. Who will take the rap for this? Kingofalldems Aug 2015 #52

This is the key part of this article: underthematrix Aug 2015 #54

You understand that you cannot deliberately glean classified info from the proper channels TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #62

Exactly,,,, Possibly a Felony level Federal crime Eugene Stoner Aug 2015 #65

Welcome to DU. 840high Aug 2015 #66

Welcome to you Eugene Stoner Aug 2015 #76

I think you missed my point and focus - content of article underthematrix Aug 2015 #68

A summary of classified info would ipfilter Aug 2015 #75

I agree with you. If the summary underthematrix Aug 2015 #83

I read medical records every day for my job forthemiddle Aug 2015 #84

She was duped again? Deadbeat Republicans Aug 2015 #72