Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(1,701 posts)

2. I don't think that is it.

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 03:22 PM

Mar 2016

If I have this right, he has to pay current pensions, but does not have to fully fund future ones. Perhaps someone from New Jersey can clarify this.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court rejects NJ employees’ appeal over pension fund [View all] Calista241 Mar 2016 OP

I don't think that is it. potone Mar 2016 #2

correct psychmommy Mar 2016 #4

sucks to be me lol psychmommy Mar 2016 #6

Oh, no! I hate to hear that! Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2016 #7

Whatever it means, it means the pensioners get screwed. nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #3

Locking... BooScout Mar 2016 #8