Latest Breaking News

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)

9. let me guess....

Reply to leftofcool (Reply #2)

Wed May 4, 2016, 08:21 PM

May 2016

....she had a child?

These Republicans sure don't know much about women, pregnancies, or families!

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Deadlines loom for answers in Clinton email probe as U.S. judge sets discovery [View all] Land of Enchantment May 2016 OP

Here's her answer: no. She didn't. She knew that all her emails to and from .gov pnwmom May 2016 #1

Explains why the government had to ask her Press Virginia May 2016 #6

The state department had to repeatedly ask for Clinton's emails NWCorona May 2016 #14

No, they asked her once. She didn't resist. But it took a month to go through 55,000 emails. pnwmom May 2016 #15

Not true. They asked for them multiple times going back to June 2014 NWCorona May 2016 #16

Link, please. Here's mine. pnwmom May 2016 #21

And here's mine. NWCorona May 2016 #23

Yes she did. She had her lawyers stiff arm the State Department Ash_F May 2016 #18

Link, please. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #20

Here Ash_F May 2016 #24

. . . pnwmom May 2016 #25

Negotiations began in August Ash_F May 2016 #27

Whatever the heck that means. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #28

It means it did not take them "1 month" Ash_F May 2016 #29

It took them five weeks from the time the letter was sent. And there was no official pnwmom May 2016 #30

Right just State Department officials making a request Ash_F May 2016 #31

The only thing we know for sure is that an official written request was sent on October 28. pnwmom May 2016 #32

I don't think the Times was the only news source that reported on the Summer negotiations. Ash_F May 2016 #33

Nothing matters till the written letter was sent. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #36

To you maybe Ash_F May 2016 #38

How many do you send involving 55,000 pages of emails? pnwmom May 2016 #39

None, but those belonged to the government in the first place Ash_F May 2016 #43

Meh. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #44

After all, your source is Clinton's own website, and therefore completely trustworthy Android3.14 May 2016 #35

Please prove that it isn't accurate that the first written request was sent on October 28. pnwmom May 2016 #37

The same information is available from the National Archives. pnwmom May 2016 #40

judicial watch BHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! leftofcool May 2016 #2

let me guess.... JonLeibowitz May 2016 #9

And some Sanders supporters are lapping it up like water out of a dog bowl. Chicago1980 May 2016 #19

More like dogs lapping up water out of a toilet bowl. nt COLGATE4 May 2016 #42

where are supporters of Senator Sanders commenting at all? OwlinAZ May 2016 #45

No Hillary troll, truth teller. Chicago1980 May 2016 #46

Only a fool treats these guys like fools. Android3.14 May 2016 #47

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Skittles May 2016 #3

seems like the Clinton folks are good at closing their ears, with lots of zzzzzzzzzzz's tomm2thumbs May 2016 #4

i believe it's been demonstrated to the satisfaction of many mooseprime May 2016 #8

Indeed! Who needs any legally acceptable proof of guit when certain people are perfectly happy with beastie boy May 2016 #12

I am so sorry you agree with judicial watch over Huma's maternity leave. leftofcool May 2016 #34

first sentence tomm2thumbs May 2016 #41

Some here laugh at FOIA and I find that curious for liberals, very curious. haikugal May 2016 #5

Come on - you and I both know that those people aren't liberals. Maedhros May 2016 #17

Yeah, but I was being kind by calling them liberals, not correct. haikugal May 2016 #22

I thought the date was interesting. This part of the story Land of Enchantment May 2016 #7

Hell I probably would take the 5th as well especially considering what they went on to nail cstanleytech May 2016 #10

Yeah, I think he can plead the 5th in Land of Enchantment May 2016 #11

Unless its a blanket immunity for both state and federal crimes cstanleytech May 2016 #13

remember - this is not the FBI investigation grasswire May 2016 #26

Locking Duplicate Thread. Continue this discussion here: In_The_Wind May 2016 #48