Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
21. How Republicans can steal a contested election:
Sat May 7, 2016, 09:51 PM
May 2016
and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelfth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

If no candidate wins a majority of electoral votes, it is this very Republican Congress which would first have the option to decide, shortly after electors cast their votes, which is shortly after the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December, or Monday the 19th of 2016.

At that point Congress is supposed to pick among the top three candidates--which is where the ultraconservative spoiler has a chance to steal it. The way the vote goes is strange: each state has only one vote, and a candidate must win 26 states. That works heavily in favor of the flyover states, which suddenly have a dramatically out-of-proportion influence relative to their populations. Mitt Romney got whooped by over 120 EVs and still won 24 states in 2012; I don't know how many states have a majority of Republican Members in the House, but thanks to their gerrymandering, I'll bet it's more than that. (Democrats might try to assert that it's the senior Member of the delegation who decides, but it won't work.)

They would of course pick among the two running Republicans if Trump does us the favor of flipping the House for the next Congress. But if he doesn't, there's another option....

Members of the House are up for election in only two years, and they'll pay dearly for stealing an election. What if they do what they do best, and do nothing?

Sure, they're supposed to immediately choose, just like the Senate is supposed to hold hearings on a Supreme Court nominee. But nothing happens if they don't, and they only have to delay for two weeks before the 115th Congress ends.

One could and surely would argue that when the next, 116th, Congress takes over in early January, 2017, the window of opportunity to choose a President is clearly lost and now the line of succession as dictated by the 25th Amendment and continuity of government laws prevails.

And the evenly-divided Supreme Court would deadlock 4-4 and be of no help. It would be easy to run out the clock and simply move the problem beyond the 12th Amendment decision.

So if they don't choose in December, everything turns on the elections within Congress in the first week of January, 2017. It's a new Congress and therefore they have to elect a new Speaker of the House and President Pro Tempore, who are third and fourth in line of succession to the Presidency, according to continuity of government laws, and first and second when the terms of President Obama and Vice President Biden expire on January 20.

Whomever wins as Speaker--and Paul Ryan is the runaway favorite--would become acting President at noon on January 20, and in completely uncharted territory.

Is he supposed to hold an emergency election? Probably, but he won't. If you toss it into court, he'll nominate Dick Cheney as the ninth Supreme Court Justice and win 5-4, whatever he decides. Does the Acting President's term ever end? What if he declares a state of emergency and suspends elections forever? Republican criminals are in a position to decide all those things, and they're on the verge of a permanent demographic collapse, where stealing the United States forever might be their last and only chance to retain power....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_line_of_succession

Anyway, that's all I've found so far. Sleep well, Democrats. Check your voter registration first thing on Monday, and don't piss away your vote forever on a protest candidate, eh?
Well, the RNC just backed Trump, so if Romney or someone else thinks they can run, they better have still_one May 2016 #1
Mitt knows how to raise cash in a hurry Jack Rabbit May 2016 #3
lol, maybe still_one May 2016 #4
Could you imagine Kristol as president? Jack Rabbit May 2016 #2
Kristol, who is consistently wrong about everything, The Velveteen Ocelot May 2016 #5
Hate is a strong word: so I dislike, detest, and despise R$. C Moon May 2016 #6
If the goal is to run a "real conservative", why would you pick Romney? brooklynite May 2016 #7
Please run Mitt. Or any other GOP leader as 3rd party. Please. nt TeamPooka May 2016 #8
Kristol and BlueMTexpat May 2016 #9
12th amendment scheme in effect? Vanilla Warcraft May 2016 #10
Wecome to DU gopiscrap May 2016 #18
The plan is to split up the electoral votes... Human101948 May 2016 #11
You are likely right, but it will depend on the new Congress. bemildred May 2016 #14
I think it would be decided by the lame duck Congress... Human101948 May 2016 #16
I don't know. I sort of thought the new Congress would get to decide. bemildred May 2016 #17
Nah they will split the repub vote and give Clinton a sweep. Warren Stupidity May 2016 #19
You Mean Give Sanders a Sweep McKim May 2016 #20
You tell em ' McKim' laserhaas May 2016 #27
How Republicans can steal a contested election: sofa king May 2016 #21
Or, here is a way that the moneychangers can steal the election... olddad56 May 2016 #25
The Election of 1824 shows the utter dysfunction to the process. roamer65 May 2016 #22
Keep after it guys, it's bound to work one of these days. nt bemildred May 2016 #12
lulz jpak May 2016 #13
Why don't they bring in Newt Gingrich.. sendero May 2016 #15
I wish I could get Bill Kristol to give me advice ThoughtCriminal May 2016 #23
Do it. Bernie would then have a shot and probably win LiberalLovinLug May 2016 #24
Yeah Baby! laserhaas May 2016 #28
I'VE been warning this was coming since Jan. 2015 laserhaas May 2016 #26
"“He came pretty close to being elected president" awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mitt Romney met privately...»Reply #21