Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(35,300 posts)
5. It seems to have a gap between claims and research.
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:28 PM
May 2016

Silica dust is bad. So is benzene.

Fracking uses and emits (some) silica dust.

Therefore, exposure of humans, esp. young children, to fracking must be bad.

1. What's the actual exposure for those exposed to fracking?

2. What number of children are affected?

3. Can steps be taken to mitigate that exposure?

Esp. since most fracking is not in populated areas, and those in those areas tend to be adults.

It always creates a bit of angst for me when a politician, even one like Sanders who, I have to assume, has multiple PhDs in engineering, chemistry, and public health, is cited as an authority, simply because I have to assume he's been too busy recently to have contributed to the literature specific to this problem.

Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "terra forming."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fracking's Air Pollution ...»Reply #5