Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
78. Thread winner with header & giphy
Wed May 25, 2016, 06:26 PM
May 2016
Already posted cstanleytech May 2016 #1
3rd time today riversedge May 2016 #5
Never stopped you from reposting Perogie May 2016 #21
POPEGHAZI!!! frylock May 2016 #37
Thread winner with header & giphy Kittycat May 2016 #78
Oh we're sorry. Did this news interrupt your scheduled 104th time rehashing of some Betty Karlson May 2016 #59
Anything goes in 'Latest Bernie News.' nt onehandle May 2016 #30
Some of us are not online here all day. libdem4life May 2016 #40
You're missing the point ejbr May 2016 #46
I have only heard "jeopardize national security" in relation to this story from right wingers. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #52
Well there is a first time for everything; ejbr May 2016 #55
OMG ... Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #57
You should share that with the FBI ejbr May 2016 #61
One of us has a serious misinterpretation of the meaning of the word "progressive" Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #62
Oh ejbr May 2016 #63
A progressive, and certainly a liberal, is supposed to be able to see big pictures. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #64
Yeah ejbr May 2016 #72
Some folks think that progressive means the rules down apply to... TipTok May 2016 #77
All you had to do was check the LBN forum its right there plain as day and I cstanleytech May 2016 #65
I don't tend to go there first. libdem4life May 2016 #68
" there were a variety of positions and interpretations." Welcome to the DU :P lol cstanleytech May 2016 #70
Indeed. libdem4life May 2016 #73
Federal Regulations and laws not simple rules SusanLarson May 2016 #2
Bull. James48 May 2016 #7
is that the marvel comics creator. lol. n/t. okieinpain May 2016 #8
So if there was any law "violation", it was the agency that allowed it, not the individual. George II May 2016 #15
That didn't make sense Perogie May 2016 #23
Read the law that was posted. George II May 2016 #28
The FBI doesn't launch investigations of rule violations. SusanLarson May 2016 #35
K & R nt findrskeep May 2016 #3
She did herself no favors of sorting them first and destoying the e-mails from Bill asking her .... marble falls May 2016 #4
So wait, are you suggesting because Cheney got away with it dorkzilla May 2016 #17
Yes. Big batch of nothing. State Department is trying to cover its ass. Now. Not then. Laser102 May 2016 #31
LOL, sure, that's plausible dorkzilla May 2016 #38
So under the bus with John Kerry and the State Department! frylock May 2016 #39
No, I think you should run Hillary out of town on a rail for using the wrong hardware Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #54
See, the thing is... dorkzilla May 2016 #67
Sorry, no indictment fairy! leftofcool May 2016 #6
Nope. Just the Shit Hit the Fan Fairy. frylock May 2016 #41
DoJ hasn't weighed in yet. Ikonoklast May 2016 #48
Right. Hillary did wrong. So what? WhiteHat May 2016 #9
Clinton can beat Trump? MisterP May 2016 #19
so is there or is there not any legal liability? RussBLib May 2016 #10
I'm sure we will find out shortly dorkzilla May 2016 #11
I agree with you, dorkz ReRe May 2016 #66
The FBI did ask for State to hold off on their investigation until they were finished dorkzilla May 2016 #74
So I had it backwards? ReRe May 2016 #76
this one of the legal statutes that could come into play AntiBank May 2016 #13
You answered the question in the negative. No prosecution, and sorry to tell you this, no indictment George II May 2016 #16
Much to the chagrin of Sanders fans, she did nothing illegal. George II May 2016 #14
that still truly remains to be seen, you are not on the FBI criminal investigation team AntiBank May 2016 #27
Having the server "attacked" and it being "hacked" are two completely different things..... George II May 2016 #29
here is a real hack, released in 2013, it could only have come from one of 2 places AntiBank May 2016 #49
I'm with you George II. No indictment no criminal charges, nothing. Laser102 May 2016 #33
"Clinton declined to be interviewed" Babel_17 May 2016 #12
Gee, maybe because they were being investigated by the GOP and running for office. Justice May 2016 #32
You spelled FBI incorrectly. frylock May 2016 #43
"The inspector general has rejected allegations of bias" Babel_17 May 2016 #75
Well, gosh. If you have nothing to hide... frylock May 2016 #42
Unless One Does.... LovingA2andMI May 2016 #51
Dunh-dunh-DUNNNNNHHHHHH frylock May 2016 #53
Clinton’s actions were not unlawful under either federal records preservation laws or criminal laws Justice May 2016 #18
Here is an interesting breakdown dorkzilla May 2016 #20
Did Ken Starr get a new job... Tribalceltic May 2016 #22
K & R N/T w0nderer May 2016 #24
No big deal: "Everyone does it" <-- what I'm being told by Hillarians. 99th_Monkey May 2016 #25
Cleared? LOL SusanLarson May 2016 #36
I apologize if I was no clear. 99th_Monkey May 2016 #60
Can you clarify if this was the law that was changed 5 minutes after the Email server was discovered MidwestTech May 2016 #47
Are any other former SOStates officially under an FBI Investigation? 99th_Monkey May 2016 #58
the sky is not falling -- Relax everybody and read this dcbuckeye May 2016 #26
"at this point" dorkzilla May 2016 #44
Or not. (The shoe) emulatorloo May 2016 #56
I respectfully disagree dorkzilla May 2016 #71
The aide who said everything was cool, we've got legal clearance to do this (paraphrasing) Babel_17 May 2016 #79
Dupe. L. Coyote May 2016 #34
Gotta wonder why it hasnt been locked by the hosts as usually dupes arent allowed. nt cstanleytech May 2016 #69
bookmarking for later. nt silvershadow May 2016 #45
The Interview To See Is Wolf Blitzer LovingA2andMI May 2016 #50
Thank you, and I hope you can find a link (nt) Babel_17 May 2016 #80
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton Violated ...»Reply #78